McKinsey Interview Anyone?

I have one coming up after the new year (scheduling problems) and I was wondering if anyone else has had one yet and if they could share experiences, tips ... etc.

Consulting Case Interview Course

  • 2,037 questions across 209 consulting firms. Crowdsourced from over 600,000 members.
  • 11 Detailed Exclusive Cases developed by a McKinsey Associate and 10+ hours of video.
  • Trusted by over 1,000 aspiring consultants just like you.

Comments (20)

Best Response
Dec 8, 2006 - 10:49pm

with MBB. Best tip is always have structure, but that's a given.

McKinsey - limited fit, primarily case work and shear intellect. Had a complicated numbers case. Final round is with partners and complicated math, if you don't nail it, I got the sense you were cooked.

Bain - connect everything with real world strategy and tips to grow the company. Diagnosing the problem is not enough, connect it with a solution that can drive real returns. Fit is also very important, work hard, play hard.

BCG - More fit, academic in nature. Serious work with charts and graphs. Easier then the other two.

Dec 11, 2006 - 8:30pm
2007Analyst:
with MBB. Best tip is always have structure, but that's a given.

McKinsey - limited fit, primarily case work and shear intellect. Had a complicated numbers case. Final round is with partners and complicated math, if you don't nail it, I got the sense you were cooked.

Bain - connect everything with real world strategy and tips to grow the company. Diagnosing the problem is not enough, connect it with a solution that can drive real returns. Fit is also very important, work hard, play hard.

BCG - More fit, academic in nature. Serious work with charts and graphs. Easier then the other two.

Agree: McKinsey cases are math intensive, especially in the early rounds. In my experience, the Bain cases were much more logical..much easier to get through.

The BCG cases were more difficult in terms of putting a structure around a problem and then drilling down into the issues.

There is a book called "Case in Point" which is great case prep

Mar 1, 2007 - 4:07pm

Although my partner interview wasn't that math intensive...everything depends on how you structure.
I found that they work with you and give feed back. They aren't trying to screw you, they just don't make it easy.

For example:

EM walks in, shakes my hand, we start talking... before I knew it I was deeply entrenched in the organic foods industry discussing how I would increase sales of ketchup from $25 mm to $400 mm in 5 years. They don't expect you to re-invent the wheel, but you need to know the right steps to at least build a wheel. Poor analogy, I know, but everything is structure, structure, structure, step by step. A= .... B= .... C=....

In following up, the guy told me flat out that I need to improve my structure and that I need to force myself to think within a framework. He said if I get a partner interview, that I should take more time and pause before thinking, brutally honest but helpful.

I got the offer...so hopefully I'll figure it out. Also, remember that they train the crap out of you, so don't try and be perfect. Be enthusiastic, genuine, communicate well, show intelligence, and ace the 70 minute test. I had no contacts and not the world's greatest resume either...

I think showing true desire to be there and not just get a couple years on the resume and a sincere interest in who they are and what they do is key. Just from my experience so take it with a grain of salt...

Learn More

300+ video lessons across 6 modeling courses taught by elite practitioners at the top investment banks and private equity funds -- Excel Modeling -- Financial Statement Modeling -- M&A Modeling -- LBO Modeling -- DCF and Valuation Modeling -- ALL INCLUDED + 2 Huge Bonuses.

Learn more
Feb 26, 2007 - 3:25pm

I was asked a question by a EM at McKinsey during my interview...

crapload of information about starting up an airline company and I was required to extract all the formulas and solve a series of 5 equations under a time limit. Luckily, I answered the problem correctly. Unfortunately, I didn't get the offer (other interview didnt go to well in the same round)

GOOD LUCK

Mar 2, 2007 - 1:35pm

I more or less did it wrong, whereas I just started going and picked up steam as I went along...but the EM told me afterward that it would be better to ask for a moment to think about it before just diving right in.

Take a moment (i dunno 15-30 seconds) and work within a framework in your mind. Come up with 3 points and then proceed:'

"There are three things to consider:

1)
2)
3)...."

He also mentioned, which I thought was somewhat funny, that after saying "Here are 3 things" that thinking in a framework may help you think of other things...so there could be a 4)... and 5)...

During your time of personal thought, be sure to quickly consider alternatives or rejections, because once you take your course of action, right or wrong they will push you and challenge your assumptions so that they stand firm.

Good luck!

Mar 2, 2007 - 3:31pm
raider4ever:
I more or less did it wrong, whereas I just started going and picked up steam as I went along...but the EM told me afterward that it would be better to ask for a moment to think about it before just diving right in.

Take a moment (i dunno 15-30 seconds) and work within a framework in your mind. Come up with 3 points and then proceed:'

"There are three things to consider:

1)
2)
3)...."

He also mentioned, which I thought was somewhat funny, that after saying "Here are 3 things" that thinking in a framework may help you think of other things...so there could be a 4)... and 5)...

During your time of personal thought, be sure to quickly consider alternatives or rejections, because once you take your course of action, right or wrong they will push you and challenge your assumptions so that they stand firm.

Good luck!

So you received an offer to be a partner at McK?

Jul 12, 2007 - 5:46pm

Natus ex ut voluptatibus laborum consequuntur quam ut. Aliquid nam ducimus nesciunt eius dignissimos aspernatur dolorem. Ad et est incidunt ut sed delectus. Odit eum non nobis. Sit sed culpa aut.

Deleniti qui quam voluptas vel ipsum labore assumenda. Sit aut rem veniam. Incidunt doloremque officia rerum voluptatem. Eaque exercitationem aut deserunt voluptas reiciendis quisquam pariatur.

Consectetur qui accusamus quis quas recusandae. Omnis perspiciatis consequuntur laudantium explicabo reiciendis quia. Ipsum iure alias enim qui at molestias distinctio temporibus. Distinctio repudiandae autem est facere voluptas aut officia blanditiis. Et sed veritatis ut tenetur optio. Rerum aspernatur temporibus quam aut fugit quae.

Start Discussion

Total Avg Compensation

November 2021 Consulting

  • Principal (22) $269
  • Director/MD (43) $260
  • Vice President (36) $244
  • Engagement Manager (79) $217
  • Manager (133) $165
  • 2nd Year Associate (128) $137
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (96) $129
  • Senior Consultant (284) $128
  • Consultant (509) $115
  • 1st Year Associate (455) $113
  • NA (11) $111
  • Engineer (4) $110
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (117) $107
  • 2nd Year Analyst (262) $97
  • Associate Consultant (143) $95
  • 1st Year Analyst (887) $85
  • Intern/Summer Associate (146) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (404) $67