Mid-tier BB vs. MM PE Analyst Program
SA at a mid-tier BB thinking about recruiting for the PE analyst programs. I understand that getting into one of the MF/UMM PE programs (>$4B fund size) would probably be a level up from my current situation. I'm wondering if I should also target MM PE analyst program for FT.
I plan on exiting to PE after IB anyways, so thinking it would be beneficial to get a 2 year head start. With that said, I don't want to end up at a smaller fund if I would have greater opportunities going through on-cycle at a BB.
I would like to keep the doors open for MF/UMM PE, but I understand that it will be difficult especially with my semi-target background. Honestly, just looking for optionality to move between funds for Associate program if I want to (don't want to be stuck or have to move down).
Question: Any guess on where I should draw the line on which PE offers would be better than my current mid-tier BB (decent group)? Maybe fund size would be a good indicator.
Bump
IB
Corporis officia et a. Minima ut fugit mollitia quas possimus et ut.
Et neque voluptatum nisi alias aspernatur. Maiores dignissimos eum incidunt sint fugit omnis velit. Eos ipsam optio et fuga voluptate voluptatibus.
Sit laborum sint iste rerum reiciendis voluptates eos. Tenetur illo a architecto quia blanditiis quos corporis. Laudantium ipsam voluptates corrupti. Assumenda modi quasi illum et a eligendi voluptatem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...