Mid-year DCF - Terminal Value Technical Question

I'm looking over DCF mid-year conventions and came across this formula:

=IF(midyear, MAX(YEARFRAC(start date, period date,1)-0.5, YEARFRAC(start date, period date,1)/2), YEARFRAC(start date, period date,1)

If anyone could explain the reasoning to me behind it, it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

 
Most Helpful

That's not a complete formula and it's a little out of context, but the idea is that if the "categorization" cell (my own words) is set to "midyear" then it'll return one value. If it's not, it'll return the other. One problem here is that your "midyear" argument doesn't have a cell designated that it's checking to see if it's set to "midyear". You also didn't include the final closing bracket.

For the logic, the argument is supposed to check if your designated cell says "midyear". If it does, it will return the largest of the 2 values calculated with the following two arguments (the fraction of the year - 0.5, or the fraction of the year divided by 2). If it's not set to "midyear", it will give you the full fraction of the year.

You're determining how to run the DCF, deciding how much to discount the cash flows. If you're treating it as a midyear calculation (common with companies that gain money steadily through the year vs. companies that are seasonal and gain most of their money near the end of the year) then it will lead to a higher valuation returned because it's discounted less due to the time value of money. If you're not treating it as a midyear valuation, it will give you a slightly lower valuation because the cash flows are discounted entirely at the end of the year.

 

^What the poster above said. It's typically used to represent even cash flows throughout the year, opposed to all at the end of the year if you don't use mid-year convention. So using mid-year convention, it would be ^n-0.5, instead of ^n. This will lead to a higher valuation as cash flows are get discounted in the middle of the year rather than at the end.

 

Voluptas consequatur iste minus provident ex omnis. Voluptatem et vero fuga provident qui voluptatem. Nam harum dignissimos sunt quis reiciendis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”