Mini/Small caps SPA execution: Purchase Price Mechanism (Working Capital)

Hi,

with regard to really small companies (3 - 10m sales): How do you set the purchase price mechanism especially the working capital mechanism in the SPA?

In large deals, besides a debt/cash clause, I try to include a working capital mechanism (Target WC - Actual/Closing WC) as a correction mechanism at closing of the deal. Even there its hard to determine Target WC but at least you have an intra-year reporting to base on. With small companies though, which only have a rudimentary internal reporting (i.e. without reporting any work in progress or other inventory reporting during the year), it is hard to determine a Target value.

What do you do or what would you recommend? Do you even implement a WC mechanism or do you skip it? It is really a pain in the ass for me as 1. Sellers do not understand the mechanism and 2. due to the lack of information it is hard to negotiate on the Target value.

P.S.: I work outside the US in the engineering services sector.

Mick

 

Not sure what is considered standard outside of US. But it's common to hire accountants to do a quality of earnings even on small deals that would include a NWC PEG, and some kind of true up adjustment in the SPA at deal closing (and even a separate final NWC true up after closing). The QoE would try to "normalize" the NWC PEG. And assuming you're using average of LTM (or similar time frame), most of the months you'd capture in your average would include months that don't have typical year end gross ups (like WIP) that would otherwise accurately reflect NWC. As long as you're being consistent in how you're calculating the Target vs. Final, you should be directionally there. In any case, I tend to view NWC PEGs as a way of keeping the sellers honest moreso than trying to extract any economic value.

As far as explaining it to unsophisticated sellers, well...welcome to doing tiny deals. I have found that if you explain a NWC PEG in the context of how it could benefit them (i.e., the Final is greater than Target and so it's an increase to how much cash they'll receive), they suddenly understand it better...

 
jobless123:
And assuming you're using average of LTM (or similar time frame), most of the months you'd capture in your average would include months that don't have typical year end gross ups (like WIP) that would otherwise accurately reflect NWC. As long as you're being consistent in how you're calculating the Target vs. Final, you should be directionally there.
So you exclude WIP from the WC definition in case closing accounts are based on an intra-year month w/o WIP? Hard to explain that to the seller as he might get afraid that e.g. TAR are too low as most of the work is included in ongoing project work.
jobless123:
In any case, I tend to view NWC PEGs as a way of keeping the sellers honest moreso than trying to extract any economic value.

As far as explaining it to unsophisticated sellers, well...welcome to doing tiny deals. I have found that if you explain a NWC PEG in the context of how it could benefit them (i.e., the Final is greater than Target and so it's an increase to how much cash they'll receive), they suddenly understand it better...

Yes, I also start with your first argument and only after the positive cash referral they suddenly get it.
 
Best Response

Et dolor exercitationem voluptatibus deleniti dolorem quas necessitatibus. Eos facere iure et.

Odio illum vero quod molestiae sequi ipsum. Voluptates est consequatur ut id iusto et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”