Model from scratch?

What does building a model from scratch mean? does it mean opening up a blank piece of excel sheet and inputting everything, including account titles and formatting? I'm taking a course on financial modleling, and feel like the latter is extremely hard without any preexisting templates.

 

Yes, I agree that building a model from scratch is a much better way to really understand what is going on. It really doesn't take all that long unless you are building in LBO, DCF, depreciation schedules, automatic revolver draw, complicated debt instruments, etc. If you are just looking to put together a simple CF, IS, BS model with some revenue assumptions its not too bad.

 

You can take short cuts if you know your model is just a high level forecast. For example: You don't need to set up an "automatic revolver" draw if you know that your forecast will never cause your cash position to go negative. Or -- if you know that your cash position will go negative for just 1 year in a 5-year forecast, you can do a quick and dirty model that permits a negative cash position and just treats that as net debt.

CompBanker’s Career Guidance Services: https://www.rossettiadvisors.com/
 
CompBanker:
You can take short cuts if you know your model is just a high level forecast. For example: You don't need to set up an "automatic revolver" draw if you know that your forecast will never cause your cash position to go negative. Or -- if you know that your cash position will go negative for just 1 year in a 5-year forecast, you can do a quick and dirty model that permits a negative cash position and just treats that as net debt.

Ahh, the old do as I say and not as I do approach.

 
Best Response

It depends on the firm, but in general you should (almost) always start from scratch. Here's why:

  1. You will know the model inside out if you build it from a clean sheet. If you use a template, the only way that you will understand and "know" the template 100% is if you go through and audit each cell, but if you're going to do that, why not just start from scratch? When your associate asks you how cell A is calculated, you want to be able to explain that to him as opposed to saying you don't know.

  2. As an analyst, one of the most important themes of the job is that it's about learning. Obviously, the work product comes first and it's not like school in the sense that education is the top priority, but you should view it as a path to develop marketable skills. Modeling is one of those skills that's especially applicable at the junior level, and you're missing out on this if you don't start from scratch. Most PE firms will have you build some sort of model, and often from scratch, so keep that in mind if you're thinking about the buyside.

Obviously, there are always exceptions. If you're brought onto a deal/pitch midway and there's already a model, there's no need to rebuild the whole thing unless the model is just a mess. If your associate is super insistent that you use a template (most good associates won't be), then I wouldn't butt heads too hard.

 

I think knowing how to build a model right off the bat is good to know and may help you get the job but it isn't necessary. Most associate level positions within ER are associate level which means you will be taught a lot from the analyst that you work under.

In terms of writing style, it depends on the analyst. Some like to only get straight to the point and put just facts with very little style. Yet there are others that take their time getting to the point and try to use their riting to their advantage.

Multiple masters degrees don't matter. Only the MSF or MBA. Unless of course you are applying to an asosciate role in a sector that you have a masters in. For instance, if you have a masters in electrical engineering and are trying to get a job in the Tech- Hardware sector, it would probably make you stand out.

Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules.
 

You’re already expected to learn how to model right off the bat so it’s not a differentiator but rather a check mark. Another master's degree isn't as useful as you might think. If the company was looking to higher people with industry knowledge then they would look for people who actually worked in that industry. For writing style, try to be as concise as possible since most people only read the front page anyways.

 
Monopolisf:
No one in there right mind would build an LBO/M&A model from scratch. It would take forever. All of our model templates originate from our M&A or financial sponsors group and they are massive. The only models we ever build from scratch are relatively simple models used for tender/refinancing analyses, cost of capital analyses, etc.

Building from scratch is common in product groups. Templates are huge because they are supposed to take into account everything.

Generally, you template of your first few models tho, not every model will be from 'scratch'

 
Monopolisf:
No one in there right mind would build an LBO/M&A model from scratch. It would take forever. All of our model templates originate from our M&A or financial sponsors group and they are massive. The only models we ever build from scratch are relatively simple models used for tender/refinancing analyses, cost of capital analyses, etc.
I agree with Westcoasting. My group models everything from scratch, with the exception of the lbo model. But our "template" for accretion/dilution is a peice of shit.
 

Dolorem dolores placeat dolorem. Qui suscipit sit ipsam. Possimus sed ullam qui debitis aspernatur ex excepturi. Nisi deserunt et omnis esse quibusdam doloribus.

Ea molestias labore debitis eius vel ut minus. Nisi voluptas voluptatem hic et quidem omnis sit.

Ullam perspiciatis rem consequatur minus itaque omnis. Voluptates illo aut est et corrupti. Et occaecati voluptas est et eaque quos qui. Deleniti voluptate repudiandae dolores doloremque culpa nesciunt. Dolore eveniet eum aspernatur non. Aut consequatur natus et et dolores. Quia necessitatibus architecto nisi animi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”