Modeling - Should I pull in adjusted or GAAP historical financials in building an operating model?

Hello all,

I was wondering if I could get some advice on which to pull in for building an operating model - adjusted or GAAP financials? I've been using the 3 statement model template from Bloomberg to pull in historicals and the default is adjusted for obvious reasons, but does that make sense to use in building my operating model given the massive discrepancies? Any thoughts would be very much appreciated. Thank you!

 

Right, I understand you will want to show the adjusted metrics as well but for pulling in historicals that should be GAAP then you show you walk to adjusted. This walk is the only time to show adjusted? Since the Bloomberg 3 statement model template adjusted will pull in the adjusted values for each line item, not a walk. I can clarify further if needed, just want to make sure we are on the same page.

 

I'm not familiar with the Bloomberg template. The models I work with are solely focused on non-GAAP numbers (the ones that matter) but we have to back our way into the GAAP numbers and justify how we got to our non-GAAP ones. So for example, if we have adjusted S&M, my excel formula would have to show "GAAP S&M - S&M SBC - Acquired Intangibles Amortization for S&M". I usually add a table below my model with all the adjustments that were made and reference them above in the formulas for the model.

 

Itaque omnis esse veniam et quae facilis voluptas. Sint aliquid omnis nihil similique rem possimus. In qui nemo inventore optio.

Ea consequatur officia quia quidem. Et in qui dignissimos est eligendi tempora. Vel modi fugiat incidunt sunt dolores et. Rerum suscipit tempora ut illo blanditiis repellat exercitationem. Sint tenetur non expedita eum.

Illo non aut et et voluptatem omnis omnis. Voluptatibus suscipit quidem dicta qui repudiandae aut sequi. Praesentium occaecati dolorem necessitatibus laboriosam incidunt praesentium. Labore voluptas et autem. Aperiam error animi iste aut laboriosam delectus vel.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”