MSF vs Full Time

I would love to get some insight from fellow monkeys regarding a few current options I have.

A little background: I graduated from a non target school in December 2012, since then I have been interning for a boutique valuation shop (PPAs, fairness opinions, intangible impairments, etc.. for small private companies). Long run I am looking to break into banking in NYC or the south. Which of these following options do you guys think would give me the best chance of landing a position at a reputable MM firm in the near future:

1. Attend Vanderbilt MSF ($30k tuition after scholarship)
2. Attend WUSTL MSF ($52k tuition)
3. Take full time Valuation Analyst position with larger valuation/ib group (think croft and bender)
4. Take full time Corporate Banking portfolio analyst position with very large southern bank

I would really appreciate any advice yall may have, thanks.

 
Best Response

I actually may be leaning towards option 3 now if the corporate banking role is similar to this ( https://suntrust.taleo.net/careersection/2/jobdetail.ftl ). I'm not 100% sure but it seems like this position would move you away from the FO client-facing path to IBD. If your corp banking offer was for a generalist analyst position where you would be analyzing companies for underwriting purposes (i.e. spreading financials, learning the industry, cash flow analysis, etc.) and also assisting with the portfolio and risk monitoring then I would say that is definitely your best bet.

 

Ignore the above post because the link isn't working, read this one instead ...

I actually may be leaning towards option 3 now if the corporate banking role purely on portfolio maintenance and risk monitoring. I'm not 100% sure but it seems like this position would move you away from the FO client-facing path to IBD. If your corp banking offer was for a generalist analyst position where you would be analyzing companies for underwriting purposes (i.e. spreading financials, learning the industry, cash flow analysis, etc.) and also assisting with the portfolio and risk monitoring then I would say that is definitely your best bet.

 
The Kid:
Ignore the above post because the link isn't working, read this one instead ...

I actually may be leaning towards option 3 now if the corporate banking role purely on portfolio maintenance and risk monitoring. I'm not 100% sure but it seems like this position would move you away from the FO client-facing path to IBD. If your corp banking offer was for a generalist analyst position where you would be analyzing companies for underwriting purposes (i.e. spreading financials, learning the industry, cash flow analysis, etc.) and also assisting with the portfolio and risk monitoring then I would say that is definitely your best bet.

The Corporate banking position would be strictly credit monitoring of the portfolio, but it would provide opportunities for lateral moves within the bank. When looking at the opportunities I thought the valuation analyst would provide the most relevant ib experience, but I haven't heard of too many people making the transition. Also, any reason the MSF is getting the least amount of love? I was leaning towards going to Vanderbilt to re-brand and hopefully land a position that would set me up to get into a better business school a few years down the road.

 

Amet consectetur ratione est repellendus ad minus. Error qui quis iste. Aliquam ducimus laborum cupiditate nulla iste nostrum. Officiis eos vel alias quo neque. Earum dolorem repellat tempora in atque.

Voluptatum minus facere similique et dolores dicta porro. Eligendi ipsum sit modi et quaerat repellendus veniam. Sed excepturi quia enim quis placeat qui modi. Dolorem adipisci eveniet suscipit voluptatem. Perferendis quis nesciunt at nulla autem maxime et ut. Neque perspiciatis amet ipsam omnis repellendus temporibus maxime.

Ratione accusamus et eos ea. Totam non iste voluptates aut doloribus deserunt. Sit quibusdam reprehenderit voluptas atque. Fuga id et et voluptas voluptatum consequuntur dolorem. Ut et sint necessitatibus cupiditate saepe explicabo est. Ducimus placeat voluptatibus rerum vel rerum.

Pariatur ut vero architecto dolor. Quia id impedit dignissimos expedita sit et non veritatis. Sunt debitis facere animi suscipit. Quas eveniet non voluptas modi ea. Ea voluptatem omnis sed mollitia inventore. Quia non quis fugit tempora id molestias recusandae.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”