Most Helpful

I mean, it was completely obvious to anyone with a sober mind that the whole thing was hoax from start to finish. It was a Clinton conjured crisis meant to score political points and to undermine the legitimacy of the Trump presidency. There was no evidence presented at any point to substantiate the absurd assertion that the president was actually a Russian spy - a traitor.

The liberals and the media just kept driving the narrative because it was benefiting the democrats and it was great for ratings. You literally had people within CNN openly admit it was a hoax for ratings and yet, the left didn't care. People inside the government openly boasted about "insurance policies" and yet, the left didn't care. The hoax continued and the claims/accusations became more and more outrageous.

Anyone who questioned it was shamed and ridiculed. The liberals on this forum also regurgitated and participated in this nonsense for years. These guys aren't idiots. We're talking about people in IB, consulting, the buyside, etc.

Here are some examples (there are many, many more. Just too lazy to dig):

Alt-Ctr-Left:
The party of so-called patriotism is aiding and abetting treason, full stop. This website is supposedly full of the smartest six-figure-earning kids Wall Street has to offer, and some of you can't see the forest for the trees. I voted GOP for the first 8 years of eligibility, but never, ever again.

Treason? Really? Treason!?

iBankedUp:
Right now, the Russian investigation is at a point where they are close to learning about how close Trump was to associating with a foreign government about undermining our electoral system.

Mhmm, totally almost there.

BobTheBaker:
Russia isn't there huh? Cue Eric Trump Jr. releasing his new e-mails lmao. You sycophants will not accept that there is definitely a there there. I mean we are choking on Russia smoke right now but people want to claim there is no fire, it's both sad and hilarious at the same time.

Definitely a there there.

BobTheBaker:
We will continue to get more information on Russia as investigations go further, I think it will be an interesting exercise to watch how long the denial can last.

An interesting exercise indeed..

BobTheBaker:
You started with a post stating this whole Russia thing is a myth, a media creation. Evidence that clearly displays the intent to collude is presented. You go on to try and explain away said evidence with legal technicalities. You simply don't care about the truth.

What is it about liberalism that makes otherwise sober-minded people act like idiots and say things that are absolutely ridiculous? I mean, if you really bought into this nonsense, you need to reevaluate your worldview, because it drove you to absurdity.

This is not an interpretation. Your ideology made you look like an idiot. Come to terms with this fact - deal with it.

“Elections are a futures market for stolen property”
 
Esuric:
I mean, it was completely obvious to anyone with a sober mind that the whole thing was hoax from start to finish. It was a Clinton conjured crisis meant to score political points and to undermine the legitimacy of the Trump presidency. There was no evidence presented at any point to substantiate the absurd assertion that the president was actually a Russian spy - a traitor.

The liberals and the media just kept driving the narrative because it was benefiting the democrats and it was great for ratings. You literally had people within CNN openly admit it was a hoax for ratings and yet, the left didn't care. People inside the government openly boasted about "insurance policies" and yet, the left didn't care. The hoax continued and the claims/accusations became more and more outrageous.

Anyone who questioned it was shamed and ridiculed. The liberals on this forum also regurgitated and participated in this nonsense for years. These guys aren't idiots. We're talking about people in IB, consulting, the buyside, etc.

Here are some examples (there are many, many more. Just too lazy to dig):

Alt-Ctr-Left:
The party of so-called patriotism is aiding and abetting treason, full stop. This website is supposedly full of the smartest six-figure-earning kids Wall Street has to offer, and some of you can't see the forest for the trees. I voted GOP for the first 8 years of eligibility, but never, ever again.

Treason? Really? Treason!?

iBankedUp:
Right now, the Russian investigation is at a point where they are close to learning about how close Trump was to associating with a foreign government about undermining our electoral system.

Mhmm, totally almost there.

BobTheBaker:
Russia isn't there huh? Cue Eric Trump Jr. releasing his new e-mails lmao. You sycophants will not accept that there is definitely a there there. I mean we are choking on Russia smoke right now but people want to claim there is no fire, it's both sad and hilarious at the same time.

Definitely a there there.

BobTheBaker:
We will continue to get more information on Russia as investigations go further, I think it will be an interesting exercise to watch how long the denial can last.

An interesting exercise indeed..

BobTheBaker:
You started with a post stating this whole Russia thing is a myth, a media creation. Evidence that clearly displays the intent to collude is presented. You go on to try and explain away said evidence with legal technicalities. You simply don't care about the truth.

What is it about liberalism that makes otherwise sober-minded people act like idiots and say things that are absolutely ridiculous? I mean, if you really bought into this nonsense, you need to reevaluate your worldview, because it drove you to absurdity.

This is not an interpretation. Your ideology made you look like an idiot. Comes to terms with this fact - deal with it.

"While this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him" on whether he obstructed justice."

But go ahead and keep making shit up to worship your god, cultist lmao. I'm completely done with you far right retards. The only acceptable result of 2020 will be a President that completely takes down the far right Republican Party.

 

Dude, honest question - what in the hell is your point about trump “not being exonerated” on OOJ? Do you know how the legal system works? Do you know what a witch hunt actually refers to?

Do you realize that mueller said he didn’t find evidence of a crime - and now you want to demand someone to prove their innocence? You and a sizable portion of the Democratic Party are authoritarians who want to use law enforcement as a means to punish your political enemies like some sort of soviet regime.

Sad.

 

To be fair, part of me simply wanted to make a thread filled with snarky comments to make liberals feel stupid. I avoided that because at least on this forum, for the most part, they aren't that bad. I hope they'll start questioning their preferred media a bit more after this. It also seems that those media who pushed the narrative the most are not giving up by doubling down even further, joined by the likes of Bloomberg and FT. Disheartening but so be it.

Never discuss with idiots, first they drag you at their level, then they beat you with experience.
 
neink:
To be fair, part of me simply wanted to make a thread filled with snarky comments to make liberals feel stupid. I avoided that because at least on this forum, for the most part, they aren't that bad. I hope they'll start questioning their preferred media a bit more after this. It also seems that those media who pushed the narrative the most are not giving up by doubling down even further, joined by the likes of Bloomberg and FT. Disheartening but so be it.

Why would liberals feel stupid? Mueller's conclusions are great, because it would be absolutely terrible if Trump was actively colluding with a hostile foreign power to win an election. That doesn't wipe out the fact that multiple members of his campaign, high ranking and important members, have been found guilty of malfeasance.

And while I understand and respect the concept that one cannot prove a negative, Mueller's report is a long way from saying "Trump/his campaign are innocent". All it said was that there wasn't enough evidence to charge him with a crime.

 

This posts looks like it took you a lot of work, I hope it was satisfying. It looked like there was some smoke, so Mueller was tasked with investigating if there was a fire. Apparently there wasn't, which is fine.

Array
 
BobTheBaker:
This posts looks like it took you a lot of work, I hope it was satisfying. It looked like there was some smoke, so Mueller was tasked with investigating if there was a fire. Apparently there wasn't, which is fine.

This right here is the problem. It's not an issue that you dislike Trump or are critical of his presidency; it's that you continually asserted and regurgitated world altering "facts" without a hint of skepticism or nuance.

It's pathetic tribalism at its core. Stay classy Bob

 

It's good that you acknowledge there's no fire. It means that you can come to terms with reality and that you aren't dominated by bias. Unfortunately, it seems like many others aren't willing to let go. The false narrative is too fruitful for them, no matter how much it harms this country.

“Elections are a futures market for stolen property”
 

First long post was lost, so I'll keep it short with my thoughts

1) Thanks for letting me live rent-free in your head

2) I fully accept Mueller's findings, and it's a good thing for the country that the worst potential outcome of the litany of Trump investigations underway did not come to fruition. It seems that most of the "usual suspects" on here are doing the same. Meanwhile, many on the Right including Trump spent two years de-legitimizing Mueller but now are ready to fully accept his findings since they turned out favorable. Just an observation.

3) I look forward to reading the full Mueller report and try to better understand his scope and any investigations that were handed off to other jurisdictions. I won't opine on the threshold of proving crimes occurred to an unreasonable doubt, because I don't have a legal background.

4) Barr is a Trump appointee and is on the record saying sitting Presidents cannot be indicated for obstruction of justice, a decision he reached here in less than 48 hours. It's imperative for the country that we get to see the full Mueller report, not just Barr's summary.

5) This was not a witch hunt. Mueller returned convictions/guilty pleas from 34 individuals.

6) There are still a load of questions remaining that hopefully the full report will clarify. We saw with own eyes that Trump stood on a national stage and invited Wikileaks to hack Hillary's email, admitted he fired Comey over the "Russia thing", and that Don Jr. happily took a meeting with Russia intelligence assets, then lied about it. Why all the lying, misdirection, and falsified disclosure forms if you had nothing to hide?

7) This in no way changes my opinion that Trump is wholly unfit for the job, and it's disgraceful that our country's highest representative worships dictators, alienates allies, demonizes the half the country that doesn't like him, and is allegedly a money laundering, tax cheating, serial grifter (pending SDNY investigations!)

"I don't know how to explain to you that you should care about other people."
 

Esuric your presentation is a very nice spin on the facts.

Esuric:
it was completely obvious to anyone with a sober mind that the whole thing was hoax from start to finish

It wasn't that obvious. Anyone paying attention from the start knew Trump had a very targeted ad campaign online on Facebook, that he loves social media, and that there was tons of misinformation being spread.

I simply stated I wanted to see where this goes. During the campaign trail, no one could've known the success an online campaign like Trump's could've had because it was so unprecedented. That's not even really unique to Trump as privacy, data security, currency, etc, are all new and modernizing advances in our institutions.

As far as Trump being a spy, that's mere strawman. Anyone that knows the Cold War to a small degree will be able to understand the type of infowars that took place between Russia and the US. That hasn't been disputed and still remains as fact to this day; but we need the information on the Russian campaign and where that compares to the Trump one.

This investigation was highly politicized by the left. I don't think I fall within that camp. As part of no real political affiliation, I have the benefit of seeing things a little more clearly. You could've easily been on the wrong side of this as much as I could've been on the right side. What it comes down to is we needed to know the fact as Americans, and that's what we have, and that's all that really matters.

 
iBankedUp:
Esuric your presentation is a very nice spin on the facts.
Esuric:
it was completely obvious to anyone with a sober mind that the whole thing was hoax from start to finish

It wasn't that obvious. Anyone paying attention from the start knew Trump had a very targeted ad campaign online on Facebook, that he loves social media, and that there was tons of misinformation being spread.

I simply stated I wanted to see where this goes. During the campaign trail, no one could've known the success an online campaign like Trump's could've had because it was so unprecedented. That's not even really unique to Trump as privacy, data security, currency, etc, are all new and modernizing advances in our institutions.

As far as Trump being a spy, that's mere strawman. Anyone that knows the Cold War to a small degree will be able to understand the type of infowars that took place between Russia and the US. That hasn't been disputed and still remains as fact to this day; but we need the information on the Russian campaign and where that compares to the Trump one.

This investigation was highly politicized by the left. I don't think I fall within that camp. As part of no real political affiliation, I have the benefit of seeing things a little more clearly. You could've easily been on the wrong side of this as much as I could've been on the right side. What it comes down to is we needed to know the fact as Americans, and that's what we have, and that's all that really matters.

When Obama run a Facebook based campaign targeting potential voters, with FB admitting they helped him, he was called a genius. Trump does it and FB is all of a sudden the root of all evil.

What Trump did differently was using Twitter to personally communicate with voters, bypassing traditional corporate journalism because they never covered him with an inch of impartiality and that's something that will go down in history as a brilliant outmaneuvering tactic. The fact that corporate journalism couldn't resist giving him endless coverage, albeit negative, also shows Trump has a much better understanding of how media work than media exec themselves.

This collusion narrative in the end was merely the very same media trying to find an excuse for their abysimal work, so they tried to dig their way out of a hole and ended up digging a bigger one. NYT/WaPo/CNN/MSNBC have invested 2 years with a non-stop coverage about something that turned out to be absolutely nothing. Their reputation went from dented to crushed.

That being said, there's the technological component that needs to be discussed. One major change is that corporate media found that that ''anger drives clicks'', so in an attempt to boost their digital viewership, they have invested a lot in anger-inducing headlines, even when the story did not match the headline at all. The worst offenders are Vox, Buzzfeed and Vice, but the traditional media quickly caught up to that and eventually even right wing media like Breitbart figured out the formula. Obviously hinting that Trump was a traitor that had colluded with Russia resounded with many of disappointed Hillary voters looking for a reason to justify why reality was not matching their expectations.

Never discuss with idiots, first they drag you at their level, then they beat you with experience.
 

Spot on - now just wait until the OIG report comes out. Then the high level arrests begin. The amount of crow eating set to happen is going to be unheard of. Everything from election rigging/voter fraud, attempting to overthrow a duly elected president (FBI/CIA/Media assets conspiring with gov officials - both foreign and domestic), death threats, espionage/circumventing the constitution (5 Eyes spying), aiding and abetting our enemies (uranium one, Iran deal, Benghazi, fast and furious), selling of top secret programs (SAP's) to the highest bidder... which should never be in a single person's possession to begin with (HRC's basement server as well as Anthony Weiner's laptop), falsifying documents/perjury (Trump Dossier (Dems -> Perkins & Coie -> Fusion GPS -> Steel -> FBI -> MSM -> FISA warrants), Kavanaugh hearing, etc.), massive human/drug trafficking rings (reason why the wall is being fought against so strongly and one reason why Trump hates McCain/Flake (former Senators of Arizona/Traitors - key border state for inflow of trafficked goods).. Honestly the list goes on and on.

The web of those involved is massive and a tangled mess. There is a reason Trump is depicted as the most "hated" president via media/popular culture while simultaneously being one of the most loved to the common man. He's proven to be a man of his word and has taken on the constant onslaught of propaganda and lies. This entire 3 year process culminating in the Mueller report was a very important step for many reasons - but here are a few.

  1. They never thought Hillary would lose the election and thus they were not prepared. When Trump pulled off what was seen as a massive upset - Hillary, Obama, the intel community and all those involved realized they were in huge trouble. Their tracks had not been properly covered because it otherwise wouldn't have mattered. This led to a series of sloppy decisions, obvious lies, and false accusations (Papadopolous, Carter Page, etc.). As old Honest Abe once said "No man has a good enough memory to be a successful liar." Throughout their hearings this has been proven time and time again. Furthermore, on his way out, Obama pardoned everyone involved of all federal crimes... But in the meantime, Trump has the greatest intel apparatus on earth on his side - the US military (why he's always 10 steps ahead of his enemies). Trump proceeded to play along while more than likely flipping a fair number of top offenders. While they spied on Trump, Trump knew all along and was performing counterintelligence. Given the 2-3 year investigation, Trump has cycled a number of people in and out of his cabinet to play select roles and depict a certain public image. They all played their parts wonderfully while the true investigation was going on in the background led by people like AG John Huber, select tribunals, and others.

  2. People have gradually been waking up to the lies and deceit and will hopefully be able to stomach the entirety of what's to come. When every single week there is a new blatantly fake news story - the public generally starts to take notice. The MSM's (propaganda arm of the deep state) credibility is at an all time low and people are beginning to realize the obvious angles. With all of that said, the Mueller report marked the beginning of Trump's counter attack.

 

He's going to have to win reelection for any of that to happen. It's going to get really ugly. A lot of powerful people have way too much to lose. I think I'll tune out and just show up on election day.

“Elections are a futures market for stolen property”
 
Esuric:
Alt-Ctr-Left:
The party of so-called patriotism is aiding and abetting treason, full stop. This website is supposedly full of the smartest six-figure-earning kids Wall Street has to offer, and some of you can't see the forest for the trees. I voted GOP for the first 8 years of eligibility, but never, ever again.

Treason? Really? Treason!?

“Somebody said treasonous. I mean, yeah, I guess, why not. Can we call that treason? Why not?” — Donald Trump, on Democrats who didn't applaud for him at the State of the Union

"I don't know how to explain to you that you should care about other people."
 
Henri Poincaré:
We know the Russian government undertook active measures to support Donald Trump's candidacy. We know Trump's inner circle were consistently lying to investigators. Jeff Sessions lied to Congress about Kislyak. Kushner lied on his clearance forms multiple times. We know for certain that Donald Trump fired Comey due to "the Russia thing." We have audio of Republican leadership talking about Russians paying Rohrabacher and Trump. Even if all of these things were just strange coincidences, which is possible, these are things that desperately needed to be investigated.

Was anything said here that you specifically disagree with...?

Array
 
Esuric:
And it persists. 2 years of left wing attack dogs finding nothing, but WSO has the answers!!

What? Are you serious? Mueller is a respected Republican lawyer. Appointed by a fully GOP-controlled Congress. You want a biased "attack dog"? Go back through the years and millions of dollars of GOP investigations on Benghazi.

Look, whatever your thoughts on the investigation, or Trump, or Mueller are, you cannot sit there and maintain any credibility at all if you describe the Mueller Report as an example of "left wing attack dogs". Nothing could be further from the truth, and to say otherwise is to betray a complete lack of impartiality, common sense, and even intelligence.

 

But they didn't find nothing...?

I'm not as invested in the situation as some are but just to be clear, some of Trump's closest confidants/allies/business partners (whatever you want to call them are going to jail for crimes they committed while working for him, right?

It isn't crazy to think that Trump "could" have been involved. Granted, being able to prove that level of involvement may not have been reached.

Americans are so strange. There was a possibility of corruption in your federal government. Even if it was a 1% chance, wouldn't you want to double-check that possibility? Instead of being happy that core values of justice/truth/etc. are being maintained, y'all are just throwing handfuls of dogshit across the party line at the other political party for "winning".

 

Your skill at moving the goalposts for this investigation are impressive. Now it's no longer direct Russian-Trump-collusion, it's "the president is incompetent". Just admit you were wrong like a grown adult and move forward.

 

Great news for Trump, but he’s not out of the clear yet. Mueller handed off quite a few investigations regarding Trump’s campaign team and the Trump Organization to state prosecutors (particularly NY). Those are still ongoing, and if anybody’s convicted in those investigations, Trump can’t pardon them.

 

None, because the report said that they couldn't find evidence of collusion and deem Mr. President not guilty.

Since it doesn't say innocent, it means he's not innocent.

 

Everyone is so tough behind a keyboard.

This reminds me of a certain football kicker named Cody Parkey. When he missed what many called an easy 43 yard field goal to send the Bears onward, many took to twitter explaining that even they could have made that kick.

Goose Island Beer Co. called those tough guys on it. They put out a tweet that said something like, "You sit on your lazy boy with Busch Light, hot wings, and Doritos and explain how easy kicking a game winning field goal is. Well come and show us. Anyone who can make a 43 yard field goal (without the defensive rush) will get airfare, hotel and entry to any regular season NFL game during the 2019 season."

100 tough guys showed up, one wearing their top tier private high school football jersey, to show Mr. Parker how it's done.

Guess how many made it.

Some of the even tougher guys who didn't bother to show up took to twitter again to say, "I could have easily won that package."

Incredible that those working some bottom rung back office job know more than the actual investigators combing through minutia to find collusion.

 

I'll add to this I guess.

I'd like to consider myself a left leaning independent (If that's a thing...)... the typical "fiscally conservative, socially liberal" person.

I'm not personally a fan of Trump but I think we have to take it as is and face the facts.

The fact is that the investigation either found nothing solid or was conducted in a manner where perhaps not enough effort / resources / time were spent to be able to find anything (All the Trump hate rhetoric was out there, everyone took the chance to pounce and decided to advocate for an investigation, maybe in hindsight it was done inefficiently, at the wrong time, in the wrong manner, etc.)

Point is the left overplayed their hand, turned a 4OAK and were greeted by a Royal Flush.

 
FinancelsWacc:
The fact is that the investigation either found nothing solid or was conducted in a manner where perhaps not enough effort / resources / time were spent to be able to find anything (All the Trump hate rhetoric was out there, everyone took the chance to pounce and decided to advocate for an investigation, maybe in hindsight it was done inefficiently, at the wrong time, in the wrong manner, etc.)

Point is the left overplayed their hand, turned a 4OAK and were greeted by a Royal Flush.

Again, as I've said before, "the left" overplayed nothing. Mueller is a Republican, appointed by a Republican-controlled government. Moreover, the investigation absolutely found something solid. Manafort, Gates, Cohen, Stone.... all of these guys have been indicted or convicted, and all of their testimony has turned up other evidence of malfeasance by the Trumps (which Mueller, to his great credit, refused to investigate as being beyond his mandate). Contrast that to the millions of wasted dollars and explicit political motivations of the Benghazi hearings, which turned up zero evidence of any kind of malfeasance.

Look, there was absolutely enough smoke to warrant an investigation, and that investigation DID discover crimes and shady activity. But the report has said that Donald Trump was probably not involved in colluding with the Russians, and that should close the book on that. And good riddance. However, what bothers me is that this one small instance of exoneration is going to completely overshadow the many other instances where Donald Trump is eroding democratic norms, or using the Presidency to make money, or treating his Presidency as little more than an opportunity to campaign for 2020 and demonize his opponents. The Russia issue was one tiny facet of the many ways in which President Trump is harming the country, and always the least likely to be true (or at least, least likely that President Trump was actively and knowingly involved).

 

Sorry maybe I should have specified. Everything I said was from the Russia Collusion perspective.

I agree that the investigation did produce insightful findings, apart from Russia which Mueller didn't look at too deeply because it was past his scope.

It's interesting to me because we're back at the start again. Smoke was there with the Russia debacle and Mueller looked into it. Now Mueller found more smoke, the questions now is if we'll decide to look into that as well.

 

I'm on the side of Trumpites getting a victory doesn't hurt me, it helps them, and it keeps our country from going further into the shitter. Every time Trump dodges a bullet, we all dodge one since the 2016 election. None of this is real, because if Trump just did his job the way it should be done, we wouldn't go through any of this. How hard is it to just be a talking head?

 

If this is the place to air the dirty laundry of previous bad opinions, let me nominate the following from an old thread: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/lets-talk-russia

TNA:

Russia did absolutely nothing to help Trump win. He ran as a RINO and HRC allowed herself to be hijacked by the fringe left. Centrists win elections and that is what Trump is.

Love how you keep pimping this bullshit lie that Russia had anything to do with Hillary losing.

Unless Putin controls Comey and the FBI, Russia did nothing to help Trump win.

"I don't know how to explain to you that you should care about other people."
 
Alt-Ctr-Left:
If this is the place to air the dirty laundry of previous bad opinions, let me nominate the following from an old thread: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/lets-talk-russia
TNA:

Russia did absolutely nothing to help Trump win. He ran as a RINO and HRC allowed herself to be hijacked by the fringe left. Centrists win elections and that is what Trump is.

Love how you keep pimping this bullshit lie that Russia had anything to do with Hillary losing.

Unless Putin controls Comey and the FBI, Russia did nothing to help Trump win.

What ever happened to TNA? He was kind of funny at times.

http://www.series7examtutor.com
 

In the end I don't think this will change people's political opinions much, those who either support or do not support Trump seem to have chosen their sides based on dozens of reasons of which possible Russian collusion was only one, myself included. And many seem on both sides seem to believe that anything that goes against their narrative is automatically false. So I think 90% of the outcome for 2020 is already decided.

Having said that, based on what's been divulged, it's entirely possible that Mueller's report includes something like..."The pee tape does exist, we have it. But we found no evidence that it was used in any sort of collusion activities." This is an extreme example, but shows how little we really do know until the full report is released. Though as a liberal, my opinion, and the opinions of most others I know, are that we would accept Mueller's findings (once they are fully divulged), and even if the outcome is squeaky clean would not believe that the investigation was a waste of time, nor in any way illegal.

On that note, my biggest worry is seeing calls from the right to use this to legally punish the free press, and even political figures out of pure speculation or from "evidence" coming from ACTUAL fake news. That, combined with trump alluding to such things himself, and even being the one spreading some of these false stories or information from time to time is leading towards some third world dictatorship level shit.

And the criticism of the MSM at large (people seem to be conflating some sensationalist CNN programs to represent all of the free press in general) is an outrageous double standard in light of Fox News's coverage of Clinton, ranging from emails to benghazi to seth rich. I laugh at these politicians asking the MSM to apologize when most at least have the journalistic integrity to publish corrections or otherwise acknowledge when something ended up being false, whereas Fox never said a word even after retracting the Seth Rich story and after releasing a headline that Clinton was indicted over her emails.

 
trustmeimanengineer:
Bro you realize Fox News is one outlet and that the MSM is, basically, every other organization. Y'all need to really examine your thoughts on the MSM if you're worried about ONE outlet. Sheesh dude.

NBC, ABC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN, ESPN, Disney, E!, and many more. That doesn't even include the written media... If you are going to say all of those viewerships are equal to Fox News... Whew. Re-examine your thinking

One outlet that has the highest viewership (#1 name in news!) and represents the only on air news source for more than 30% of the population. That’s significant. But regardless, sample size doesn’t change the fact that there is a double standard. And who the hell groups ESPN, E and Disney in with those other outlets? Bro get your head examined

 

Ex sint reiciendis tenetur id aut repellat et impedit. Blanditiis vel sit praesentium aut similique est.

Fugit autem est rem laudantium laboriosam. Et ea ab at eaque explicabo ea sed velit. Sit dolorum et sint.

Ut adipisci consequatur veniam temporibus eos quidem. Ut velit architecto impedit commodi. Qui inventore labore consectetur voluptate assumenda repellat perferendis. Eius amet quos excepturi omnis et et. Qui architecto et vero ab. Et esse et cum magni ullam quis possimus.

Omnis tempore deleniti molestiae. Quasi blanditiis cupiditate odit et. Id consequatur molestias enim officia magnam necessitatibus. Voluptas dolorem adipisci officia dolores accusantium laudantium veniam. Ut temporibus ut nisi ex aliquid.

 

Aspernatur consectetur ipsam incidunt eos. Placeat illo quam asperiores quaerat repudiandae sint vel aperiam. Ab fuga voluptates harum odio officiis dolores. Vitae voluptates sed qui veritatis ducimus voluptatem commodi. Sed quod maxime deserunt officia est repudiandae perspiciatis.

Doloremque nihil deleniti eum sequi. Numquam dolor reprehenderit rerum error deserunt voluptas a. Vel et blanditiis quam laudantium illum corrupti officiis sed.

Enim iste aperiam voluptate voluptas sed amet voluptate. Necessitatibus dicta aperiam omnis qui nisi nihil vitae. Sit eius rerum expedita enim et. Unde sint fuga culpa molestias saepe natus rerum. Consectetur voluptas iusto unde sit fugiat.

Commercial Real Estate Developer
 

Minima aliquid maiores sunt recusandae. Delectus qui quisquam dolore ipsum ut. Et velit dicta reiciendis et harum. Dolores beatae cupiditate qui asperiores et eos.

Inventore iusto quia voluptas magni voluptatem asperiores. Aspernatur consectetur quos minima eveniet amet et. Delectus illum veritatis et vitae laboriosam.

Nam incidunt numquam accusamus tempora assumenda sequi quae. Sequi at est eligendi deserunt nam odio. Dicta voluptas odio dolor molestias accusamus sed quia dolores. Accusamus nam sunt neque sint.

Aperiam ea accusantium excepturi omnis vitae porro aut qui. Error incidunt culpa est in officiis consequatur. Atque temporibus ut omnis. Perferendis nostrum nostrum doloremque nobis incidunt.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”