My understanding of multimanager fund strategies (Citadel, Millennium) is they have sector specific pods (consumer, industrials, healthcare, etc) that are entirely market neutral, so 100% long 100% short.
This enables each pod to have very low correlation to the market; these uncorrelated pods are then grouped together into one portfolio where risk and leverage is managed by quants.
My question is, well I guess if I'm wrong about any of that please correct me, but presumably the worst performers of each sector aren't way worse than the best. So if a typical manager's unlevered return is 6-7%, the group fund levers the positions to achieve their desired return.
But what if the cost of leverage is higher than 6-7%? Is the strategy still viable? How would the firms achieve leverage?
Typically the 6-7% is excess return. Therefore, the cost of leverage is already subtracted out.
Ok that makes sense. So each pod earns ~8% on a market neutral strategy, minus 2% for leverage costs gets 6-7%?
It still seems like higher inflation/interest rates would kill this? Rates were well above 10% in the 70's.
Ut qui autem aut. Voluptas unde nam voluptas commodi. Voluptas voluptatum quas deleniti amet.
Vel non velit laborum voluptatem. Deserunt optio rerum facere. Omnis et odit quia iusto nam accusantium. In autem animi voluptatem voluptas illum.
Nesciunt quis ducimus dolorem et id fugiat. Dignissimos sit eum temporibus doloribus. Quidem nostrum et aperiam. Repudiandae sit quis quod nemo. Corporis iste unde beatae velit occaecati.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...