Trending Content
| +81 | Q&A - Buyside Equity Research Analyst/PM | 29 | 5d | |
| +32 | How the heck do you learn all of this stuff? | 10 | 14s | |
| +28 | Getting Frustrated | 10 | 4w | |
| +28 | My experience on the sell side | 20 | 2w | |
| +24 | Clues in Financial Reporting Analysis | 7 | 1d | |
| +17 | Am i fairly compensated? | 9 | 2d | |
| +14 | Data Science to PM | 8 | 1w | |
| +14 | Heard they don’t model at Oppenheimer | 10 | 2w | |
| +12 | ER - Remote Jobs? | 8 | 5d | |
| Equity Research at Bank vs IG, High Yield & Leveraged Loans Research at Asset Manager | 4 | 16h |
Career Resources
Analyst > bank.
That said, some MMs have very good research. I'm consistently impressed by Raymond James research. It's more readable than a lot of the BB research, which sounds absurd 90% of the time e.g. "trendable event with catalysts to the upside".
Agreed. It's entirely based on the analysts at the firm and many firms will specialize on a sector based around their main analyst. Really depends on what space you're interested in. I'm in resources and I will say that the material released by the US bb's is generally garbage so you'd be much better positioned at a smaller firm that specializes in the space. I think it's a similiar situation in tech although someone more knowledgable in the space can chime in there.
thanks a lot. do you happen to know if Raymond James has a good summer internship programme?
KBW is pretty good too for FIG
RW Baird?
How's Stifel? Just going through associates' profiles on linkedin, I saw many went to semi/non targets.
thanks a lot to all, really helpful replies
Take a look at the link in the sell side ER thread (right under this one) - basically talks about how BB's are much more prone to the "everything's a buy" bias compared to independents. Something to consider.
I'm going to go against the grain here. If I was on the buyside (and not at a firm that needed analysts for mgmt access), I would use independents.
But for internships, I would look at BBs and solid MMs. Nobody knows "XYZ boutique" but everybody knows Credit Suisse ER. The analyst > bank rule still applies, but big-name firms help with branding. The analysts are also more well known, because they send out their research to almost everyone, not just subscribers. That said, if I wanted to stay in SS ER, I would go for Sanford Bernstein or something similar.
Just reread my post and wanted to clarify I mentioned semi/nontargets from a recruiting/networking perspective, not as an indication of quality.
Dolores porro esse distinctio et rerum facere voluptatibus illo. Iure molestias veniam id sed placeat quia cum iusto. Aliquam excepturi necessitatibus aspernatur qui voluptate. Reprehenderit sint atque similique qui facere aut. Aperiam minus consectetur inventore cupiditate sit ad.
Magnam iure omnis similique deleniti at facere. Sed voluptatum nulla impedit debitis asperiores.
Qui molestiae aspernatur quia est sit. Voluptas unde sed eum exercitationem quibusdam sapiente labore. Ratione esse et voluptatem accusantium.
Deserunt non voluptatem dolores impedit. Commodi perferendis dignissimos non similique repudiandae. Unde eos reprehenderit nesciunt ex nisi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...