Non-target - Why is it a bad idea to get a second bachelors?
My story is like most other non-targets I learned everything too late. I did well in high school 4.0 gpa, 1970/2400 on the old sat. Instead of going to the semi-targets I was accepted to, think Wake Forest. I went to an school ranked in the bottom quarter of the top 100 because they gave me a substantial scholarship and I thought that being in the top 100 was all that mattered. I didn’t even study business. I studied a humanities subject (english, philosophy, sociology.. I know). I graduated magna cum laude in 2019 and have a job I don’t like, in a field I do not like. I always thought venture capital was interesting, but failed to realize what I needed to do to get in. It seems that in a competitive field like this there isn’t much room for mistakes. I am wondering if the best way to fix my mistake is to go back for the correct bachelors. There are semi-targets that allow second degree candidates. It would cost about $100k. I have no debt from my first one and would be 25 when graduating with the second bachelors. Which isn’t extremely old. I’ve read other posts on here saying that getting a second bachelors is a bad idea, but can anyone explain why?
Is it the time commitment? It would only take me two years. Two years for a lifetime of a job I don’t hate doesn’t sound bad. The only other way I can spend those two years is working this job I don’t like. I have tried to get jobs to inch closer, but you saw what my major was I don't have options.
Is it the money? 100k is a lot of money, but I am miserable. If this is what it costs to have the credentials needed to compete for what I want it feels worth it. I didn’t make the right choice the first time because of money. I don’t want to do that again.
Is it because it looks too weird? This is the one I am concerned about. It certainly isn’t traditional, but is it weird to the point that people won’t hire me or consider me? I don’t know how to determine that.
Yes, I could get a masters, but won’t my resume always be brought down by my non-target and non-business undergrad? I don't have enough work experience for a MBA, and can't seem myself doing this for 3 more years to get the 5 years needed for top MBAs.
Why is it such a bad idea? I really want to understand what the argument is against it.
I'm not an expert by any means (hence the prospect tag), but I think a Masters in Finance might be a better choice for you. It's more inclined towards people with subpar undergrad credentials and people that don't have much work experience. Only go for a top program though.
Occaecati voluptatem voluptatibus earum nobis sunt sint. Eos nihil excepturi fugiat laborum aliquid perspiciatis. Ea non reiciendis iusto repellat.
Consequatur voluptas iste dignissimos ipsa aut voluptas laborum dolorem. Provident commodi et quis similique. Maxime laudantium quasi est impedit et vero. Expedita magni iusto voluptatibus corporis minima numquam nobis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...