is there a huge difference between 3.8 and 3.9 (or 4.0) from a top target / good banking group? or is it just a tick in the box thing..

 

thanks! do recruiters rank candidates in the same group even if it's a top group?

 
Most Helpful

I didn't participate in on cycle, so take this with a grain of salt. I have seen dozens of UMM/MF PE associate resumes and have discussed this topic with H/S b-school buddies.

Headhunters score your profile. I don't know what formula it is. It could be 50 points for resume, 25 points for deal experience & technical skills, 25 points for behavioral & fit. Diversity and personal connections are extra credit. The earlier you recruit, the more they rely on your resume. They're risk averse.

Your resume consists of your banking group (most important), school, GPA, scores, former internships, etc. Allocate the points how you may and be realistic in scoring yourself.

The top ~10 or so funds interview whoever they want. There are enough candidates that score perfect or near perfect on the HH rubric that those candidates fill most interview slots. That only leaves a handful of spots for 3.7s GPAs, or semi-targets, or mid-tier banking groups.

There may be 25 UMM funds. Some candidates that score near perfect will land in these funds - maybe they wanted a direct promotion opportunity, maybe they got the offer the first day and took it. A 3.7 semi-target at BAML is an acceptable profile, but it certainly is not above average.

Re-orient your brain for what is good enough, as you now have a new comp set. People will say that a 3.7 is the cutoff for banking. There are 5x as many investment banking analysts as there are UMM/MF PE spots. Your entire competition now has BB / EB banking, 3.5+ GPAs. Top PE firms can, and will, be selective enough to differentiate between a 3.7 and a 3.9, and between Boston College and Wharton. You have no actual work experience yet, and they have limited resources to conduct interviews.

It's your choice on how to allocate your time. If you have a 3.6 from a semi-target and want UMM / MF interviews, you better believe that having a 780 GMAT will help your resume. Maybe you decide an extra 2 points on your HH rubric isn't worth it because you think the time is better spent elsewhere, or maybe you aren't sure you can get a 750+ in the first place. It's not a decision someone on WSO can make for you.

This is less relevant in the MM, where having a solid banking group alone is sufficient at most places. There are just more seats in MM PE.

But for the love of god, please no more of the "my profile is x y z, should I take the GMAT or try to improve my GPA."

 

If you profile is “average”, would you recommend recruiting off cycle or perhaps waiting a year to acquire deal experience? Could this mitigate the less-than-stellar resume? Thanks!

 

My sample size on this is much smaller so it is hard for me to say with certainty. The timeline has moved up so recently that recruiting as a second year has only been common for the last year or two.

I don't think your profile changes dramatically as a second year analyst, versus a first year. It can improve if you work on multiple $10bn+ deals, or it can be weaker if you haven't closed one at all.

The benefit of recruiting as a second year is that you have more time to develop on the analytical and fit side (the other 50%, that I outlined). You should have a stronger foundation of financial modeling concepts and well developed reasons for why you want PE and what you are looking in your next role. I recommend this route for those who have limited technical or investing experience and are simply following the herd mentality of private equity recruiting. Harder to say whether that will tangibly lead to interviews at larger funds.

I can't speak to growth/VC interview processes. My understanding is that the top 10 funds are equally selective (if not more) than the top PE funds. I would recommend checking LinkedIn of your target funds and reviewing the associate profiles.

 

Minus doloribus ea ipsum. Autem eligendi et exercitationem praesentium. Aliquid at similique omnis fugit veniam sint. Quibusdam nam voluptatibus est quos quidem deleniti. Iure nulla vel quisquam nostrum nihil vitae.

Quaerat id eius qui quam quam. Dolor similique commodi rem quo quis voluptatibus. Incidunt accusamus unde optio beatae saepe. Tempora corrupti aut soluta ex et debitis consequatur non.

 

Quia a accusantium excepturi odit aut non. Recusandae iste repellendus qui nisi. Aut sunt qui non magnam delectus. Necessitatibus cupiditate recusandae dolor earum ipsum ullam amet.

Corrupti commodi distinctio deleniti laboriosam ut. Eos eaque repudiandae minima tempore ipsam qui aut. Iure sunt autem nemo sit laudantium. Cumque consequatur suscipit molestiae sed.

Eaque ex sed vitae eaque dolores dolorem aliquam consequatur. Assumenda dicta fugiat repellendus aut. Totam quibusdam tenetur sit ea nam ut quo dolorem. Et dolore non reprehenderit praesentium non magnam corporis. Nam sit cumque atque voluptas consequatur non.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (21) $586
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (89) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (204) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (386) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (28) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (313) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”