Personal Trainer

Incoming IB analyst in NYC. What do you guys think of hiring a personal trainer in the gym? Is there gonna be enough time or should I just stick to working out on my own when I have the time?

 

I incline to hire one as well (on a hourly basis). It's easy to workout in a wrong way and injure yourself before you even realize it. E.g. most ppl are clueless about how to protect the knees when jogging.

The Auto Show
 

It's easy to protect your knees while you jog. Get in your Rolls Royce and have your driver drive you from point A to point B.

Follow the shit your fellow monkeys say @shitWSOsays Life is hard, it's even harder when you're stupid - John Wayne
 

Concur with notthehospitalER - if you don't know the first thing about working out/nutrition, then a personal trainer can be a good place to start, especially since you likely won't want to spend your valuable free time learning it on your own. If you know what you're doing though, do it yourself! There's a ton of great resources out there to help you achieve whatever fitness goal you want.

 

Contrary to everyone's opinions above, there are no problems with having a personal trainer. The real problem is that in order to achieve meaningful / visual results is that the volume of workouts has to be more than 2-3 times a week. If you want to actually change your body and improve your health, 4-5 times / week will get you there but that's not only unrealistic as you'll be working 80-100 hrs / week but also expensive. From my experience, not in NY, trainers are about 50 / session. Do it 4-5 times a week and that's some serious coin every month.

 

I dont know the going rate in the UK, but in the States I trained with a top notch trainer at the local gym for 35/hr. Well worth it, I went from 175(my injury riddled post-varsity sports days) to 150 in 2 months, not mention I got cut up. The most important thing you have to know is its not the trainer, it's you that controls your gains. The trainer will give you a great plan, which is worth the 35 dollars an hr,(but in your case £50 is pushing it) and your results come from following that plan. Id recommend if you just want to lose weight, do the tabata regimen(google it) as it is a great way to work out without a gym membership or pricy trainer. But good luck.

 

here ill be your personal trainer:

-eat less cals than you burn. if you burn 2500 a day then eat 2000, for a one pound a week loss. there are calculators to figure how much you burn a day

-work out at least 3 times a week. hit each muscle 2x times a week. i.e. 2 chest exercises then your done for the week, but work hard.

-eat one gram of protein per pound of lean body mass. most likly around 150 grams of protein. make sure to include that into your total cals for the day.

thats all you need, dont let any gimmick tell you otherwise

 
Therightcoast:
here ill be your personal trainer:

-eat less cals than you burn. if you burn 2500 a day then eat 2000, for a one pound a week loss. there are calculators to figure how much you burn a day

-work out at least 3 times a week. hit each muscle 2x times a week. i.e. 2 chest exercises then your done for the week, but work hard.

-eat one gram of protein per pound of lean body mass. most likly around 150 grams of protein. make sure to include that into your total cals for the day.

thats all you need, dont let any gimmick tell you otherwise

Seeing as 3,500 calories = 1 pound. If you burn 2,500 calories a day and are consuming 2,000 calories a day (and not gaining weight at this intake level), you will lose 5 pounds in a week. This is not healthy or sustainable. You need that 2,000 to function throughout the day (well 2,000 is stated, but this differs for people on basis of metabolism and other criteria).

A better way to gauge caloric intake/out-take is to consult your physician or dietician and develop an ideal weight for your height and frame. From this point, you can stage a goal net caloric intake to reach the desired weight. You are best suited to consume more than the net caloric intake and burn the difference through a medium or high intensity exercise plan. This way you are building muscle strength and flexibility to accompany your weight reduction.

 
Best Response
tools.of.the.trade:
Therightcoast:
here ill be your personal trainer:

-eat less cals than you burn. if you burn 2500 a day then eat 2000, for a one pound a week loss. there are calculators to figure how much you burn a day

-work out at least 3 times a week. hit each muscle 2x times a week. i.e. 2 chest exercises then your done for the week, but work hard.

-eat one gram of protein per pound of lean body mass. most likly around 150 grams of protein. make sure to include that into your total cals for the day.

thats all you need, dont let any gimmick tell you otherwise

Seeing as 3,500 calories = 1 pound. If you burn 2,500 calories a day and are consuming 2,000 calories a day (and not gaining weight at this intake level), you will lose 5 pounds in a week. This is not healthy or sustainable. You need that 2,000 to function throughout the day (well 2,000 is stated, but this differs for people on basis of metabolism and other criteria).

A better way to gauge caloric intake/out-take is to consult your physician or dietician and develop an ideal weight for your height and frame. From this point, you can stage a goal net caloric intake to reach the desired weight. You are best suited to consume more than the net caloric intake and burn the difference through a medium or high intensity exercise plan. This way you are building muscle strength and flexibility to accompany your weight reduction.

I hope you are not in banking... unless im thinking about this completely wrong... if you burn 500 calories per day more than you consume, and 3,500 calories is 1 pound... you burn an extra 3,500 calories per week... therefore burning off a pound per week... not 5 pounds per week...

 

Quas error repellendus omnis. Sequi fugiat labore excepturi aut ex. Quibusdam rerum reprehenderit asperiores. Non quisquam a voluptates a sit consequuntur. Dolorem placeat optio quia sit omnis.

Esse ipsam sunt autem facere et mollitia. Occaecati consequatur et rem cupiditate corporis. Sapiente consequatur ut natus perferendis odio aut qui.

A dolores cupiditate iste accusantium animi impedit provident facere. Eius ipsam possimus consequatur tempore minus consequuntur aperiam. Voluptatem officia sint a aut. Dolorem debitis iste cum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”