Placement Agent Fees?
Assume the following:
- $50M fundraising target.
- $8M GP commit
- GP raises another $10M independently.
- Excellent IRR, but GP hasn't deployed much historically, meaning good chance of strategic drift.
- Emerging manager.
Questions:
- Is this too small for any reputable placement agent to get involved?
- Expected fee structure?
- GP commit is above average (I think?) based on Preqin but no clue how accurate that data is. Thoughts?
- Better to raise a small $25M fund and resolve potential worries about strategic drift, then start raising a subsequent fund quickly?
Not too small for a decent agent to raise. Depending on circumstances I have seen anywhere from 2-5% (5% for more venture, direct deals that are not easy raises), I have seen the fee being lower but then the agent is allocated carry, I have also seen retainers in the 10-15k per month range (I have seen 10k for 6 months most often). I would think you can do something in the 3%ish range maybe with a small retainer but without more info hard to say.
Thank you for information & offer on the PM side. Probably a little early yet as we're finalizing a few decision/need to make 1 - 2 key hires.
I can get you in touch with someone if you PM me. Right in their wheel house (EM, smaller fund size, not as much track record).
This is definitely not too small for a reputable placement agent to take on. From my experience, the fees are usually one year’s management fee (1.5% - 2%). Retainers are subjective based on the upfront work needed (I have seen 0k - 300k lump sum or 15k - 30k per quarter). The economics are usually negotiable especially for smaller fund sizes. GP commit is definitely above market. Most funds I’ve seen are in the 1% - 2% range. Unrelated to placement agents, but you will also want to consider whether to add a preferred return (market for PE is 8% while a lot of VCs forego the pref.). Please feel free to shoot me a PM.
Thanks for the help. Any specific firms you would recommend in that range?
I sent you a PM.
Bump
As an institutional LP, I can say with 100% confidence that no reputable placement agency firm will go for a $50mn fundraise. After the GP commit, you are looking at $42mn in external capital. Most pension fund type LPs will have minimum check size requirements of at least 10mn and that is assuming the smallest, most risk-leaning LPs. From the placement agent's point of view, it will be a lot of work to place that capital relative to the fees they can generate. I think you are best off looking at smaller placement agents that have contacts with HNWI, which would be your ideal LP base.
I mean 'reputable' is very subjective right. Most 'reputable' funds spend more on advisors yearly than the entire capitalization of this proposed fund. I reckon you can get a decent agent as long as you don't think you'll get a MM or up advisor
Makes sense. RE: institutional capital, seems like a few intuitional allocators have emerging manager programs that are happy to commit smaller amounts. Like you pointed out though, family offices will be the best source of capital. In an ideal world capital would be sourced from a handful of family offices with pertinent experience that can help fill a few gaps.
Response:
1) Definition of "reputable" aside - I've seen a a couple of agents charge 2% (for the size you are seeking), and then 1% on the next fund if those investors circle back.
I don't recall a retainer, or it was negligible. Target LPs were mix of small family office and HNW/UHNW
2) GP commitment (is this 1-2 individuals?) is above average when considering size of fundraise
3) Going to throw this out there - why not just go fundless? With $50M target for a fund, your going to have concentration constraints and you don't have much flexibility on the strategy shift (though your LP base may not care either way). The $50M is going to put you in a tight box for deals, and your investors may actually prefer to look at opportunities on a deal by deal basis. I understand the downfalls of being in constant fundraising mode for each deal and the lack of certainity of mangement fees, but I think you could actually get better carry economics, have more latitude in strategy, and you can build up a track record with high conviction deals with fewer constraints under a fund model. (PM me if you'd like to chat more)
Magnam maxime delectus ab molestiae aliquam rerum nostrum. Suscipit quia voluptas saepe ullam eligendi quod. Quis in quia alias qui. Delectus et qui earum. Libero sed corporis blanditiis voluptas ipsum sint. Animi enim labore aut maxime nobis quis possimus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...