Please Help with PE Interview Brain Teaser!!!!!

Hey guys -

I received insight that I will be asked a brain teaser very similar to the one below (numbers / %s made up) but I am stuck on how I would even go about solving. The person who told me said only one person has ever gotten the answer right and its all about how I would think about solving. I tried to explain it to the best of my knowledge below and would greatly appreciate your thoughts (feel free to PM if you prefer). Thanks in advance!

--------------------------------------------------------

You have a medical company that produces cholesterol medicine and is in the process of being FDA approved. There are five stages of approval and the likelihood of the drug getting passed through each stage is outlined below. The company has already passed stage 1 and has four left to go.

Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5
20% 40% 80% 60% 50%

Assumptions:
• You are given an upfront cost (call it $50mm for now)
• If the drug passes stage 5, the drug will be worth roughly $200mm

Question:

What is the minimum percentage increase that you would be willing to pay $100mm to increase your likelihood of passing stage 2? (i.e., it can’t be 100% and can’t be 40%)

---Message from WSO Below---

Free LBO Modeling Test (Email Form Below Video)

 
 
See if you're ready for the real deal. Video solution + modeling file included so you can get realistic practice. Just enter your email in the field below.
 

you probably have to times all the percentages together to find one percentage which represents the drug's overall chance of passing all the phases. then times that percentage by what it would be worth to find its actual value. subtract the upfront cost from that to get a net value. then just fool around with phase 2s pass percentage to see how it effects shit. keep increasing it until the NPV goes from negative to positive, where that happens shud b ur answer

GBS
 

Since the drug has already passed stage 1, there's a 9.6% chance it passes Stage 5 (.4.8.6*.5).

If it passes stage 5, the value of the project is $200M. If it doesn't pass stage 5, the value of the project is 0.

9.6% x 200M = 19.6M.

I don't know where to go from there... It doesn't look like a good project to me.

MM IB -> Corporate Development -> Strategic Finance
 

I might be way off, but the way I thought about it was this:

You stand to make $200M and have an upcront cost of $50M, leaving you with a potential profit of $150M

You are only concerned with the second stage for this problem. So I'd calculate the propbability of passing stages 3-5 as (.8.6.5=24%).

Stage 2 is worth (at max) 24% of your potential $150M profit or $36M.

 

Yea man, looks like a bogus question. To start, 50MM / 200M = 0.25 = 25% chance needed to get through the subsequent rounds for it to be a positive NPV project.

So then you need to see what the likelihood is of passing the last three rounds before you focus on round 2. (.8.6.5 = 0.24 = 24%) Even with a 100% likelihood of passing round 2 this is still a negative NPV project as 24%

 

Way I look at it is, getting past stage 2 means you still have stages 3, 4 and 5 left, which means you only have a 0.8 x 0.6 x0.5 = 0.24 chance of realizing $200 mil. Which means, after stage 2, you're left w/ a project that is worth $48 million.

Reword the problem like this...if you have a chance to pay $100 mil. to improve your odds of getting $48 million, how much % would you want to increase it? answer is, HELL NO I AIN'T PAYIN'!!!!

 

buddyfox has the right idea - use a decision tree and basically calculate the product of the probability of passing each stage in the future * payoff at end of 200 to be the expected value at each stage.

at stage 2: (40%80%60%50%) * 200 = 19.2 at stage 3: (80%60%*50%) * 200 = 48

The 50mm is an upfront cost and so is a sunk-cost and should be ignored in the calculations.

So the question can be recast as saying you are willing to pay

 

Et nemo voluptates quod expedita et. Dicta dolorem voluptas voluptas qui qui aliquam aut. Dolor rerum sed accusamus. In consequatur qui vero aliquid eius corrupti perspiciatis cum. Aut laboriosam fugiat ipsam et molestiae ipsam.

Quo sint enim dolor quos ratione. Eum quis reprehenderit necessitatibus sed. Dolore officia vero rerum aut quo laborum voluptates.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (205) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”