Province - Restructuring Reputation

I am wondering if anyone has heard of a restructuring shop called Province. It seems like they have been on a number of UCC mandates -- can anyone provide some color on the firm and how they are regarded in the space?  Their website for reference: provincefirm .com


 

Interviewed with them a few months ago and would advise you to avoid. One of the MDs literally said to get ready for 100hr weeks while getting cursed and was just an overall dick. Before anyone calls me a pussy, the 100hr weeks weren’t the problem, it was just the overall culture. Also, they have you take a pretty difficult 3 statement LBO modeling test.

 

Thanks, so you are of the opinion that they mainly do turnaround consulting type work? How does this differ from a more standard RX group? 

 
Most Helpful

Currently an employee at the Miami office. Overall I'd say I absolutely enjoyed my time here. I love working with my team, and I'd describe the culture as pretty laidback, until its time to grind (admittedly a regular occurance).

As a brief introduction to the company, Province provides financial advisory services to parties within the bankruptcy process, as well as company-side advisory prior to the process. Primarily, Province has focused on representing the Unsecured Creditors Committee (UCC), but have expanded to representing the company, lenders, and equity committees in recent years. 

Speaking to an earlier comment, the MD's can come off a little strong, but they mean well and do care about the team.  We've had a few past-employees who weren't able to handle the hours or responsibilities, so the first interview is intended to be fairly difficult.  It's a 3-statement LBO model to be completed in 3 hours. Hard, but absolutely doable if you know your stuff. 

The hours are long, especially given COVID's effect on the pace of bankruptcy filings, but for the most part its fullfiling work. Due to the boutique size, you get far more exposure to parts of deals that would normally be allocated to a more senior member at larger firms. Its industry agnostic, but certain offices due have a tendency to focus more on speicific sectors (For example, the Baltimore office tends to have a strong focus on healthcare). If you can stomach the hours (usually 60-80/week, 100+ is rare but not unheard of) and feel comfortable with being assigned tasks you've never personally done before, then I'd highly recommend it. The compensation is competitive, and advancement feels faster than other firms as long as you prove yourself capable.

 

Thanks for this - very interesting. Based on the website, "senior associates" seem to have between 3 and 14 years of experience, with some having joined from IB / PE gigs. 

Could you provide any insight into the compensation and give any context to job titles? Would be very interested to see how this compares to other opportunities. 

 

Of course. To answer your first question: The wide experience range seen in our Senior Associate pool is primarily due lack of significant restrucuturing experience. At the Vice-President and Director levels, there is an expectatation that at those levels you should be able to run point on the majority of a case (or even a whole case in smaller filings). To that point, new hires who would ordinarily qualfiy for that level of responsibility, but lack the industry specific experience, will often be brought on as Senior Associates with the expectation that as they demonstrate the competency to handle these responsibilities they will quickly rise to the appropriate rank. I've personally witnessed this happen in as little as a year. 

Job titles are structured slightly different than ordinary, most likely due to a relaxed structure at the firm's inception. The progression is Analyst -> Associate -> Sr. Associate -> VP -> Director -> Sr. Director -> Managing Director. I'd say Analysts are roughly equivalent to "Summer Analysts or Analyst 1's". Associate would be A1 - A3. Sr. Associate would be the equivalent of an Associate at a standard investment bank. From that point on I can't really say accurately how its applied. 

 

Saepe ut nihil explicabo facere et. Odit dicta veritatis facilis et a exercitationem dolores.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”