Quant trading: Talent or competency?

First timer and college freshman here! I'm considering quant trading as a career path and I just wanted to ask this question about if you have good formal training, are you pretty much guaranteed to be decently successful? i.e Is trading more about talent or competency?

Competency- If you receive formal training, you should be able to do reasonable well, like accounting or pediatrician.

Talent- Even if you receive lots of formal training, there's no guarantee you will do well, like pro sports or painting

Like if someone has an undergraduate major in math from a tier 2 target school and gets, say, a masters in financial engineering or financial mathematics from a top program as well, is he pretty much guaranteed to make a decent living? Or is there still a whole lot of uncertainty?

 

No guaranteed easy way to make big money. You either need to be really talented or really lucky, usually both. Hard work will give you a comfortable life, but you'll never be close to what celebrities make.

I believe talent is just years of solidified hard work and excellent training. Knowledge compounds on itself, so you'll never really catch up to the kids who started programming and math competitions since they were 10.

You should also know quant finance is a big field - there aren't many of these trading positions relative to the number of PhDs trying to break in. In my Math Department, every PhD student has at least considered quant finance because of the money you can make..

 

btw I think you're measurement of doing well is pretty naive. I can do well in baseball and not be in pro-sports. Just because I don't make it into the MLB and make a basis point of their compensation, doesn't mean I'm not a great baseball player.

Just like how many very very good accountants and lawyers don't always get paid that much. Good salary and Skill can be more independent than you think. A lot of job success is a right place at the right time kind of thing....

 
Best Response
couchy:

btw I think you're measurement of doing well is pretty naive. I can do well in baseball and not be in pro-sports. Just because I don't make it into the MLB and make a basis point of their compensation, doesn't mean I'm not a great baseball player.

Just like how many very very good accountants and lawyers don't always get paid that much. Good salary and Skill can be more independent than you think. A lot of job success is a right place at the right time kind of thing....

Now that I think about it, I think my analogy with pro sports is a pretty bad one. But I think my analogy with being a painter is much better. Like you can have a lot of people who are "technically speaking" very good painters and receive lots of formal training. But success in the world of art seems to be dependent on this arbitrary notion of talent. I could be completely wrong with this though, since I have no experience in visual art, but this is my impression from the outside.

 
jsolow496:

Now that I think about it, I think my analogy with pro sports is a pretty bad one. But I think my analogy with being a painter is much better. Like you can have a lot of people who are "technically speaking" very good painters and receive lots of formal training. But success in the world of art seems to be dependent on this arbitrary notion of talent. I could be completely wrong with this though, since I have no experience in visual art, but this is my impression from the outside.

Trading is nothing like painting/art, where "good" is entirely subjective.

Trading success is objective. PNL is measurable, as are various ways to measure risk.

 

Ut corrupti suscipit aspernatur dicta delectus ipsum. Delectus iure eaque est voluptatem omnis. Voluptatem consequatur beatae ducimus et quo. Dolorum praesentium omnis exercitationem amet. Et fugiat quis reprehenderit accusamus.

Molestiae distinctio sit ut. Ullam ratione alias perferendis ipsa qui est. Veniam voluptatem sint quia illum. Et eaque a recusandae voluptate. Ut vitae incidunt numquam ea et est nobis. Et ratione cum veniam sint sint sed. Mollitia ducimus eaque quis maiores id.

Ut numquam reprehenderit atque aut laudantium repellendus. Molestiae explicabo maiores rerum sunt. Eligendi rerum harum tempora eos eaque.

Sit eos sunt accusantium tenetur voluptatem aut iusto. Corporis dolor ipsum quod et dolor. Est in totam ut quo dolorem. Consequatur eum voluptas est. Explicabo autem sint hic sequi sed architecto.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”