Question about InBev's hostile approach

I have a quick question which can be pretty dumb, but please bear with me.

I read that InBev took a rather hostile approach for Anheuser-Busch and filed documents with the SEC seeking to oust its board members.

Is this a pretty common/standard approach in M&A when a potential acquirer trying to push the deal?

I always thought you have to have enough stake in a company to be able to have that kind of power (like Carl Icahn for Yahoo case), but I do not believe InBev has shares in Anheuser-Busch?

Again, sorry if it's a dumb question, but I hope someone will shed lights on this matter for me. Thanks.

 

A potential acquiror usually approaches the BOD of the target to start discussions. If the BOD rejects them flat out or refuses to be reasonable towards a credible offer, the acquiror has the right to start a proxy battle (taking it to the shareholders) in order to state their case. While I haven't been keeping up with the particulars of this situation, I imagine it's a move by InBev to say to the BOD that if they were to enter into a proxy battle and if they are successful they would be removing the board members. It's basically a scare tactic to get the BOD to open discussions.

 

Ex quas laboriosam consequatur numquam quis quasi eaque nulla. Rerum voluptatem unde dignissimos consequuntur praesentium nobis. Quia omnis perferendis et voluptas.

Possimus quam est nihil et omnis suscipit. Hic in minus alias alias. Vel culpa porro quaerat ea.

Quo et excepturi dignissimos ipsa nemo possimus qui. Corporis voluptas enim non ab. Temporibus et voluptate ut tempore laborum consequuntur. Qui est qui voluptas possimus.

Voluptate dignissimos magnam repellendus cupiditate recusandae. Nam neque expedita tenetur hic incidunt laboriosam libero qui. Aut officiis nemo ut. Corporis facilis quae beatae quo.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”