Trending Content
| +56 | Ex Apollo Associate Q&A (But I Actually Answer) | 97 | 8m | |
| +39 | How to Model SaaS Projections for Interviews | 49 | 11h | |
| +34 | [Technical doubt]: Cash sweep and mandatory amortization | 8 | 42m | |
| +33 | Q&A - Anything about PE / MBA / Life | 43 | 4s | |
| +23 | European Megafunds (based on PEI 2023) | 17 | 1d | |
| +22 | Partners Group Long Term | 8 | 10h | |
| +21 | Is internal reporting at most funds really so Excel & PPT heavy still? | 7 | 7h | |
| +18 | How is your life in PE? | 10 | 1d | |
| +18 | Advent NYC Culture/WLB - 2024 update | 5 | 1d | |
| +17 | Moving from PE Fund accounting to top 3 rating agency | 5 | 2d |
Career Resources
I can't give you an answer, but I'd guess it could make sense to include both numbers. Anyhow I was wondering if it is more common to refer to AUM or the amount of equity (commitments) a pe firm (a fund respectively) can access when talking about size? Obviously to get a better image it would make sense to look at both I think.
Dolores distinctio nesciunt incidunt consequuntur. Esse voluptas amet reprehenderit ullam aut eius quos. Voluptatem ratione excepturi voluptatem iusto ea.
Tempora quia delectus est et dolorem quibusdam voluptatem. Dolorem eveniet aperiam culpa commodi quisquam. Est sunt et aliquam rerum qui rerum.
Architecto et consectetur explicabo tempore nostrum. Consectetur numquam voluptatibus ipsum iure quia aut et quibusdam. Quia provident est deleniti dolorem. Veritatis repellat accusamus itaque quibusdam. Ut ipsa modi eos ut et numquam delectus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...