Ranking MM Firms?

How do you think about the top firms in the MM? There's a sort of top-tier everyone gives (Blair, Baird, HL, sometimes others) but how do you rank those 3, and what's the top 5-10?

Also, how do banks that are sort of MM but not really (RBC, Jefferies) fit on those lists? Ie how would you compare Blair vs RBC?

 

Tier 1: Jefferies / RBC / WFS Tier 1b: HSBC / Baird / William Blair / BMO / HL Tier 2: Jaffray / Harris Williams Tier 2b: RJ / Cowen / Truist (STRH) / Stifel / Nomura / BNP Tier 3: Oppenheimer / Lincoln International / Mizuho / MUFG / Credit Agricole / Lazard MM

Edit: Firms not ranked within tiers

 

Wouldnt add Nomura there, Nomura should be placed near RBC (still not sure in MM)

 
Ebitdoggo:
Tier 1: Jefferies / RBC / WFS Tier 1b: HSBC / Baird / William Blair / BMO / HL Tier 2: Jaffray / Harris Williams Tier 2b: RJ / Cowen / Truist (STRH) / Stifel / Nomura / BNP Tier 3: Oppenheimer / Lincoln International / Mizuho / MUFG / Credit Agricole / Lazard MM

Edit: Firms not ranked within tiers

lol @ Jefferies and WFS in same tier.

 

You all need to decide whether you are defining MM as banks that do deal sizes in the middle market range or otherwise. Including "full service-like" banks such as WFS, RBC, HSBC, Nomura, BNP, Mizuho, MUFG, Credit Agricole, Societe Generale, etc. just doesn't make sense. These banks would be included as BBs IMO.

Also important to differentiate between boutiques and MM. For example, banks like Waller Helms, GCA, Hammond, Mesirow, FT Partners, Intrepid, Livingstone, Greentech, Prairie Capital, Arbor, JMP, City Capital, etc. classify themselves as boutiques.

Also, should add Stephens and probably even FT Partners as MM banks (even though I just classified it as boutique).

 
Most Helpful

[Edit: this comment is almost 2 years old. Also, ranking threads are still absolutely fucking deplorable]

So first of all, I really hate these ranking threads, because most of the information people post is either outdated or flat-out wrong. But I wanted to present some raw data so people can interpret the results on their own. I ran a quick Bloomberg league table with these criterion:

Target Region: United States

Date Range: YTD

Transaction Type: M&A ONLY - I think this is valid because the majority of TRUE MM firms focus almost exclusively on M&A

Average Deal Value: < $1B (this is a somewhat arbitrary cutoff for what I will define as "MM")

Here are the top 10 banks ranked by *total deal value* (TDV: total deal value, ADV: average deal value, n: deal count):

*1. UBS: TDV = 16.5B, ADV = 749m, n = 22
2. Stifel: 15.9B, 305m, 52
3. Baird: 10.0B, 238m, 42
4. Sandler O'Neill: 8.2B, 265m, 31
5. Houlihan Lokey: 8.2B, 97m, 84
6. William Blair: 7.4B, 118m, 63
7. BMO: 6.8B, 338m, 20
8. Raymond James: 4.4B, 77m, 57
9. Cowen: 4.3B, 619m, 7
10. Valence Group: 4.0B, 669m, 6

Now, obviously UBS is not a MM; if we remove it, the next up would be Canaccord Genuity: TDV = 3.2B, ADV = 154m, n = 21.

Irrespective of order, I think the majority of the firms on this list fit the profile of a “strong MM” in the US. However, you still have a couple wildcards, namely, Valence Group and Canaccord Genuity.

To address this, I tried ranking by *Deal Count*, as opposed to Total Deal Value:

1. Houlihan Lokey: TDV = 8.2B, ADV = 97m, n = 84
2. William Blair: 7.4B, 118m, 63
3. Raymond James: 4.4B, 77m, 57
4. Stifel: 15.9B, 305m, 52
5. Baird: 10.0B, 238m, 42
6. Lincoln International: 780m, 20m, 39
7. Piper Jaffray: 2.2B, 61m, 37
8. Sandler O'Neill, 8.2B, 265m, 31
9. PNC: 2.1B, 88m, 24

*10. UBS: 16.5B, 749m, 22

Once again, UBS is obviously not a MM. Also, Piper Jaffray and Sandler O'Neill are merging, so they are technically double-counted. Accordingly, the next two up on the list would be:
11. Canaccord Genuity: TDV = 3.2B, ADV = 154m, n = 21
12. KeyBanc Capital Markets: 2.2B, 104m, 21

Here are some of my key takeaways from this:

a) UBS needs to pick up the slack

b) Baird is on an absolute TEAR this year

c) Lincoln has solid deal flow, but I was greatly surprised by how small their deals are.

d) Canaccord Genuity and KeyBanc are doing better than I would have guessed.

e) The "in-between" banks (Wells Fargo, RBC, Jefferies) really are an anomaly, considering they don't appear on either of these lists.

For some added depth, here are their stats:

Wells Fargo: TDV = 60.4B, ADV = 2.1B, n = 29

*RBC: 155.5B, 4.7B, 33

Jefferies: 123.0B, 1.9B, 69

RBC's data is HEAVILY skewed by the fact that they are doing the fairness opinion on Raytheon + United Technologies, a 90B deal. If you adjust for that, RBC's stats are: TDV = 65.5B, ADV = 2.0B

As an aside, I would be greatly interested in seeing how these banks stack up when you control for the size of their workforces. Something like ADV / # of MDs would be very interesting. Some of these firms run much leaner than others, making it that much more impressive for them to crack the top 10. Additionally, there are other banks that may not have made it in the top 10, but are doing extremely well given their team sizes.

Anyway, I hope this helps shed some light on the ACTUAL data, rather than simply speculating based on word-of-mouth from reading other WSO posts.

 
  • Tier 1: Jefferies, Blair, Baird, Piper, HL,
  • Tier 2: HW, Lincoln, BMO
  • Tier 3: Cowen, Stifel, Raymond James, Stephens

Regardless "ranking" is irrelevant its very group dependent at these shops

 
WOMENIBERRR:
* Tier 1: Jefferies, Blair, Baird, Piper, HL, * Tier 2: HW, Lincoln, BMO * Tier 3: Cowen, Stifel, Raymond James, Stephens

Regardless "ranking" is irrelevant its very group dependent at these shops

Well put on the depends on the group statement.

If we had to rank them across industries, I might not even have three tiers because it is so industry dependent:

  • Tier 1: Jefferies, Blair, Baird, HL, Piper, HW
  • Tier 2: Cowen, Stifel, Raymond James, Stephens, Lincoln, BMO, Black Arch, Lazard MM
 

According to merger market, advisors sorted by 2019 sub $1b, global deal count (M&A only):

  1. Rothschild - 145 deals. disclosed value of $25.4b
  2. Houlihan - 122 deals. disclosed value of $13.3b
  3. Lincoln - 115 deals. disclosed value of $1.8b
  4. Goldman - 114 deals. disclosed value of $34.9b
  5. Lazard - 110 deals. disclosed value of $24.3b
  6. JPM - 93 deals. disclosed value of $27.4b
  7. Jefferies - 92 deals. disclosed value of $18.1b
  8. Evercore - 85 deals. disclosed value of $17.0b
  9. RayJ - 85 deals. disclosed value of $5.3b
  10. Morgan Stanley - 83 deals. disclosed value of $27.0b
  11. Barclays - 80 deals. disclosed value of $19.2b
  12. William Blair - 78 deals. disclosed value of $6.9b
  13. Citi - 77 deals. disclosed value of $23.7b
  14. Piper - 73 deals. disclosed value of $3.8b
  15. Oaklins - 73 deals. disclosed value of $1.2b
  16. Baird - 63 deals. disclosed value of $4.5b

The problem with the middle market is lack of disclosed values, so take implied average deal value with a large grain of salt.

 
bankblankbank:
According to merger market, advisors sorted by 2019 sub $1b, global deal count (M&A only):
  1. Rothschild - 145 deals. disclosed value of $25.4b
  2. Houlihan - 122 deals. disclosed value of $13.3b
  3. Lincoln - 115 deals. disclosed value of $1.8b
  4. Goldman - 114 deals. disclosed value of $34.9b
  5. Lazard - 110 deals. disclosed value of $24.3b
  6. JPM - 93 deals. disclosed value of $27.4b
  7. Jefferies - 92 deals. disclosed value of $18.1b
  8. Evercore - 85 deals. disclosed value of $17.0b
  9. RayJ - 85 deals. disclosed value of $5.3b
  10. Morgan Stanley - 83 deals. disclosed value of $27.0b
  11. Barclays - 80 deals. disclosed value of $19.2b
  12. William Blair - 78 deals. disclosed value of $6.9b
  13. Citi - 77 deals. disclosed value of $23.7b
  14. Piper - 73 deals. disclosed value of $3.8b
  15. Oaklins - 73 deals. disclosed value of $1.2b
  16. Baird - 63 deals. disclosed value of $4.5b

The problem with the middle market is lack of disclosed values, so take implied average deal value with a large grain of salt.

LOL, look guys Oaklins is a better bank than Baird!

/saracasm

 

Nostrum maxime voluptas fugiat aut. Veritatis quia assumenda dolores distinctio rem debitis quia.

Dolor minus quis sed reprehenderit. Aliquam animi dolor fugiat eos illum molestiae saepe quis. Quis in assumenda aut sint optio.

Adipisci voluptatem officia eius harum explicabo ea dolorem. Mollitia non sit fuga ipsa sed sint. Optio numquam possimus ea alias maiores sit consequuntur. Praesentium numquam et et. Omnis ea vel dolor aut natus voluptas.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”