RE Debt: Brokered vs Direct

For those of you that work on the debt side (debt funds, commercial banking, credit HFs), what percentage of your flow comes direct from sponsor vs are brokered processes? At mine it’s about 80% brokered (from JLL/CB/eastdil) and 20% direct to sponsor. Curious what the ratio is for others.

 
Most Helpful

We are closer to 50/50, but in my experience it generally has more to do with sponsor size that anything else.

Most of our brokered deals are from small to medium sized borrowers that need/want help running a process where the large institutional shops have dedicated financing staff in house and go direct.

Also, some borrowers start brokered but end up direct on repeat deals. We had a borrower that we did 10 deals in 2 years. The first was brokered and they liked us so much they came direct for the rest. If you can avoid paying a broker 35bps and instead call a lender, dupe some docs and close in 25 days, that is generally the easier route.

 

I’ll add about duping docs. It was eye opening for me to see how much business was won (and lost) over duplicating documents. Many lenders out there will do what they need to (drop rate, change structure, etc.) in order to win a deal and get a first set of documents negotiated with a high volume acquisition borrower. They understand that having those docs in place make them so much more competitive to win the next loan that comes around because all of a sudden, it’s cheaper and easier to close the deal. 

 

Not having to renegotiate every little point is huge, especially with the larger institutions. Quicker, less legal and they aren't as worried about getting x, y, or z because they already have it. Also why you have to be careful on the lending side what you give away, because it can bite you in the ass on the next deal.

 
mrcheese321

We are closer to 50/50, but in my experience it generally has more to do with sponsor size that anything else.

Most of our brokered deals are from small to medium sized borrowers that need/want help running a process where the large institutional shops have dedicated financing staff in house and go direct.

I’ve found this to be the case, but for the truly large loans (say $200mm+), more often than not they’re brokered. I’ve seen BX and their ilk who have a fairly built out capital markets team still engage eastdil / HFF / etc

 

When I was at a Life Co and did lending probably 90% of our deal flow, maybe even a bit more, was brokered. But many of the larger firms would come to us direct. At a certain scale, as also noted above, firms begin to bring debt capital markets in house. The smaller and midsize players would usually use a broker and the larger shops had one person (or even a team) dedicated just to DCM work. 

 

This is simple but has always made a noticeable difference to my team - take the 15-20 minutes to ask about the firm and their teams experience as well as really telling the group about yourself and your firm. It’s amazing how so many people will just want to jump right into the “deal” and not even want to get to know the person they are talking to. My team would take a term sheet a few bps stiffer than another if it meant getting to deal with someone that actually gives a damn.

 

Quidem libero deleniti velit placeat nostrum voluptates illo. Architecto aut sed modi nihil maiores. Facere sint officiis eius non consectetur natus. Ducimus eos enim laudantium soluta eum vero rerum. Earum omnis error sed quidem voluptatem.

Minus sit eos quasi officiis et. Voluptatem officiis quas minus nobis quam vel aliquam suscipit.

Quia iste explicabo voluptatem praesentium in tenetur. Itaque qui debitis voluptate officiis velit eos rem. Voluptatem quos earum nihil hic repellat reprehenderit velit beatae. Facilis vel reprehenderit qui cum fugiat voluptatem facilis est. Sunt quo consectetur animi. Ex nemo dolore rerum ipsum perferendis optio.

Facere earum quo ab velit. Officiis iure quis quia doloremque numquam et. Aliquam in neque iusto voluptatem maxime quod voluptatem tempore. Libero suscipit et voluptatum ad id nihil.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”