Reviving the Certified Users Group

Hey guys, per the discussions in the WSO Suggestions thread, it looked like a decent number of you share my interest in getting a lot more dialogue out there between the Certified Users. I assume most of the people given CU status are legitimate, but I'm sure there's some that aren't, but regardless it might not be a bad idea to try something like a Certified Users Happy Hour separate from the all-WSO ones, because I think if that was the case I'd be much more open to coming out a bit more and not being as anonymous (my anonymity pales in comparison to some others though).

I have no interest in showing up to a bar covered in Baruch students passing out resumes for a WSO Happy Hour, but I'd be more than willing to show up and have a few beers with some guys in the industry who I could bullshit with about things that a group of college kids would never be able to relate to or understand. If this idea sounds interesting to anyone, speak up and maybe we can get something set up.

Also, just for the purpose of general conversation among the guys in the industry... is anyone else noticing (across all of them, not just the WSO people, though most notably the WSO kids) the new generation coming in trying to "break in" have a very marked attitude shift... at least from what I remember of how everything worked back when I was in their shoes? People seem a lot more entitled and lazy, very passive, clueless and without the motivation or determination to go out and get a clue themselves, etc? Am I sounding snobby or are a good number of these kids just seem lost and more or less disappointing to talk to and help?... If that makes any sense?

 
BlackHat:
Hey guys, per the discussions in the WSO Suggestions thread, it looked like a decent number of you share my interest in getting a lot more dialogue out there between the Certified Users. I assume most of the people given CU status are legitimate, but I'm sure there's some that aren't, but regardless it might not be a bad idea to try something like a Certified Users Happy Hour separate from the all-WSO ones, because I think if that was the case I'd be much more open to coming out a bit more and not being as anonymous (my anonymity pales in comparison to some others though).

I have no interest in showing up to a bar covered in Baruch students passing out resumes for a WSO Happy Hour, but I'd be more than willing to show up and have a few beers with some guys in the industry who I could bullshit with about things that a group of college kids would never be able to relate to or understand. If this idea sounds interesting to anyone, speak up and maybe we can get something set up.

Also, just for the purpose of general conversation among the guys in the industry... is anyone else noticing (across all of them, not just the WSO people, though most notably the WSO kids) the new generation coming in trying to "break in" have a very marked attitude shift... at least from what I remember of how everything worked back when I was in their shoes? People seem a lot more entitled and lazy, very passive, clueless and without the motivation or determination to go out and get a clue themselves, etc? Am I sounding snobby or are a good number of these kids just seem lost and more or less disappointing to talk to and help?... If that makes any sense?

I think it's just that the louder kids are the more annoying / entitled ones and there are now more of them on WSO.

Would definitely be up for grabbing a beer with any Certified Users in Boston. As for NYC, the Happy hours are usually a good group of guys (many of them are professionals/certified)...the only happy hour i heard of someone bringing a resume was the one the night before the WSO Conference. ha, so clueless...

Woud like to see this group pick up. I know Gekko21 was talking about a Fantasy Football league...maybe we could get some more certified users to jump in...

anyone game?

 
BlackHat:
Soooooo down for fantasy football.

cool, I asked Gekko21 to post details in here once he sets it up.

Fucking nightmare on WSO the last 48hrs...not sure if you noticed, but I had to remove 99% of mods and create a new user role for all bloggers (they used to be mods so they could promote to home page) + shut down chat, etc..

some bad shit was going down - like one of our mods threatening bankerella, etc, so now we removed basically all mods (excpet a few very clsoe trusted ones) and will be relying on the userbase to flag violations...should work, but we'll see.

 
WallStreetOasis.com:
BlackHat:
Soooooo down for fantasy football.

cool, I asked Gekko21 to post details in here once he sets it up.

Fucking nightmare on WSO the last 48hrs...not sure if you noticed, but I had to remove 99% of mods and create a new user role for all bloggers (they used to be mods so they could promote to home page) + shut down chat, etc..

some bad shit was going down - like one of our mods threatening bankerella, etc, so now we removed basically all mods (excpet a few very clsoe trusted ones) and will be relying on the userbase to flag violations...should work, but we'll see.

Oh... that's what that was all about, haha. Think I have a good idea what happened now, gotcha. It might be dangerous to give mods that ability to see e-mail addresses, unless mods becomes something a lot more strictly handed out. I still can't wrap my head around why Bankerella is all the sudden taking on Tebow-like popularity and polarization in the commentariat. She's just another one of the good posters... it's obvious when she's exaggerating or being satirical, but I guess you can't rely on the masses to figure that out, especially when they're not understanding what she's saying in the first place.

Not surprised chat had to go, though I do hope it's temporary, as I've gotten to know a lot of the posters much better via chat and I think that really helps add something to the forum. You also get a better idea of what people's real backgrounds are in when talking to them in real-time and a feel for their personalities which is another big plus. PM is fine but obviously not as quick and scale-able as chat. That said, the troll / ridiculous shit that goes on in there at times is definitely not what the intention of having a chat function was. Good example is what happened to Heister.

I hate victims who respect their executioners
 
  • Certified User group seems like a good concept (sadly, as a Canadian consultant not really relevent) but I support anything for good guys getting together to have a beer.

  • Re: New Generation - I haven't noticed it in any of my projects, but I've heard a couple times now from senior's "why aren't our other associates like you." Generally their approach to QA and deadlines.

  • I can't imagine having to moderate a site with this much faux-testosterone flowing through it. I get probably a kid a month tracking me down on LinkedIN (I'm not tough to find really) looking for me to get them a job....and they get bitchy if I say I really can't do anything for them.

Maybe someone a few years older than me can let me know if every generation is this way.

TT

 

Can we have some separate designation for mods. Like instead of a gold star it could be a blue star or something along those lines.

Regarding what you wrote BlackHat I think it's just a result of the coddled nature of this generation and that they been brainwashed that a college degree is a magic ticket to riches. Maybe back 15-20 years ago but not in a post financial crisis world. They'll get it eventually like we all have once 6 months after graduation rolls by and they have to make their first $500 monthly payment on $80k of unsubsidized student loans.

Regardless most students (and some of my peers) fail to realize that at this stage in the game all they have is potential. We aren't judged by our potential though, as many fail to reach theirs. Right now they are just another monkey with dollar signs in their eyes, hoping the best case scenario works out for them. They talk big but in the end its all hopes and dreams.

 
bearing:
Can we have some separate designation for mods. Like instead of a gold star it could be a blue star or something along those lines.

Regarding what you wrote BlackHat I think it's just a result of the coddled nature of this generation and that they been brainwashed that a college degree is a magic ticket to riches. Maybe back 15-20 years ago but not in a post financial crisis world. They'll get it eventually like we all have once 6 months after graduation rolls by and they have to make their first $500 monthly payment on $80k of unsubsidized student loans.

Regardless most students (and some of my peers) fail to realize that at this stage in the game all they have is potential. We aren't judged by our potential though, as many fail to reach theirs. Right now they are just another monkey with dollar signs in their eyes, hoping the best case scenario works out for them. They talk big but in the end its all hopes and dreams.

yeah, well honestly I don't think we even need mods to have any actual power anymore since anyone can flag a post and we can have a much smaller subset of internal admins actually review the flagged post table. I'd say right now there are only ~10-20 violations on avg per day...this peaks during a controversial post, but overall, we really just need to make sure everyone knows how to flag posts. I will likely be making an announcement soon encouraging users to review our User Guidelines and to flag any violations. I think that will really help keep things clean./ER...

would love to bring back chat, but it's such an epic liability unless we have someone watching it 24/7...most users haven't shown the maturity to handle it and forget that it's public just like the forums...

anyway, I think we're moving in the right direction, it was just a tough 48hrs...plus the Site Suggestions forums are always slightly depressing for me. After 6 years of tweaks you'd think we could make more people happy.

ha - nope, people still saying search sucks and the content sucks...we need to step it up internally. I'm in the midst of relaunching jdOasis.com with a new team, so that is exciting, but also exhausting.

 
WallStreetOasis.com:
anyway, I think we're moving in the right direction, it was just a tough 48hrs...plus the Site Suggestions forums are always slightly depressing for me. After 6 years of tweaks you'd think we could make more people happy.

ha - nope, people still saying search sucks and the content sucks...we need to step it up internally. I'm in the midst of relaunching jdOasis.com with a new team, so that is exciting, but also exhausting.

Not to sound like a douchey, overly-positive guy, but I think the fact that people are giving feedback means they actually care about the site. I thought the feedback was overwhelmingly constructive. I just joined this a few months ago and I find it really addictive (too much so, if anything), which I think is a pretty high compliment. I used to gather a lot of feedback in my old firm for how things were run in the company and the contrast between how constructive and generally positive the comments here are stands in stark contrast to the negativity I used to find in those meetings at my old firm.

You're never going to make everyone happy, plus it's really easy to be a dick on the internet. Keep up the good work.

 
WallStreetOasis.com:
After 6 years of tweaks you'd think we could make more people happy.

ha - nope, people still saying search sucks

just saw this thread...i might have been guilty of this, hah...but i'd argue that giving some honest criticism in this context shows that you like WSO enough to try to make it better...i think the real culprits here are those who benefit from what the site offers and still don't expend any energy to offer some suggestions!...nothing is ever going to be perfect, and when it starts approaching that then expectations just shift based on realizing what is possible and doable...

fwiw- when i was a clueless senior in college i was deciding between offers from one of the big banks that ultimately went belly up and other firms that made it out ok, and if it wasn't for comments on WSO, i would have almost certainly took the job at bear/lehman/Merrill and my job situation would likely be significantly worse right now

even if they don't admit it, everyone knows the site is great otherwise there wouldn't be so many users...excellent content overall with a little entertainment...i want first dibs when it goes public

 
BlackHat:
just for the purpose of general conversation among the guys in the industry... is anyone else noticing (across all of them, not just the WSO people, though most notably the WSO kids) the new generation coming in trying to "break in" have a very marked attitude shift... at least from what I remember of how everything worked back when I was in their shoes? People seem a lot more entitled and lazy, very passive, clueless and without the motivation or determination to go out and get a clue themselves, etc? Am I sounding snobby or are a good number of these kids just seem lost and more or less disappointing to talk to and help?... If that makes any sense?
Regarding the annoying college kids: As Jimmy Conway said to Billy Batts in Goodfellas, "You insulted them a little bit."

I actually think, on average, the college kids now are much better prepared and informed, (by orders of magnitude) than the kids graduating with me in 1998. It probably has alot to do with the fact that the Internet is actually useful, informative, and can be browsed 1,000 times faster than the mid-'90's. I think Patrick is right that almost by definition, the most annoying/entitled/clueless ones are the loudest and usually you remember being annoyed more than something innocuous. Also, you would find them here on the internet more than in real life, probably because it's easier to ask dumb questions when someone can't tell you what a dumbass you are and can't prevent you from getting a job.

I like my anonymity and haven't figured out what my downside is yet about meeting people here in real life (and I don't like not knowing my downside). Because I have a couple of kids at home, I mostly only go out after work if it's with clients. Plus, I don't like to drink before work, if I can help it. So, I'm probably taking a pass on drinks for now.

Also, Patrick. I think I figured out what you are referring to about the threats towards Bankerella. Good move in banning that guy. That is pretty messed up and I hope it didn't go farther than the dumb stuff I saw posted in his thread.

 

Would definitely be down to try and grab beers with some of the Certified Users. I've been noticing this type of thing with kids trying to break in too. I mostly cluelessness / laziness, and a lot of them really don't seem to be cut out for it, or at least not the way they are going about it. When I was reaching out a couple years ago, I was prepped and ready for a full on interview any time I sent out an email or called someone on the phone. I have kids call me all the time now and say how certain they are that they want to do investment banking and I ask them to describe for me what an investment banking analyst does and they have no clue... and these are kids who use WSO... it just doesn't make sense to me. I think it's just a herd mentality, everyone gets excited about it but when push really comes to shove, you know the kids who really want to make it because they are prepared, they are hungry, and they will find a way to do it whether you help them or not, but they are humble and thankful for any advice they pick up along the way. I don't think you're in alone in thinking that these types of kids are the minority of cases, it's just that the other extreme has so saturated the job market that it's becoming much harder to see these types outside of the structured process. I have hope tho... I know I was like this and I have to believe that if you look hard enough you will find those diamonds in the rough who are worth helping out.

 
rufiolove:
Would definitely be down to try and grab beers with some of the Certified Users. I've been noticing this type of thing with kids trying to break in too. I mostly cluelessness / laziness, and a lot of them really don't seem to be cut out for it, or at least not the way they are going about it. When I was reaching out a couple years ago, I was prepped and ready for a full on interview any time I sent out an email or called someone on the phone. I have kids call me all the time now and say how certain they are that they want to do investment banking and I ask them to describe for me what an investment banking analyst does and they have no clue... and these are kids who use WSO... it just doesn't make sense to me. I think it's just a herd mentality, everyone gets excited about it but when push really comes to shove, you know the kids who really want to make it because they are prepared, they are hungry, and they will find a way to do it whether you help them or not, but they are humble and thankful for any advice they pick up along the way. I don't think you're in alone in thinking that these types of kids are the minority of cases, it's just that the other extreme has so saturated the job market that it's becoming much harder to see these types outside of the structured process. I have hope tho... I know I was like this and I have to believe that if you look hard enough you will find those diamonds in the rough who are worth helping out.

so true...and unfortunately some of the more active "trollish" users on WSO represent the group that has no clue. Some more bans are coming for users that have been getting repeated violations...I think after 10 violations I will give them a final warning and then pull the trigger. I'd like to make WSO a bit more welcoming / interesting to professionals and when we have 3-4 of the same users acting like they are 15 in almost every thread, it kind of hurts the image of the community, even if there are a lot of professionals / smart students lurking.

There are definitely some great guys out there though...just need to search. Met a few smart/nice people at the latest Boston WSO Happy Hr.

 

@ Patrick, After going through the WSO starting to get worse post, there were some legitimate points in there, which you have addressed, but I felt that a good number of users think that WSO should be perfectly tailored to their specific desires, which, for a large public forum is simply impossible. I've been reading/commenting on the forums since 2007 or whenever the hell back, and I think you have made incredible improvements, the site is miles ahead of what it used to be. Sure you can always improve it, and from what I am seeing, you and your team are working to do so, but don't feel like you have to cater to every little personal need of every user who bitches. There is still no other finance forum that serves the same purpose as WSO that even comes close to accomplishing what WSO does.

@Blackhat, I've been to several happy hours when I lived in the city. They mostly draw the Certified Users and other professionals. The few college kids that I have met in those meetups were also pretty on point, just a couple folks that were a bit off, but I think you get those in any get together. Anyway, I would love to come to an official CU meetup, but unfortunately I'm in France for now. Maybe when I do my Wharton exchange semester, I'll come up for one.

 
Best Response

Another point that just came to my head.

The Bankerella dynamic is getting a bit rediculous. I was one of the first people to read her post yesterday (the one about all nighters) when it went up on the homepage, before any comments were there. I thought to myself that this was a pretty good post with a unique view on how to handle all nighters and should technically be well received.

But I also knew that this would not be the case, simply becaue it is Bankerella and there would be so much hate in the comments section, a new user with no prior history of this dynamic would wonder why the hell are so many people hating SO HARD. Long and behold, this is exactly what happened, the usual haters came out en masse and talked their usual shit. I thought that, what if, we put up the same post and just switched the authors, say have it be by Vontropnats or someone, the comment section would look completely different.

 

Happy to be a new recruit to the League of the Gold Star. As one of the "younger generation", just thought I'd chime in on a few points--

The "new wave" of college students (and high school students) view the Internet as their lifeline. People are used to this idea of having a question and getting an instant answer. Texting, GChat, Facebook, etc... it just means that they expect someone to always be present and near-instant gratification. I've been bitched out more than once by underclassmen because I didn't respond right away to their LinkedIn requests, emails, etc.; I mean, give me a break fuckers, it's only been 3 days. Naturally, of course, that means these same people treat the Internet as a talking dictionary. I have siblings who are currently in middle/high school; they have never once cracked open an encyclopaedia in their life. Instead of digging around in any of the resources available to them, they immediately come to me or elder peers with questions. One of them was bold enough to ask me to give her a science fair project topic instead of researching and coming up with her own, which prompted an hour-long lecture and copious tears.

Long story short - it's not just a matter of an older generation griping on younger generations; it's an actual syndrome and a problem. I catch myself doing it from time to time and make an attempt to stop it, but when you've grown up in the Era of Instant Information/Responses, I can see why people can get impatient. "Why search around in the trenches when I could go straight to the source and ask a question, regardless if it sounds stupid or not?" (Add in the coddled idea of "There are no stupid questions" and you have a recipe for disaster...) THEN we get to the idea that the anonymity of the Internet has allowed people to act however the hell they please. After all, when you meet these overeager college kids in person, none of them are inquiring about suit colours or how to cold-call.

Patrick: sorry to hear about the clusterfuck; I have a pretty good idea of what happened (caught the posts before they were deleted). Hopefully the new system improves moderation a bit. I ran a large Internet community back in the day and there really is no way of pleasing everyone-- everyone just has their own opinion of what "should work best." For what it's worth, even in my 1-year stint on the site I've seen lots of improvements, and it's great you're opening it up to suggestions from the userbase.

I do have some secondary feedback from friends at my college, however. Here, WSO is almost something of an embarrassment, actually. I've seen students hiding their screens while getting on the forums, and no one really outright admits they lurk/post here. The general consensus is that WSO is for "desperate" and "toolish" individuals who are trying too hard to break in (i.e. too much useless focus on recruiting/interviews). Obviously that stereotype is coloured by the personality of a target school, but I think it does speak to the lack (or nonexistent prominence) of content that caters towards individuals already in the industry. I always enjoy the topics that focus on recent events or investing. Occasionally the content that gets promoted to the front page leans a little too much towards "lifestyle" and not enough towards the industry itself (this might also be a by-product of bloggers-as-mods having the ability to promote topics of their choosing). Of course, threads that focus on intellectual discussion should always deserve a place on the front page.

I agree with bearing's point about having a separate designation for mods. Especially if something gets -really- out of hand, would be nice to know who to contact. As for Bankerella - she's hilarious. And as much as I disagree with a few of her posts, they're great fuel for discussion. Just need to make sure the super-ragey comments are deleted so things don't get out of hand, but otherwise I see no reason to kick her.

Currently: future neurologist, current psychotherapist Previously: investor relations (top consulting firm), M&A consulting (Big 4), M&A banking (MM)
 
chicandtoughness:

I do have some secondary feedback from friends at my college, however. Here, WSO is almost something of an embarrassment, actually. I've seen students hiding their screens while getting on the forums, and no one really outright admits they lurk/post here. The general consensus is that WSO is for "desperate" and "toolish" individuals who are trying too hard to break in (i.e. too much useless focus on recruiting/interviews). Obviously that stereotype is coloured by the personality of a target school, but I think it does speak to the lack (or nonexistent prominence) of content that caters towards individuals already in the industry.

haha sounds like they treat it like porn, eveyone looks at it, but don't want to admit it. Well, they are at a loss then.

 
trailmix8:
haha sounds like they treat it like porn, eveyone looks at it, but don't want to admit it. Well, they are at a loss then.
That is an embarrassingly accurate way of putting it. Truly a pity - I don't believe we have WSO reps at my alma mater either.
Currently: future neurologist, current psychotherapist Previously: investor relations (top consulting firm), M&A consulting (Big 4), M&A banking (MM)
 

I haven't been around as much this summer as I had been before. Combination of work picking up and managing an overwhelming number of SA's this summer. I won't bother commenting on the mods/bankerella stuff because I didn't see it (I actually think bankerella is a pretty successful troll - entertaining/funny while at the same time eliciting crazy reactions).

I have already made my opinions about chat public (I miss it). I thought it was a great way to get to know posters on a more personal level and it's disappointing that a few (or maybe lots?) of bad apples ruined it.

I have kinda been on both sides of the equation at WSO. I was in a back office role for almost a year and a half before breaking in with a boutique bank. I started out as absolutely clueless, and this site along with M&I basically educated me. Maybe it's just because that experience is still relatively fresh in my memory that I don't think all that much has changed. Yes, traffic is higher, but the questions from newbs are still a healthy mix of batshit stupid and genuinely important. I know I personally have posted both types.

I think the conference was kind of a microcosm of the site audience. You had a ton of college kids there - some who had a clue and some who absolutely didn't. On top of that you had the people that kinda make the site run (primarily doing panels/helping to organize, but also in the general audience, as I was). I don't think this dynamic or ratio has changed all that much since I joined the site, the quantity of people from both walks is simply growing. I think the changes that have been made are mostly for the better, and I appreciate that Patrick is constantly seeking out constructive criticism.

I have had drinks with WSO members a few times (arranged through chat, I might add) and actually made some pretty good friends. The only formal HH I went to was after the conference, but I'm happy to do any sort of meetup. I'll slam some Guinness with just about anyone, but it would nice to get a crowd of industry guys (and maybe ladies?) together. With that said, I think it's important not to put up a barrier between the older and younger crowds. I've met some great people who are still in undergrad through the site and conference.

"For I am a sinner in the hands of an angry God. Bloody Mary full of vodka, blessed are you among cocktails. Pray for me now and at the hour of my death, which I hope is soon. Amen."
 

Honestly, the biggest benefit for me has been the people on WSO not necessarily the information so I'm all for this.

If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
 

Glad to see this group is back - to echo BH, I think a happy hour for CU is a great idea - just post the information in this forum so all the nutjobs don't see it.

Patrick, you continue to impress me with the site and how you handle the asshats (if it were me I wouldn't be as lenient, but I understand why you are).

+1 to Fantasy Football...

"Jesus, he's like a gremlin; comes with instructions and shit"
 

Blackhat, whenever you want to grab a beer, I can usually be convinced of it. I'm not gonna lie, I know what you were saying about the whole Happy Hour thing, but having been to just about all of the NYC ones, the core group of attendants are either all professionals/Certified Users and a certain alcoholic with a flair for taking mildly amusing notes and tearing into three piece suit wearing limey bastards. Come out to the next Happy Hour and experience it. Worst case, if you don't like it, say you're a lurker unless you end up meeting me. This way I can jokingly comment about overcoming my

. Nah, I kid man. In all seriousness, I'd come out and try it before you deny it. That said, I'm down for a CU meet up if that's what guys want to do instead of it. I'm sure we can find a time and a place that works to do this all.

I'm not going to comment on the "New Generation" stuff - just because I think that there is some truth in what everyone's said. I know I'm vocal about doing due diligence and searching for things whenever I see a stupid post that can be resolved with searching. At the same time, I do agree with ChicandToughness - it's kind of frighting how this younger generation swings; you know it's more than just a new sensation. These kids are tech savvy, which has its perks, but can't do anything on their own right without the aide of Wikipedia and other quick fixes. There is a high degree of "Instant Gratification" coming out of this generation, and it doesn't translate well in the workforce. Conversely, when their parents coddled them, they grew up believing they were entitled to it. Personally, I think that some good old fashioned ass kicking is in order, but that's just me.

Oh, and on Bankerella, I think she might be the new Midas - just without the beer swilling, machismo laiden, "FUCK YOU ALL AND THE HORSES YOU RODE IN ON" attitude. I'm sorry that some of the posters here are assholes, particularly with what happened, but jeez - she causes some controversy and it can be a good thing. She's just not as bad as Midas... yet!

 

Working on the fantasy football thing now. We might have to make 2 separate leagues as there is one that is close to being full as it is. Will post more information when I have it.

If you are interested in playing and havent said so, please comment here.

If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
 
happypantsmcgee:
Working on the fantasy football thing now. We might have to make 2 separate leagues as there is one that is close to being full as it is. Will post more information when I have it.

If you are interested in playing and havent said so, please comment here.

HPM, took a look at the settings...seems like a lot of bonus points for QBs...it's been years since I've played Fantasy, so would you say the currents settings of the league make it wise to take a QB in the first round?

do the auto-draft default rankings / settings take the settings of the league into account when projecting the marginal win-share/value of each player?

In other words, is the default ranking from an autodraft assuming a different set of point settings (ie maybe not as many for QBs, like the 400+ passing yrds per game, etc)? If so, which ones did you add in that are not taken into account?

Thanks

 
WallStreetOasis.com:
happypantsmcgee:
Working on the fantasy football thing now. We might have to make 2 separate leagues as there is one that is close to being full as it is. Will post more information when I have it.

If you are interested in playing and havent said so, please comment here.

HPM, took a look at the settings...seems like a lot of bonus points for QBs...it's been years since I've played Fantasy, so would you say the currents settings of the league make it wise to take a QB in the first round?

do the auto-draft default rankings / settings take the settings of the league into account when projecting the marginal win-share/value of each player?

In other words, is the default ranking from an autodraft assuming a different set of point settings (ie maybe not as many for QBs, like the 400+ passing yrds per game, etc)? If so, which ones did you add in that are not taken into account?

Thanks

The auto draft logic is completely customizable on your end. However, it does not take into account the leagues individual rules. I would say that, yes, taking a QB earlier is probably smart. You can place positions by priority to reflect that as well.
If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
 

Patrick,

Feasability of a chat focused/exclusive to CU group? Should prevent the BS from before and give us a chance to 'connect' a bit more effectively.

If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
 
happypantsmcgee:
Patrick,

Feasability of a chat focused/exclusive to CU group? Should prevent the BS from before and give us a chance to 'connect' a bit more effectively.

ooo, good idea man! let me see if I can paste it into our Group description and make it live...

hopefully the certifieds are mature enough AND this would be an awesome incentive to get certified.

 
WallStreetOasis.com:
happypantsmcgee:
Patrick,

Feasability of a chat focused/exclusive to CU group? Should prevent the BS from before and give us a chance to 'connect' a bit more effectively.

ooo, good idea man! let me see if I can paste it into our Group description and make it live...

hopefully the certifieds are mature enough AND this would be an awesome incentive to get certified.

I like this idea a lot. Haven't had much time to spent on the site since the conference, but I should be back to normal in a couple months. Looking forward to it.
CompBanker’s Career Guidance Services: https://www.rossettiadvisors.com/
 
bearing:
Is the fantasy football league already full?
Yea but feel free to start your own with other CU bros. There were a lot of people interested and a 20 person league is less than ideal
If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
 

Sorry I'm a bit late to the party, folks.

CU Happy Hours would be terrific and would be a bit nicer to not have to hide behind anonymity.

But agreed with Frieds here: BlackHat, the Happy Hours are a great time, and in general draw a knowledgable, chill crowd. If you're uncomfortable with saying who you are, you can just say you're a new user or something. Frieds are usually pretty open about who we are. Just don't find yourself on the receiving end of one of his recaps.

Metal. Music. Life. www.headofmetal.com
 

I believe bfin (not a CU) is running last year's FF league again. I'd PM him or request to join here: http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/its-that-time-of-year-again-fanta…

We're looking for more established users to join, as last year we had a bunch of random drive-by WSO users join, and they abandoned their team after a few weeks.

 

I'm part Librarian, part Gambler, part Time Traveler. In my defense though, I have insiders on staff with ESPN, RotoWire and Yahoo!Sports that I do a lot of consulting with for my drafts so there goes the Librarian portion.

 

im definitely in for fantasy football if you guys have any extra spots. also, i tried to add a long post from my cell phone but it looks like it didnt get added for whatever reason. I would be all for a CU networking event, and it would definitely make me much more inclined to try to make it out. I haven't been posting as much as I'd like to but hopefully i'll be getting back in on the action soon.

 

While catching up on what's gone on in this thread, I saw something in particular that made me just skip everything else and have to comment immediately before I forget.

Chat for Certified Users.... would be... unbelievable.

Also, will be back in the city in a couple of days, would be happy to snag a brew with some of the real men of genius around here.

And agree with a lot of what you guys are saying on some of the college kids and the happy hour stuff. I definitely got a bit overwhelmed over the past few weeks with absolutely ridiculous PMs and Gmails that made me lose hope in the younger generation, haha. That said, there's definitely a lot of good apples around here who I've been really happy to be able to watch see some success by making all the right moves (Whiskey, WhiteHat, Unknown4Eva come to mind... all great kids).

But yeah, to echo myself... CU Chat. All day! Would also be a great way to talk trash when I start my Penn-State-Too-Soon-Laced Fantasy Football Dominance this season.

I hate victims who respect their executioners
 
In The Flesh:
So how many of you guys will be coming to Thursday's general Happy Hour? We can try for a Certified-User only hangout sometime next week if need be.
There'd better be one, since Boston's hitting it up this Thursday too, and I clearly can't very well be in two places at once.
Currently: future neurologist, current psychotherapist Previously: investor relations (top consulting firm), M&A consulting (Big 4), M&A banking (MM)
 

I think the rankings are default as they are the same in my other leagues which do not have the bonuses attached to QB performance.

If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
 

As a strategy consultant, let me say that this site is the only real online community for us out there.

I love the finance people and respect the hell out of what they do. Now, I do criticize when I see something to criticize, but I admire and respect the intellectual prowess of everyone here. Douche-ness of some members aside, the ambition here is what motivates me when a lot of my college classmates and work colleagues are not equally as motivated.

I wish I could attend the happy hours but I hear they're on Thursdays? If there are Friday ones, I can try to make it (I'm from Philly and fly back Thursday night). Since I won't be able to make it, feel free to add me on Linkedin and hit me up. IBM has a lot of resources that I can make available to you since I have access to all internal controls hahahah (if you want to find a contact person or whatnot). http://www.linkedin.com/pub/ronald-angsiy/5/8a1/416

MY SUGGESTION FOR THE SITE: You need 50 posts minimum before you can SB/MS people. Sooooooo many people make alt accounts just to up/neg people. It's a joke. I know there's a rule against not having alt accounts, which I've adhered to now...but it's almost unfair that others are being abusive with the reputation aspect of the site.

 
Xepa:
As a strategy consultant, let me say that this site is the only real online community for us out there.

I love the finance people and respect the hell out of what they do. Now, I do criticize when I see something to criticize, but I admire and respect the intellectual prowess of everyone here. Douche-ness of some members aside, the ambition here is what motivates me when a lot of my college classmates and work colleagues are not equally as motivated.

I wish I could attend the happy hours but I hear they're on Thursdays? If there are Friday ones, I can try to make it (I'm from Philly and fly back Thursday night). Since I won't be able to make it, feel free to add me on Linkedin and hit me up. IBM has a lot of resources that I can make available to you since I have access to all internal controls hahahah (if you want to find a contact person or whatnot). http://www.linkedin.com/pub/ronald-angsiy/5/8a1/416

MY SUGGESTION FOR THE SITE: You need 50 posts minimum before you can SB/MS people. Sooooooo many people make alt accounts just to up/neg people. It's a joke. I know there's a rule against not having alt accounts, which I've adhered to now...but it's almost unfair that others are being abusive with the reputation aspect of the site.

New user now can't MS on any other users unless their account has been active for over a week...should deter a lot of that nonsense...also, users can only PM once they have 20 bananas.

 

Sigh just realized no more chat. That is unfortunate. You think our chat was crazy should see some of my bbg persistent chats hahaha.

"Oh the ladies ever tell you that you look like a fucking optical illusion" - Frank Slaughtery 25th Hour.
 

Enim molestiae veniam atque dolores voluptas id. Placeat veritatis porro officiis deleniti. Cumque dolor adipisci quasi nesciunt accusamus magni. Vitae qui vitae voluptate dolorem neque.

Corporis ut est reiciendis debitis. Adipisci rerum quia similique voluptas. Tempore nostrum odio repellendus aut explicabo. Ad sunt nihil eligendi veritatis omnis fugiat. Quas iure aut distinctio minus fugit quae harum.

Here's the thing. If you can't spot the sucker in the first half hour at the table, you are the sucker.
 

Asperiores occaecati ut cum aliquam ex molestiae. Ut et iste laboriosam et ab eos eius sint. Id delectus magnam et architecto quisquam qui. Tempore illum sit aut.

Exercitationem voluptatum incidunt accusamus. Quas magnam qui pariatur dolores et. Labore eos sunt rem facilis.

Labore est libero velit voluptatum velit pariatur facilis placeat. Odio tenetur odit est quas facilis. Quae placeat enim omnis dignissimos nemo sunt. Amet quia quia labore nihil ipsam aut vel.

Eaque dolor quas consequuntur ea consequatur. Delectus rerum eos harum. Vel repellat voluptatem perferendis error nesciunt delectus.

Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/_KarateBoy_

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”