Ridiculous SWE Pay at HF/Trading?

A couple people I know received SWE offers from hedge funds/trading firms like Citadel Securities and Hudson River Trading and their first year compensation was on average 425k with the max at 550k. All fresh out of undergrad. They mentioned that they expect to be paid at around 7 figures by 7-10 years in.


Is back office pay this good now?

 

Lol, no they aren't. I know dozens of people in these roles. These roles being hard to get is a myth perpetuated on this website.
 

  • Plenty of bootcamp grads and literal college dropouts in these jobs
  • Many of these jobs don't even ask for GPA
  • There's an order of magnitude or two more of these jobs than there are good IB positions
  • The only barrier to entry is relatively rudimentary data structures and algorithms questions that can be essentially memorized off of leetcode

Literally every single person at my school who wanted a FAANG job and majored in CS got one, without exception. Not even in the same realm of competitiveness as top finance opportunities. If you go to a decent school (not just Ivy, I'm talking top 50), are moderately intelligent, and seriously try for one of these jobs, you will get one. 

 
Most Helpful

Just to debunk some myths, you are exaggerating tech pay out of college by $50-100k. Outside of exceptional circumstances, fresh grads are hired into L3 or equivalent roles, where you can see the distribution of pay pretty clearly for FAANG (note that Netflix famously does not hire new grads): 

https://www.levels.fyi/company/Facebook/salaries/Software-Engineer/E3/

https://www.levels.fyi/company/Amazon/salaries/Software-Engineer/SDE-I/

https://www.levels.fyi/company/Apple/salaries/Software-Engineer/ICT2/

https://www.levels.fyi/company/Google/salaries/Software-Engineer/L3/

Across the companies you mentioned, pay centers pretty squarely at $180k. You can see the top decile of the distribution for the role is 220k, and these tend to be in more expensive / high tax cities, for people who went to better schools, did well on their interviews, and had competitive offers (perhaps from quant finance). Moreover, longer term pay pales in comparison to most finance roles, this view is quite helpful for seeing that: 

https://www.levels.fyi/?compare=Apple,Amazon,Google,Facebook&track=Soft…

The expected path for most engineers is to work up to L5 / Senior Software Engineer (most in this bucket are 6-12 YOE), where pay levels off at $350-400k. After this point, it is rare to advance, most people stall out here. About 1/20 serious candidates make it another level up (L6 / staff engineer), and 1/100 make it two levels up. However, L7 is still a couple hundred k shy of the 7 figures range, and most people who do manage to achieve this level are into their 30s/40s with 10-30 YOE. 

Point is, trying to compete with tech isn't really what is driving wage growth at the top end of the quant market, top quant firms could pay less and still comfortably beat out tech from a compensation perspective (and vs. tech are helped by the fact that a segment of the best talent has become self-selecting, coming in knowing they prefer to work in quant over tech). The more important driver is quant firms have increased the extent to which they are willing to pay top dollar for the best talent on the market, which is exacerbated because they are competing with each other instead (don't want to overstate this point, but if HRT likes a top quant profile these days and fails to hire them, the odds the candidate goes to work at Citadel Sec and trades against them is much higher than it used to be, vs. 5-10 years ago when the same candidate was less self selecting and more likely to end up at Facebook). 

You are right that most people on this forum have the impression it is harder to get a FAANG job than it actually is, but you are exaggerating it 25-50% like you did with the wages. 

 

disregard my title

I used to be a IT project manager at an HFT firm and was getting 250k at 40 hours a week working a true back office job.  few years out of undergrad.  decided to move over to a business/finance career not because of money, I just couldn't handle dealing with uber nerds all day.

I had a liberal arts degree too.  Managing IT systems projects.  250k comp in my 20s...not bad for back office lol

 

Someone quoted to me 20% average YoY growth. So by year 2, total compensation should be close to year 1 compensation, and meet/beat (depending on performance) by year 3.

Apparently the compensation is difficult to generalize as disparity grows a lot wider

 

300-500k is the "new normal" for top of market quant new grads going to the best firms. SWE is pretty much a front office role at trading firms now (though not at quant hedge funds). In HFT every year people at the top figured out it is higher ROI to take what a quant trader is doing and replace it with software, to the point where if I ever wanted to go back into HFT I would prefer to do it as a SWE (esp. at HRT, less so at Citadel) as it is basically the same comp with much less risk. 

Others are suggesting that competition from tech is driving wages, but that is really not the case. levels.fyi provides transparent data on tech wages and shows a big tech new grad typically gets < $200k in comp without much variance on that number. Most of the quant openings pay about the same as big tech (maybe 10-20% higher) for entry level, but the best firms have recently shifted to paying a fat premium for the very best young talent in a small number of roles (would say this started around 2017-2019). My perspective on this has always been firms are getting much better at converting young talent into revenue generators quickly (though it is much harder to do this with B players), so its becoming less of a gamble to pay to lock down the best talent from the start. Also, these roles have rightfully becoming riskier with the wage increase, where if the new hire doesn't live up to expectations they are just as quickly shown the door. 

 

Am I crazy for thinking that 7 figs 7-10 years out isn’t that crazy? Yes these people are top performers in school, but top performers in L/S or PE are paid 7 figs as well? I’ve always thought that HFT pays a lot out of ugrad to compete with big tech for intellectual talent, but after that the pay progression slows down compared to other areas of finance. Obviously 7 figs is a lot but presumably if you can get a HFT job you could also get a banking/PE job out of ugrad

 

Apparently you can go work in MF PE, exit to Tiger Global, and make 7-8 figures within 3 years of working there...those numbers eclipse HFT

 

Im currently a SWE at a top prop trading firm in London (ignore my title) and while the pay is indeed very high starting out (~£200k+), the comp progression still pales in comparison to what the traders can earn. 7 figures for senior traders is far more common than 7 figures for senior SWEs. I would guess my comp ceiling would be around £500-600k after 8+ years if I perform very well. But there's also less risk and lower stress/hours so it's a decent tradeoff.

 

varies a lot but my desk's junior traders (< 3 yoe) are on £250-400k+ this year and I would expect my desk's senior trader (5 yoe) to be on at least £1m+.

 

Adipisci magnam tenetur corporis aut repellat dolor. Debitis et repellat qui. Reiciendis est quibusdam natus. Similique blanditiis voluptatem voluptatem et ad excepturi. Accusantium eaque repudiandae officia voluptatem explicabo facilis ipsam eum.

Tenetur autem dicta soluta. Dignissimos totam necessitatibus expedita. Voluptatibus cumque quas possimus aut nobis sit.

Quis repellendus facere labore a est eum ratione. Quia id enim tempora inventore. Iusto qui enim sit repellendus reiciendis. At in eveniet dolores quisquam. Non quo quidem nostrum tempore qui. Commodi esse omnis nesciunt eos voluptatibus libero.

Nemo eaque voluptates adipisci dolorem voluptates nostrum voluptas deserunt. Molestiae eligendi iusto error ipsum ut. Facere vel recusandae nihil voluptatem.

 

Impedit cumque aspernatur mollitia reiciendis sit eos. Omnis voluptas doloremque architecto cupiditate ut ad. Velit fuga blanditiis repellat cumque enim.

In repellendus qui possimus reprehenderit ex in. Autem delectus consectetur fuga culpa est. A tempore ipsa tenetur iste nisi. Vel ut sint non temporibus praesentium impedit.

Dolore qui vero nam quasi quo voluptas. Quisquam est culpa reiciendis distinctio doloremque sed et. Atque quas vitae amet repellat non ducimus. Libero eum ullam qui autem itaque veniam doloribus laboriosam. Cum molestiae aperiam doloremque quod ducimus eveniet.

Quae voluptatum quis molestiae autem debitis. Deserunt exercitationem repudiandae exercitationem a recusandae. Placeat cupiditate quam vel est architecto pariatur nam. Quae sed voluptatum quasi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 96.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (249) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”