I've only half-hazardly looked into the history of rouge, but it seems that in every instance at a major bank the culprit is always someone who started from either a position.
Do you guys think that this is a fault within a system or a system fault? Do past BO/MO feel that they need to prove themselves more, hence take more risk? Are they unfairly scapegoated? Or are these events simply coincidences?
FYI. I dont wanna bash on MO/BO, nor do I care about their ability to move into. I simply want to know if social structure is set up in such a way that encourages these individuals into recklessness.