If given a choice, I would definitely choose S&T anytime, anyday, anywhere. I'm doing an IB internship in JPM right now and honestly, the hours are totally F@#KED up. As an analyst, you are expected to put in at least 80-100 hours per week. The money's great, no doubt. But it's just not worth it.

In S&T, if the desk/group has a bumper year, the bonus can easily outstrip the IB analyst monkeys' bonus. Furthermore, a trader works like, what? 45-50 hours per week? Go figure which is better.

 

how much less? a few of us are in the range of 50k-70k, i'm sure a few others get 80k which is the top for first year in banking as well though i can't confirm. but it's definitely not inferior to banking even at analyst level.

 

anyone recommend any books to read to get an idea about the profession? Also, where should you be looking to start (position wise, not company) if you have an undergrad degree from a non-target, high GPA, good extra curriculars/ volunteer work, but not necessarily the strongest directly applicable internships?

 

At the analyst levels, the money is virtually the same. However, this changes later on (if you're good), as the top paid guy in a bank is almost always a trader and not a banker.

 
Best Response

3 things determine bonus for analysts outside of being in a program. 1. company performance, 2. group performance, 3) personal performance. If you are in a training program on the trading side, bonuses ranged in the 20K neighborhood for the first 2 years with base of 55-60K.

In MBS, analysts generally get 1X base salary. MBA or BA doesnt really play a factor on the T & S side. I think it applies more on the banking side. My experience for T&S has been that analysts working in BB banks will make for year end comp. approx. 120-180 all in.

In Ibank, generally analysts work for 2 year then get their MBA. Hence when they return, they come in as associates.

No BS totally speaking from experience

 
Fearing that you chose the wrong career path? Have fun slaving away for less money.

Have fun getting fired for your mediocre P&L and having nowhere to go.

Anyway, I'm not taking back what I said. A 1st year "trading asst" is probably not going to get paid $140k to "assist traders."

 

Just read a bloomberg article in the "agenda" section. It was reported that the top energy traders at MS and JPMorgan (Olav Refvik and George Taylor respectively) took home at least $10 mil in 2006. That compares with about $1.5 mil for top bond traders.

One thing's for sure...trader's bonuses are definitely way more than ibankers's.

 

Last year the top trader at goldman made $45 million. And your right, most people dont make that much but on average, good traders make a lot more than good bankers. The trading department brings in a whole lot more revenue than M&A.

 

According to the 2005 annual reports of both GS and Lehman, trading revenues account up to 70% of their total revenue. Furthermore, on a per employee basis, traders definitely bring in more revenue than ibankers.

Just quoting off GS's 2005 revenue figures: Investment Banking: US$3.67 Bn Trading and Principal Investments: US$16.36 Bn

For Lehman's: Investment Banking: US$2.89 Bn Capital Markets (Trading): US$9.81 Bn

 

do you guys think there are huge differences in bonuses between the equity desk and the fixed income desk? what are the sales bonuses like in equities or equity derivatives?

 

In nearly every bank fixed income blows equity out of the water. With equity derivs you might be a little better off, but straight equities is where they send the idiots who can't cut it. As an example, look at all the finance Phd's coming out of all the top b-schools into structured FI trading; now try to find one on an equities desk.

 

equities are where all the jocks are. you don't need any sort of finance backround to trade equities. ED's are a different story though, plenty of quants in ED's.

 

Don't think about bonuses...think about profitability and how you can contribute.....the best traders these days are hardcore quant types who live and breathe trading, mathematics, quant research etc etc. Those king bond traders are math geniuses who have figured out an arbitrage that noone else can see (espescially the FI OTC derivatives boys and their exotic models). The P&L on these highly customised and illiqui deals is mind boggling and very sustainable....Increasingly trading is becoming the domain of quants and computer scientists....the cowboy days are nearing an end...quants with high level risk management abilities will rule the roost.

 

I agree with not thinking about it, but for what it's worth it really is about 5-10k less than banking....total comp can therefore be 140K. And if you're on the right desk or smart enough, most of the time wont be spent getting food.

Additionally, being quant is great and all, but not all traders are quant. There is a fine line between being a good number cruncher / model builder, and being the head of a desk. The latter requires more personality/leadership skills, and some firms are willing to sacrifice raw math skills for the softer techniques. That said, being good at math is really, really important nonetheless.

 

I completely agree that the quants are taking over, equities are a much harder game then it was even 2 years ago esp as markets are moving electronic these days. on that note, right now i work for a small group of prop floor traders, i accidently saw their tax returns from a few years ago and it was mostly in the 3-10mm range, it is significantly less this year think under 1mm....not good for me since I'm a TA that just started with them this summer :(

 

It's great that this board is here to help people think about career paths, but there is a ton of misinformation here. Here's the basic lowdown

analyst salaries: sales and trading bonuses for bulge bracket positions at the analyst level are almost exactly the same as corporate finance

associate salaries: here's where the differentiation starts to open up depending on your position and how you're doing. traders> --If you're a trader, your salary is going to be based on your utility as a market-maker and on your P&L. for a first year associate on a desk with decent flow and couple bucks in P&L, between 250-300. --as your P&L scales, your salary will follow approximately linearly. there are definitely associates who will make over a million, but that of that as the 5-10% tail of the distribution; it definitely helps to be in a less commoditized product area sales & research> --if you're a saleperson or in research your take-home is going to be more or less in line with banking

vp salaries: --here's where the variation becomes much more significant. while you have a much better sense of how your salary will scale in corporate finance, in S&T it will depend highly on your P&L, which goes for sales and trading --an average trader in a mature market will have a good amount of variation in his salary year to year, but will probably see it swing somewhere in the broad band of 300k-1000k depending on their p&l; numbers improve for less commoditized products and of course for top traders the sky is the limit --an average sales person in a mature market will see take home pay between 400-600k while a top salesperson might take home a million; in less commoditized product areas they might see 1.5-2mln

trading responsibility: --contrary to some suggestions, analyst traders are not lunch-fetching monkeys. that doesn't mean you will never get lunch, especially in your first few months, but most analysts begin executing transactions and taking on risk within the first year of starting

 

Good points on. But I'd add that top sales people at a desk with primarily structured products (i.e. commodities, structured credit, etc.) can clear much more than 1-2mm per year. Not as much as the top traders on the desk, but much, much more.

 

Actually, the majority of the revenue on the top commodities trading desks is definitely from structured products. The most basic products the top commodities desks deal with are usually swaps and options, but these flow products are not the big money makers. And the real growth at the top desks is in power, which is almost entirely structured products (bespoke hedging soln for power generation, utilities, etc.). In addition, some of he biggest growth in in CCOs (collateralized commodity obligations), which are similar to synthetic CDOs.

 

Salary + 5-10% of P&L for prop traders is the norm. Of course in your first year you are not going to be given that much to trade so you should be expecting salary plus small bonus. I've known people who were promoted to VP after one year - conversely I've known people at my former BB who were kicked out after one bad trade.

At my HF we pay our first year research analyst roughly $55k (depending on $/£ exchange rates) plus a (very small) share of the firm wide profits. After a few years they get a much large perecentage. As a point of ref I got a very comfortable six figure basic and about as much again in bonus last year bringing me very close to a bar.

 

Sint ut repudiandae repellat aut nihil voluptas autem ut. Deserunt nemo id illum. Enim id veritatis et corporis.

Velit inventore aspernatur neque qui est. Et illum expedita iste quia maxime.

Eos provident vitae quod in non nesciunt assumenda aut. Voluptas rerum odio nesciunt mollitia. Ut quasi consequatur animi. Ut vel sed distinctio dicta nobis deserunt eum voluptatibus. Molestiae ut quia possimus non nihil tempora.

Laudantium ut pariatur quo doloremque tempore et eveniet repellat. Qui ipsam consectetur voluptatem laudantium iusto aut sit.

 

Dolores et voluptatum quibusdam consequatur alias unde dolores. Est facilis ut corrupti dolor vitae reprehenderit. Sed ratione esse est et doloremque facilis excepturi reiciendis. Possimus et quam quos velit et. Ad sapiente occaecati facere.

Commodi ut aut sed inventore et id animi. Facere qui nisi dolores.

 

Est vitae amet quo nisi dolorum consequatur consequuntur. Ea vel tenetur at blanditiis accusantium. Repellat porro nisi ipsam nulla. Qui a veniam quos omnis.

Alias sed et ut est quod et. Corporis rerum assumenda rerum culpa officia ratione.

Quia possimus nostrum commodi est veritatis reprehenderit. Quasi natus et ut aliquam animi qui temporibus quia. Nulla molestiae non sunt.

Voluptate et sit iure quis. Labore voluptates quia tenetur repellat tempore ullam et.

I banana back

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”