Should I take a demotion in order to move upmarket / upstream?

Was recently promoted at a traditional MM bank and have the opportunity to move upstream/upmarket to an elite boutique (Evercore, Moelis, Greenhill, Centerview, PWP), but was told I would likely go in back at my prior level.

I have a strong desire to move upmarket and get better deal flow from where I am, but I'm concerned about going backwards in hopes of doing this. It aligns with my long-term goals, but if I leave IB in the future, will this be looked at negatively by employers?

Also, where would you draw the line for accepting a demotion to move upstream? In other words, if I decide to wait, I assume it will get more difficult, but would anything actually change?

Associate back to Analyst
VP back to Associate
Director back to VP

 

EB would actually be higher in its comp set relative to MM. Was told probably a year in demoted role before a repromotion. Other factors: group at the EB is enticing vertical, would be in a major metro market, not sure what else I can provide detail on

 

As everyone mentioned, you should take the demotion if the EB is the path you want. It's something I have done myself (associate to analyst) and it is well worth it in the long run, particularly since your added experience will contribute to you performing very strongly at your new job.

 

I see 3 possible paths:

1 - You're a stud and refuse to drop a level and so you put the ball in their court to accept or ding you 2 - Look at the horizon and realize it's 1 year in a long potential career in this industry and accept the challenge 3 - Not move and stay at your MM because you love your title and status.

Short term gains = long term pains

26 Broadway where's your sense of humor?
 

I would push to keep same title. Ultimately, if the firm wants you, then it will concede this point. Otherwise, the firm could be lukewarm on you and could be viewing you as an opportunistic hire, which might not bode well for you going forward anyways. In banking, top-tier rank / high comp earners remain top-tier rank / high comp earners.

 

If you have the requisite skill set, they will promote you back when ready. You don't need to write you resume in a way that shows the demotion so it shouldn't be an issue going forward as long as you actually do get the promotion.

I'm guessing that you are currently at an obscure firm, and, if that is the case, this isn't all that unusual. I would go for it.

 

If it's associate to analyst I think it could make sense. I likely wouldn't take the demotion any higher than that. I don't think you'll be able to push hard for associate as frankly I think juniors are fairly commoditized from a hiring perspective at most shops so I'm certain their 1b is probably a good enough candidate. You could raise that it's important to you but barring that I would just want to be very specific on expectations / timeline for you to get bumped back up. Leaving it open-ended, while not necessarily a bad thing opens you up to potentially getting screwed whereas the closer you can get to a situation where they say you'll be promoted at a certain time if you do x,y and z is a fair outcome if it's a firm / sector you want to be in.

 
Best Response

With the assumption that being a coverage banker is my long-term career dream, this is a trade I'd take ten out of ten times.

It's massively Accretive. They're essentially saying, "Hey, we like you, but we don't know how the culture and ethos of your prior employer has shaped you. We're willing to take a flier on you as an asset, but we want to make sure you fill the shoes before handing you the keys to a role with a lot of responsibility.

I actually disagree with juniormistmaker. I see this more commonly at the VP1/A3 level, where someone got the VP seat at a lower-tier firm and the prospective employer is a bit concerned about how well the product of that environment translates to their own. They then ask the candidate to 'repeat' as a senior-level Associate, eyeing them the whole time as to whether they have the qualitative, harder to judge skills that are necessary for success at the VP level.

For the OP, this ultimately boils down to career aspirations.

If this is an Analyst/Associate thing, the comp difference is meaningless in the long run (and the short run too; seriously, the post-tax delta here is minimal). If this is an Associate/VP thing, I can see how the comp hit may make this take a further moment of thought. I don't think a firm of any real caliber asks an MD to step back down from MD to ED or Director.

Regardless of the level of seniority, if banking is your long-term career interest, moving to a better shop and gaining all the measurable and intangible benefits it brings is the smart choice. - better dealflow (and thus transaction experience) - stronger comp - broader professional development resources - stronger senior bankers to learn from and mature under - more recognizable brand name - smarter coworkers (this is something people tend to undervalue) - better professional service providers (lawyers, accountants, valuation, etc.) - meatier infrastructure layer (expense accounts, admins, T&E policy, etc.) - I could go on

In short, I don't draw the line. If banking is what you want to do, you take the shot to get to the better firm. The difference based on title during your first year is nominal, and adjusted for duration, imperceptible.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 

Maiores vitae odio qui ullam tempora et. Ut dolorum cum corrupti expedita harum. Labore at quis hic autem et et itaque ut. Et suscipit eius assumenda ea repellat rerum.

Nemo labore sint rerum tempora facilis asperiores. Dolorum fugit odio nostrum et. Cumque accusantium voluptatibus nesciunt et. Consequatur est impedit ut quam ullam. Repellendus officiis voluptate nihil sit. Soluta accusantium quibusdam nesciunt rerum. Aperiam nemo et voluptatum assumenda ut cupiditate consequuntur.

Expedita esse sit rem libero incidunt laboriosam quisquam quisquam. Molestiae deserunt voluptas qui praesentium sit nam voluptatum. Qui aut a sapiente explicabo consequatur. Veniam consequatur commodi reprehenderit ut. Aut eveniet quia optio quos. Dolores nostrum quia voluptas doloribus doloribus ab.

Work hard, work clean, & most of all do not give up.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”