Software Engineer (FAANG) to top-5 MBA? Is it worth it? Exit Ops?

Background:
I'm a 26 y/o software engineer at a FAANG company, and I'm on track to become an engineering manager in the near future. I'm very good at software engineering as well as dealing with people/other engineers – in other words, my job is going (very) well. However, I find myself desperately craving a more business-side role involving finance, biz strategy, etc.

I genuinely enjoy the subject matter of finance/investing – I spend about 3-5 after work each day reading and obsessing over it. (This isn't to say the practical work environment of a typical financial firm is something I'm necessarily interested in...)

Additionally, I'm interested in business strategy and, for lack of a better term, "higher level" thinking, as it pertains to the success of a business. I find engineering – at nearly all levels – to be myopic (on a relative basis).

I am considering getting an MBA from a top-5 (perhaps 10) school, with a preference for HBS and Wharton, or maybe MIT or Columbia. This would be an entry point into a broader set of career opportunities (with the obvious downside of forgoing a FAANG salary for two years, erasing my savings to pay for the MBA, and doing a partial career reset. The upside, I would hope, is obvious in the long run.)

Question:
Does anyone here have advice for this type of situation?

Is my thinking more or less correct than an MBA may be helpful in this case? Or, is the grass always greener and the benefits of an MBA not worth it given my current projection? (In tech, many directors, and even higher, simply climbed the ladder over time.)

Some may say: "You are killing it in your current position; keep doing what you're doing because you have an edge over many other tech people, given your soft-skills + technical skills. Good things will happen if you continually and aggressively look for opportunities."

Others may say: "You will hit a ceiling, and by the time you do, it's too late. No matter what soft-skills you may have, you also need to have a rigorous set of academic credentials to "de-risk" yourself and showcase your non-technical interests."

Thoughts and alternative viewpoints appreciated.

 
Most Helpful

Getting an MBA from a top school would be a way to hit “reset” and get into a strategy type role. And with a software engineering background, if you go back into a FAANG it could make you a pretty attractive candidate as you’ll understand the firm from both a high level business perspective and the technical side of things.

That said, take a look at the strategy / business development type executives and directors at your current FAANG firm. Do they all have their MBAs, or did some of them come from a more technical background? It might be good to grab coffee with some of these people and get their thoughts on their career development. In addition to those folks, also see if you can find people more junior in those roles (both with and without a tech background) and chat with them for their view.

I recall a rather long thread on WSO where one guy was an mba hire into a FAANG, and complained that because he didn’t come from a technical background and it’s really the people with software eng b/g that are respected at his firm, that he felt he made a mistake joining one out of MBA. However, he might have been in the finance division, and he also was someone that was aiming for IB and didn’t get in - so his thread might not be the most helpful for you.

 

Thanks for your input. I think doing some further research and meeting with people, internal to my firm, and seeing what turns up may be very helpful. Good advice.

As a corollary to your second point – I think it's safe to say that if you intend on being successful at a tech firm, an MBA alone won't be any sort of "golden ticket". Most high ranking people do have in-depth engineering experience somewhere on their resume, even if it was 20+ years ago and tangential to their current line of work.

 

Delectus nisi omnis consequatur perferendis sed. Quam molestias doloribus qui sunt qui. Eos qui sit vel.

Ea est harum quis cupiditate. Incidunt sed est maxime vero. Sit ipsa dolorum quis ut amet sapiente. Iure quia error corporis atque est porro et pariatur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”