Best Response

I'm going to bump this because I came on to ask a similar question about WACC. A colleague of mine states that WACC is tax adjusted to account for the CAPM which is implicitly tax effected. I've always thought that the cost of debt was tax effected to account for tax benefits. If it is the former, then the reason we use say 39% is because we assume that the purchaser is gaining an incremental benefit from the company, that is to say that your company should be taxed at the rate of the next dollar earned. Lower tax rates in US firms are largely related to credits and foreign operations. If you can make the argument that your tax should be lower, then by all means run with it and get ready for battle on review.

 
jack_donaghy:
I'm going to bump this because I came on to ask a similar question about WACC. A colleague of mine states that WACC is tax adjusted to account for the CAPM which is implicitly tax effected. I've always thought that the cost of debt was tax effected to account for tax benefits.

It is always the cost of debt that is tax effected..to account for the interest tax shield.

Can anyone answer as to why we use effective tax rate for calculation of FCF whereas Statutory for calculation of WACC???

 

"In doing projections, it is far safer to use the marginal tax rate since the effective tax rate is really a reflection of the difference between the accounting and the tax books. By using the marginal tax rate, we tend to understate the after-tax operating income in the earlier years, but the after-tax tax operating income is more accurate in later years If you choose to use the effective tax rate, adjust the tax rate towards the marginal tax rate over time." (A. Damodaran)

I'm grateful that I have two middle fingers, I only wish I had more.
 

Explicabo sunt accusamus rerum soluta. Dicta vel et sed dolores aut voluptas. Velit qui autem perspiciatis dolores voluptatem culpa.

Cupiditate molestiae non qui porro. Ut dolorem aliquam molestias et. Animi est sit excepturi omnis deserunt. Et officiis odit aperiam maiores. Sint cum sunt sed consequatur rerum eum. Delectus laudantium asperiores rerum repudiandae.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”