Target school superthread

An experiment. A few 'superthreads' (10xleverage on PE) have proved extremely informative in the past, so I am going to see if these can be somewhat replicated. The point is to create a "thread to end all threads" about the given topic. First up: TARGET VS. NONTARGET

Target school – Have heavy on-campus recruiting by top firms (banks, consulting, etc) and are thus well represented on Wall Street. A 75 percentile student at a target can expect 1st round interviews at most firms

Semi target – Siginificantly less recruiting that at targets. Get many students into good firms, but only a few into top ones. A 90 percentile student here will have many good, and some great, opportunities:

Reaches – these nontarget schools place very few people onto WallStreet. Only the top .5% will have any shot. GS/MS M/B/B placements happen to 2 people/ year

Super reach . Getting onto WallStreet from one of these is an herculean feat that only a few talented/ lucky individuals will manage

After strong objections got rid of my examples for each category. Point is now to populate (with justification) the list

This will make some of the first 10 or so comments seem disjointed...

SBs to anyone who creates a visual of this ( a chart showing relative distribution of people from each type of school?)

 

I'm going to say this now... This is a bad idea. It's been discussed ad infinitum. Just use the damned search button if you're so damned concerned to bring up all the past arguments.

Again, let me say that this is going to be a very bad idea.

 

I completely agree with Frieds, this thread is going to go up in flames.

The reason 10xLev's PE thread was a success was because he was in a relatively unique position to provide insight about a path that is almost universally desired (Target School => MS M&A => KKR) but has very little credible information out there.

College rankings on the other hand are something EVERYONE on this site will feel he/she has the authority to give perspective (and they do). Furthermore, rankings are highly subjective by firm and by region, so the people in SF/LA/Chicago/Boston are going to have something ENTIRELY different to say.

It's just gonna end up being a carnival-o-bitching about whether or not Brown is a Target, why someone will take Berkeley/NYU/UMich over Yale/Duke/MIT "every day", whether UVA/UNC/UCLA should be a semi, and why the fuck you even listed ASU while forgetting about UChicago/CMU/Emory, etc.

Not discouraging you from going through with this, simply getting an early post in so I can say "I told you so" later.

“Millionaires don't use astrology, billionaires do”
 

I can see what you're trying to accomplish here, but this is going to turn into a shit show especially with your somewhat condescending comments towards certain schools:

dazedmonk:
Notre Dame – strong Wallstreet network. Not sure why/how this came to be Arizona State – another well-networked school sneaks in. No idea why.

There are several semi-targets that should be added into this list as well.

 

OP is retarded and possibly a troll as well

"The right to have children should be a marketable commodity, bought and traded by individuals but absolutely limited by the state."—Kenneth Boulding
 
Best Response

The "if you can't get a BB gig you're a social retard" group -- Harvard Yale Princeton Wharton Columbia

"Way too cool/smart for I-Banking" crowd -- MIT Cal Tech Stanford Chicago

Targets -- Every other Ivy Williams/Amherst, other top 10 lib arts colleges Duke Georgetown UVA Michigan NYU Stern

Semi-Targets -- Every other top 30 school / top 20 liberal arts college In particular: Northwestern, Cal, UNC, BC, Lehigh, UT, Emory West Point, Naval academy

Other schools -- Pretty much any top 50-75 school you have a decent shot

Regional powerhouses -- Chicago: Northwestern, Notre Dame, IU Charlotte: Hodgepodge of good-to-decent Southern schools Texas: UT, UT, UT West coast: USC, UCLA, Cal

From my experience this is what it looks like. I also have the last 2 years of data from 3 BB SA books and have asked around a bit. PM if you have any pressing questions... but if you just want to nitpick then it's probably not worth it.

 

When even blastoise know's you're wrong, then it's time to get off WSO

"The right to have children should be a marketable commodity, bought and traded by individuals but absolutely limited by the state."—Kenneth Boulding
 

WSO has a FAQ that happens to cover this topic.

"You stop being an asshole when it sucks to be you." -IlliniProgrammer "Your grammar made me wish I'd been aborted." -happypantsmcgee
 

The point was to make the thread useful by adding/ subtracting. Thanks solidarity.

Only intelligent criticism on here is from D M. If there is a FAQ then this is clearly pointless

Frieds and Nouveau Rich, go ahead and get your "I told you sos" in so I can close this puppy

 

Target school – Harvard Princeton

Wharton

Yale MIT Stanford Columbia Brown

Dartmouth

Duke Cornell Chicago Northwestern CMU Georgetown Michigan UVA NYU Stern Amherst Williams Claremont

Semi target – Notre Dame Johns Hopkins Wash U UNC BC Penn (non-Wharton) NYU (non-Stern) Middlebury Wellesley Bowdoin Military Academies

Baruch

Georgia Tech Rice Tulane BU Haverford Carleton

Pomona

Other State flagships

Reaches – Other State non-flagships and crappy privates

Super reach . Fordham everyone else.......

 

Earum possimus cumque consequuntur est aut. Nam ullam cum eum possimus aut veniam explicabo. Voluptas quaerat ullam eveniet cupiditate ex saepe.

Sed fugiat aperiam ea. Odio ea est et quis. Quibusdam beatae debitis omnis hic. Voluptatem maiores fugiat qui occaecati iusto ratione.

Dicta eos quos voluptatibus doloribus distinctio. Veritatis rerum vitae cum minus quia. Pariatur dicta neque voluptatem nemo et. Incidunt amet et omnis assumenda dolorum consectetur provident sit. Fugit dolorum modi culpa harum possimus sequi. Eum ratione iste omnis sed et fuga.

Quas aut omnis tenetur ducimus. Aliquid tenetur et nostrum a. Vel et quaerat quia id quos. Dolorem ut incidunt quo minima repudiandae rerum soluta.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”