Taylor Warfield vs Victor Cheng’s Approach
Hi,
I’m a newbie to consulting and have been reading Taylor Warfields Hacking the Case Interview and also Victor Cheng’s Case Interview Secrets. Cheng’s book emphasizes having a hypothesis while Warfield’s book doesn’t mention anything related to that and suggests presenting a structured framework right after the introduction in a case interview. I was wondering which approach is technically better? I know that Warfields book is also more up to date. Thanks so much!
You need to have a framework, and having a hypothesis can be good to guide the questions you ask
It's important to remember though that there isn't a one-size-fits-all method to casing, e.g. if you force a hypothesis where it really doesn't make sense during an interview it won't be a good thing
Quo possimus quibusdam sed et sunt ipsum. Quaerat et nesciunt facere possimus sit voluptates eum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...