Tesla Is Said to Be Subpoenaed by S.E.C. Over Elon Musk Tweet

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/15/business/tesla…

https://static01.nyt.com/images/2018/08/16/business/16TESLA/merlin_142341348_779b6aff-329d-4a9c-80bf-5720d5f466c4-jumbo.jpg?quality=90&auto=webp

Federal securities regulators have served Tesla with a subpoena, according to a person familiar with the investigation, increasing pressure on the electric car company as it deals with the fallout from several recent actions by its chief executive, Elon Musk.

The subpoena, from the Securities and Exchange Commission, comes days after regulators began inquiring about an Aug. 7 Twitter post by Mr. Musk, in which he said he was considering converting Tesla to a private company. In the post, he said that the financing for such a transaction, which would probably run into the tens of billions of dollars, had been “secured.”

Tesla shares, a popular target for so-called short sellers who bet on certain stocks losing value, soared about 11 percent on the day Mr. Musk posted the message.

It has become clear since then that neither Mr. Musk nor Tesla had actually lined up the necessary financing aside from having preliminary conversations with some investors.

The Twitter post by Mr. Musk, who has considered taking Tesla private in the past, was something of a flip remark, said several people familiar with the matter but not authorized to speak publicly about the episode.

The serving of a subpoena, which typically requires the approval of top S.E.C. officials, indicates that an inquiry has advanced to a more formal, serious stage. It can take years for an investigation to yield any action, and some investigations do not result in any action.

Tesla’s board of directors has been scrambling to contain any potential damage caused by Mr. Musk’s Aug. 7 tweet. Some board members have urged Mr. Musk to stop using Twitter, and the board’s independent directors recently hired the law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison to represent it as the S.E.C. investigation progresses.

A subset of independent directors, who have formed a committee to consider any formal proposal to take Tesla private, has hired another law firm, Latham & Watkins.

And on Wednesday, Tesla hired Goldman Sachs to work on a possible going-private transaction, according to a client note reviewed by The New York Times.

News of the S.E.C. subpoena was first reported by Fox Business Network. Shares of Tesla were down more than 3 percent in trading on Wednesday.

Representatives of Tesla and the S.E.C. declined to comment.

The scope of the commission’s investigation, which is being led by the San Francisco office, is unclear. Even before Mr. Musk’s message on Aug. 7, the S.E.C. had been inquiring about issues at Tesla.

About a week earlier, Martin Tripp, a former Tesla employee who has filed a whistle-blower complaint against the company, was interviewed by commission officials over the phone, his lawyer, Stuart Meissner, said.

Mr. Tripp, who was an engineer at a Tesla battery plant in Nevada, said he had seen problems with some of the batteries installed in the company’s cars. He has accused Tesla of misleading investors about some production figures.

Tesla has sued Mr. Tripp, accusing him of trying to steal trade secrets. Mr. Tripp has said the company and Mr. Musk have wrongly portrayed him as a saboteur.

Over the past few months, there has been a war of words between the parties. But the dispute between Mr. Musk and Mr. Tripp has receded into the background amid the furor over Mr. Musk’s tweet about taking the company private.

 

Accusantium doloremque ut id deleniti ex eos. Quas aliquid ut aut cupiditate. Itaque illo quisquam veniam laborum qui animi. Repellendus ipsum ea reprehenderit neque et dolorem.

Sit voluptatibus fuga et omnis in. Deserunt esse aut ad veritatis ex dolor sed. Et vitae architecto quasi.

Recusandae est consectetur est voluptatum. Corporis magnam itaque veritatis. Rerum explicabo sit ea expedita.

Quidem sint non aut odit necessitatibus iusto occaecati. Voluptatum dicta perferendis et voluptate eaque. Id voluptates repellendus quod unde qui rerum aut. Numquam et et aut doloremque dolores animi officia facilis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”