The Infamous 400 Questions Guide
I know everyone uses this guide to prep for interviews for IB, but are there any other guides that are just as helpful for interviews? I've only been using the 400 questions, is that enough?
I know everyone uses this guide to prep for interviews for IB, but are there any other guides that are just as helpful for interviews? I've only been using the 400 questions, is that enough?
+187 | Is my life over after not getting GS? | 36 | 1d | |
+98 | How to stop feeling like shit for not making it in IB? | 40 | 2h | |
+59 | Updated LA Banking Scene (2024) | 42 | 1h | |
+48 | Military Officer vs. IB analyst | 19 | 2s | |
+45 | Why Is It Called Investment Banking? | 17 | 1d | |
+43 | If Tik Tok is forced to sell, what banks do you think would be involved in the deal? | 28 | 1s | |
+38 | best groups for energy transition? | 33 | 3h | |
+31 | UBS Actual Buyside Exits 2024 Post-Integration | 9 | 1d | |
+30 | Very ridiculous interview feedback | 15 | 1d | |
+30 | Got RBC offer but I have cold feet accepting. | 39 | 7h |
Career Resources
Depends on what bank. Its helpful to also use each of the BIWS guides (not the 400Q - the individual guides) and videos they have on each section (Accounting, DCF/valuation, EV and EQV, M&A, and LBO).
where do you find the BIWS guides?
.
Hi, can I get the pdfs. Thank you so much
Is anyone willing to send me the BIWS 400 Q guide? Thanks!
https://breakingintowallstreet.com/biws/investment-banking-interview-gu…
Read Investment Banking by R&P it will help you actually understand the topics and then look at the guide. This will help you remember the answers and be able to answer different variations of the standard questions that are essentially the same but require a little critical thinking. I think it’s pretty obvious who has memorized the guide and who actually has a decent enough understanding of the fundamentals to think through a unique question. Good Luck!
I agree with this heavily. I read R&P and took notes, and I got a really good conceptual understanding. Never read the guides and have not been challenged in technical interviews so far.
Purchase WSP’s Red Book. Helped me a lot
I found a free pdf of this with a quick Google search save yourself the $ but definitely check this out
Have used 400q guide last year. Was more than enough to get me through final rounds at BB/EBs.
The latest BIWS guides seem to get into a little too much detail or obsess over minor topics that's hardly ever used or asked in entry level positions/interviews. (topics such as how to treat Op. lease and how metrics are all broken because of that, relative value contribution in Merger Model, etc.)
I felt like I’ve needed more than just the 400 Q guide tbh
.
IB Vine - includes 400Qs plus off-guide questions. Also includes questions for PE, FIG, RX
It’s good for quizzing yourself, but I feel the Biws individual guides are actually helpful. And it’s not a textbook either
IB Vine already includes most, if not all, the technicals from 400 Qs for both basic and advanced. But if you're looking for strictly a PDF file, BIWS section-specific guides and Red Book should keep you busy for quite a while. Also guides from target schools
If you're a finance major and are taking finance valuation classes (basic LBO, DCF, etc) and at least 2 semesters of accounting by the time recruiting hits, you might be okay with the 400 + just googling technicals + any other free guides you can find online.
R&P is great for an econ major but I think anyone who has already had a lot of hours spent learning finance is better off using that time for networking or perfecting behaviorals
Anyone have any good references for more advanced questions?
For example - in an interview (full-time position when I was in college) I got asked something like this:
“What shortcut method can you use to identify the optimal cost of debt where an acquisition yields exactly 0 EPS accretion?”
There had been a couple of questions before testing whether I understood high level merger math (calculating approx. EPS based on an all-stock deal, knowing when you can use the P/E rule etc.)
I then got asked the above. I clarified whether it was all-stock or there was cash involved, to which they said it would not matter regardless of the funding split.
Can’t remember my exact thought process leading up to the answer, but I said something along the lines of:
“If this were all-stock, you would ensure the P/E of the bidder were to match the P/E of the target to result in no accretion / dilution. Also note that the inverse of the P/E (i.e. the reciprocal; the earnings yield) is a measure for the cost of equity. To ensure nil accretion, you would set the cost of debt to this level of cost of equity.”
I may have explained slightly incorrectly, but according to the interviewers that was the correct answer. Anyone know techs of that level which require a bit more thinking from the original guide questions?
Bump
Quae quasi totam ad repellendus pariatur. Est at odit voluptatibus debitis officiis quia aliquam. Qui laudantium perferendis dicta voluptates fuga doloremque. Voluptatem incidunt quasi reprehenderit fugiat. Voluptatem qui accusamus et quod quo ratione.
Veritatis ullam illum qui magnam qui et aut. Doloremque iure itaque voluptas numquam alias ut. Sunt et nulla neque.
Aut eos et provident sapiente totam. Ea totam asperiores reiciendis excepturi rerum aperiam aspernatur. Asperiores ut sed voluptates quos libero accusantium officia. Nam aut voluptatem tenetur odio commodi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...