Good article on FiveThirtyEight:
If you want a sense of what it was that forced the NBA to alter the way it schedules games, take a close look at a one-week stretch in mid-March.On March 11, the Golden State Warriors and San Antonio Spurs — separated in the standings by a mere game-and-a-half — each sat out their best players during a nationally televised Saturday game on ABC. A week later, the Cleveland Cavaliers did the exact same thing, sitting LeBron James among others in a marquee, ABC-carried game against the Los Angeles Clippers.1
Asked whether the league contacted the Cavs about the team’s decision to rest its stars during the contest, David Griffin, Cleveland’s general manager at the time, said an NBA official called him almost immediately. “Seven minutes after it was announced. Yeah, they were not happy,” he said. “I feel bad for the league. I really do. But it is what it is from an injury standpoint.”In response to such concerns — including the fact that NBA teams have begun resting players earlier and earlier in the calendar each season, even when they aren’t in contention — the league made sure to build in a decent number of rest days around its biggest, most-hyped games this season to prevent clubs from using that rationale to sit star players in those contests.
Perhaps the clearest shift in this regard: The league did its best to ensure that ABC will not be left showing the Warriors without Steph Curry, Kevin Durant or the Dubs’ other stars. Golden State, the NBA’s most televised team2, played five games on ABC last season, with four of those matchups being part of a back-to-back set.3 But this year, Golden State is slated to play six games on ABC with none of those being part of a back-to-back.
More broadly, league officials were able to reduce each club’s number of back-to-back showings by beginning the season a week earlier than usual. The average team will now play just over 14 back-to-backs over the course of the season, down from 16 last season. And for the first time in league history, no team will be forced to play four games in a five-night span.
Over the past few years, the notion of resting players has almost become commonplace, even after the Spurs got hit with a massive $250,000 fine in 2012 for holding out a number of its best players in a high-profile game against LeBron James and the Miami Heat. But there is an argument to be made that the league was overstepping its bounds in that case. After all, what if a team runs out of gas in the postseason, largely because it overexerted itself during a regular season in which players were all but forced to play in high-profile, nationally televised games? Aside from the injury risk, it’s also taking a key coaching decision — when and how to push your players, versus when to relax them — out of a coach’s hands.
By striking the balance it did Monday night, the league may have found a way to keep players more happy, and fans at home more interested.
Opinions?
It's a good start. I still think the issue is 82 games is far too many for a season. Reduce the schedule to 70 games though and have no back to backs and all the sudden you'll see stars never sit, less injuries, and all in all a much higher level of play consistently.
At accusantium unde blanditiis quam sapiente odio. Aut eos iure eos ut unde eum fugit. Sunt maiores itaque nulla at. Nobis praesentium nulla rerum aut est voluptatum asperiores. Asperiores doloremque molestiae sapiente sit rerum ea veritatis quis.
Voluptatem et hic delectus molestias quod nihil. Ut totam quos doloremque deleniti eos est. Soluta odio unde cum nisi labore occaecati commodi enim.
Voluptatum quidem est ea accusamus officiis perferendis distinctio in. Non nulla sed nulla nam dolore. Dicta quam itaque facilis delectus. Dignissimos delectus tenetur ut vel aut sit dolor.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...