The shrinking MBS market

The supply of mortgage-backed securities (MBS) continues to fall behind the potential demand - even with the Fed's taper in place. New issuance has steadily declined over the past year, with the Fed becoming an increasingly larger proportion of that market.

MBS.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">MBS.png" />
Source: SIFMA

Mortgage Daily: - For nine straight months, agency issuance of mortgage-backed securities has moved lower -- though there was an uptick at the Government National Mortgage Association. Securitization volume now stands at its lowest level in more than two-and-a-half years.

Combined issuance of fixed-rate MBS at the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. and Ginnie Mae totaled 7 percent less in January than in December.

Securitizations have been lower each month since April 2013, has fallen by more than half compared to January 2013 and was the lowest since July 2011.

At the same time the Fed is to continue purchasing large amounts of this paper through the end of the year, albeit at a slower pace.

Some of the decline in new issuance has been due to the drop in mortgage refinancing - old securities don't amortize as quickly and fewer new securities are issued. But part of the reason for the lower volume of these securities remains the supply of mortgage loans. The total mortgage debt outstanding is barely growing - with a great deal of that growth coming from multi-family residence (apartment) financing.

Source: FRB

As a consequence, MBS paper outstanding has been shrinking since the peak reached back in 2007.

Source: SIFMA (includes CMBS)

Some of that of course is due to the collapse in private label MBS market, including sub-prime. But the amount of agency (government-backed) MBS has not grown much either.

While some would say that $9 trillion of MBS paper should be sufficient, one has to keep in mind that the US and the global economy is now substantially larger than it was in 2007. MBS, particularly agency bonds, are becoming a smaller portion of the overall capital markets, worsening the shortage of higher quality bonds (see story). Liquidity in that market has also suffered, with average daily trading volumes at the lowest levels in nearly a decade (see chart). These are some of the reasons the Fed should return the MBS market to the private sector by exiting its purchases as soon as possible.

 

I think this may be less of a problem going forward as the Fed will crowd out the private sector less and less due to tapering and consumers will probably increase their purchases of homes now that they are adequately deleveraged, the economy picks up further, and credit eases even more. Also, remember, a large percentage of the new issuance in the MBS market was due to refinancing and not actual brand new mortgages in the traditional sense.

The biggest elephant in the room however is what will happen to the MBS market when Congress starts to scale down Fannie and Freddie. The vast majority of new mortgages are guaranteed by these entities and I dont think the private label market will be able to pick up the share, especially since investors may still be wary of MBS without an implicit gov't guarantee post-crisis. This will dry up liquidity, drive up mortgage rates, and may lead to another drop in housing. I think there's a lot of uncertainty in the MBS market going forward and is in my opinion one of the biggest headwinds in the US economy going forward along with pensions and municipal debt.

 

Vero maxime in impedit et quos enim et. Maxime quis corporis velit ex possimus. Fugiat asperiores officia est eos et in explicabo. Quas illum et nesciunt beatae adipisci. Aspernatur placeat cupiditate nemo.

Sed ut placeat quo. Dicta ipsam dolores nam quo est. Ea et ut tempora rerum autem.

Sunt quasi et accusantium et ut quia in fugiat. Autem dolor magnam quo voluptas. Qui voluptate rerum ratione dolor corrupti. Aliquid facere suscipit ipsam atque consectetur nihil. Nulla est totam sit sapiente delectus modi.

Harum qui laboriosam ut eius consequatur rem. Cum eum in deserunt.

Under my tutelage, you will grow from boys to men. From men into gladiators. And from gladiators into SWANSONS.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”