The shrinking MBS market
The supply of mortgage-backed securities (MBS) continues to fall behind the potential demand - even with the Fed's taper in place. New issuance has steadily declined over the past year, with the Fed becoming an increasingly larger proportion of that market.
MBS.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">MBS.png" /> |
Source: SIFMA |
Mortgage Daily: - For nine straight months, agency issuance of mortgage-backed securities has moved lower -- though there was an uptick at the Government National Mortgage Association. Securitization volume now stands at its lowest level in more than two-and-a-half years.
Combined issuance of fixed-rate MBS at the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. and Ginnie Mae totaled 7 percent less in January than in December.
Securitizations have been lower each month since April 2013, has fallen by more than half compared to January 2013 and was the lowest since July 2011.
At the same time the Fed is to continue purchasing large amounts of this paper through the end of the year, albeit at a slower pace.
Some of the decline in new issuance has been due to the drop in mortgage refinancing - old securities don't amortize as quickly and fewer new securities are issued. But part of the reason for the lower volume of these securities remains the supply of mortgage loans. The total mortgage debt outstanding is barely growing - with a great deal of that growth coming from multi-family residence (apartment) financing.
Source: FRB |
As a consequence, MBS paper outstanding has been shrinking since the peak reached back in 2007.
Source: SIFMA (includes CMBS) |
Some of that of course is due to the collapse in private label MBS market, including sub-prime. But the amount of agency (government-backed) MBS has not grown much either.
While some would say that $9 trillion of MBS paper should be sufficient, one has to keep in mind that the US and the global economy is now substantially larger than it was in 2007. MBS, particularly agency bonds, are becoming a smaller portion of the overall capital markets, worsening the shortage of higher quality bonds (see story). Liquidity in that market has also suffered, with average daily trading volumes at the lowest levels in nearly a decade (see chart). These are some of the reasons the Fed should return the MBS market to the private sector by exiting its purchases as soon as possible.
I think this may be less of a problem going forward as the Fed will crowd out the private sector less and less due to tapering and consumers will probably increase their purchases of homes now that they are adequately deleveraged, the economy picks up further, and credit eases even more. Also, remember, a large percentage of the new issuance in the MBS market was due to refinancing and not actual brand new mortgages in the traditional sense.
The biggest elephant in the room however is what will happen to the MBS market when Congress starts to scale down Fannie and Freddie. The vast majority of new mortgages are guaranteed by these entities and I dont think the private label market will be able to pick up the share, especially since investors may still be wary of MBS without an implicit gov't guarantee post-crisis. This will dry up liquidity, drive up mortgage rates, and may lead to another drop in housing. I think there's a lot of uncertainty in the MBS market going forward and is in my opinion one of the biggest headwinds in the US economy going forward along with pensions and municipal debt.
Downgrade effects on repo and MBS markets (Originally Posted: 08/06/2011)
Any traders or fixed income research guys that could provide some color on the following:
Possible effects on the repo market where agency RMBS are used as collateral. Interested in 30/60/90 day repos, not overnight. Any thoughts on this? Do you expect an increase in cost? Do you think haircuts will stay the same?
Impact on MBS spreads (CMBS, agency and highly rated non-agency RMBS). How many bps of widening do you expect?
Anything else that would affect the MBS market and short-term borrowing costs?
These are just some questions I will be bothering my own MBS research and trading teams with on Monday. Would like to be prepared with something specific so I don't waste their time.
Haircuts could increase ~5%, with 10-20 bp spread widening in MBS space. This was mentioned in a recent JPM mortgage research piece (though not specifically because of downgrade), but still relevant.
Vero maxime in impedit et quos enim et. Maxime quis corporis velit ex possimus. Fugiat asperiores officia est eos et in explicabo. Quas illum et nesciunt beatae adipisci. Aspernatur placeat cupiditate nemo.
Sed ut placeat quo. Dicta ipsam dolores nam quo est. Ea et ut tempora rerum autem.
Sunt quasi et accusantium et ut quia in fugiat. Autem dolor magnam quo voluptas. Qui voluptate rerum ratione dolor corrupti. Aliquid facere suscipit ipsam atque consectetur nihil. Nulla est totam sit sapiente delectus modi.
Harum qui laboriosam ut eius consequatur rem. Cum eum in deserunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...