Think I'm about to get the axe. Help?
I'm a first year analyst at a BB bank, and we were called to discuss current economic matters. I gave a suggestion in the meeting that I thought could make the bank a shit-ton of cash, so I put it forward. I've received several emails from MDs that indicate a general displeasure with my idea, as if it could be considered distasteful just to give a recommendation.
I think I'm in real fucking trouble. Advice? What do I do? This is the first time I've been at risk of failing at anything.
Truth is, I think it was a fine fucking idea, and if my bank doesn't pursue it, another one will and will make a ton of cash.
Advice? I'm really really really scared.
What did they say was wrong with your suggestion?
My suggestion was that, for $25,000, we sell the "analyst experience", or at least the external benefits of it. For a nominal fee, we allow people to list on their resume that they had two years of investment banking experience, claiming top bonus, and if called on a reference-check, we promise only to say positive things about them.
Let's face it: there are going to be a lot of laid-off bankers coming out onto the streets during the fall of 2007, and they're all going to be mighty irked about their 6-12 month setbacks on the path to PE or MBA glory. We'd basically be printing money by selling them the opportunity to pave over their career potholes, with no cost to us.
The idea's fucking brilliant, but it didn't go over very well... :( One of the emails described the "joke", which it wasn't, as "unprofessional to the highest degree". I think I'm utterly fucked.
Perhaps I just didn't present the idea clearly, but I'm not a fucking consultant and so it's not my job to make PowerPoints. I prefer to say what I have to say and move on.
Any bank that would fire you for putting forth a well-intentioned idea after having explicitly solicited this sort of advice is a bullshit bank that you're better off not working at.
However, I seriously doubt that you'd get fired for your suggestion.
I take that back - I hadn't seen your post describing the idea. What you said is retarded, and you may well get canned.
That's unethical as hell. I am surprised that you are surprised at the response.
Hahaha this is hilariously fake.
That or you're pretty much fired.
Haha the more I think about it, the more I'm surprised they didn't fire you already. Seriously ethics are a huge deal, you don't fuck around about that stuff in any business, let alone Wall Street.
LOL
Something this ridiculous can only be fake. If not, best of luck to you. If you don't get fired, you can at least say goodbye to top bonus. That's for damn sure.
I'm not so sure - I'd bet that another BB would be willing to sell him 2 years of IB experience with top bonus. Of course, if he wants GS on his resume then he'll have to pay up, like $30K, since they are a classier firm.
That may not be worth a firing, but it is definitely a horrible idea...and if I were your MD, I'd be watching you very closely to wait for you to slip up.
How did you even get a job in the first place if you think an idea like this is "fucking brilliant"?
The more I think about it, the more this must be a joke. That kind of idea proposed in good faith can only be the work of a deranged mind.
The idea I proposed is not that unethical. Consider and compare the following two transactions.
Person works for a bank for two years, producing work worth, say, $400k. (Let's be really generous.) He's paid $250k all-in over those two years, and support costs, office space, recruiting, and miscellaneous add up to $135k. The bank's margin is a pathetic $15k over two years. I'm making these numbers up, but they seem about right. The volatility here is very high, as well, since the person might be a total non-producer and a huge loss to the bank. Bank's up about $15k, with high variance, while the analyst walks away with two years' experience and the ability to claim a high bonus.
He pays the bank $25k (compare this to $15k, above) and gets all the benefits of analyst experience on his resume. The bank loses nothing and assumes no risk. If he's dedicated to finance, he can read some relevant books during his two years of being "off" from the burden of having to worry about his resume. Or, he can take an entirely different job and do that for two years, still having the same opportunities as a bona fide analyst at the end of it. He can travel. Et cetera.
Scenario 2 is better both for the "analyst", and also better for the bank.
As for "you can at least say goodbye to top bonus", I'm honestly not worried. A few thousand dollars is not significant for me, and when I apply for jobs I'll claim (of course) top bonus anyway, since that's what everyone does.
but in your senario 2, the bank is pretty much lying that someone worked there and got top bonus.
this has to be a joke.
This is fake. My bet is that it's this guy flaminary under a different name.
If not, you deserve to be fired for being such a moron.
Yes, but regarding scenario #2, banks always lie about bonuses they give analysts. If you say you got top bonus, the bank will support you even if you didn't. It (1) helps the analyst get a good job, but also (2) makes the bank look good to be so generous, and (3) benefits the bank in the long-term for the analyst to do well.
I don't dislike this form of "lying", because it will benefit me, and because it makes employment markets more efficient. I just thought I'd recommend taking it a full step further. Fact is, some bank is going to print a shitload of easy money by selling work experience for a fucking mint. Why not be on the bleeding edge?
I assume this is a joke. But, just in case it's not, what happens when this individual who has 2-years IB 'experience' can't do a damn thing your reference says he can at the place where he just got hired. I'm sure that's going to come across real well for your bank's reputation.
Most analysts at investment banks learn about as much under the current system as they would under my plan. Really, Excel hot-keys can be learned within a day or two. None of the skills learned in IBD couldn't be picked up in a weekend crash course, and we'd offer that, for an additional $8k or so. I wouldn't have put the idea forth if I hadn't figured the shit out.
The "analyst" under my plan would actually get to travel, or work dead-end but interesting blue-collar jobs, or perhaps try to write a novel. He'd come out of this being a much more interesting person than most analysts, and therefore hit harder and farther with clients.
Yep this is flaminary
OP doesn't work at any bank
It's only inflaminary because the idea is so new. The bleeding edge is always controversial.
I highly doubt anyone would suggest this kind of ludicrous idea. You realize how easy it would be for someone to expose this scheme ??
Noone is idiotic enough to suggest this idea, but if this is Flaminary....I gotta give you props for making this board a whole lot more interesting !
Clearly fake
Noone who busted his or hers ass to get an analyst position would make such an idiotic suggestion.
Additionally, even if I think I have a novel idea, I keep my suggestions to myself.
Analysts are to be seen, not heard.
Correction: Analysts are not be seen, nor heard.
Analysts should all be Milford men
Ban the OP.
And their other nick.
And their IP.
this is dumb
Kudos, if you actually suggested this, either you have big balls or you are seriously stupid!
If the latter, only an IB rookie analyst would do something like this, I love your earlier analysis by the way you try to economically rationalise your idea!
"He pays the bank $25k (compare this to $15k, above) and gets all the benefits of analyst experience on his resume. The bank loses nothing and assumes no risk"
LOL I can't believe it you have to be joking! No risk! What if it gets leaked to the press that a BB is selling its name to appear on some 24 year olds resume! Not only will it completely ruin the reputation of the firm and the firm's employees(ever heard of intrinsic value?) but also of all future employees! How many of you IBankers would be willing to do 100+ a week hours then when you can just pay $20 000 (or whatever) for it! The main reason people are willing to work such crazy hours as an analyst is because of the bank's brand stamp on your butt (in the long run $100 000 salary means shit). I mean surely you understand the concepts of supply and demand?
How the hell did you ever get into this industry anyway have you ever heard of ethics or were you masturbating over Gordan Gekko in that lecture?
PS. why don't you start your own firm Goldman Shacks (a la JT Marlin) and sell your name so that everyone can put it on their resume? You'll make a "ton of cash"! I'll even do the economics, pay a secretary $30 000 a year to answer phones and verify references, if only two people sign up, you will be making $20 000 before taxes and oppurtunity time lost in jail! If you sign 100, you will be making more than all the people in your meeting! It can't fail!
this is fake - no one is that stupid...
however if you are that stupid and somehow tricked the BB during interviews that you were smarter than you have shown here, then you should be as good as fired...
While this post may or may not be a joke, the OP does indirectly bring up one good point - why the hell are banks getting away with supporting analysts' false claims of getting the very top bonuses and deals? What if the bottom of the barrel analysts are exposed by their future PE employers as clearly not top bucket - doesn't this also risk trashing the bank's reputation, just as this scheme would!?
But yeah, I think this idea is pretty retarded, joke or not. I think banks get more out of their IB analysts than just what they pay them - all the pitchbooks, models, and comps that analysts do contribute to all the deals the banks wins, which yield millions and millions of profits in return. For 25k, which is absolutely nothing to a BB bank, they get nothing other than some pocket money, but risk their entire image of business integrity and ethical responsibility if even of these cases were exposed.
They actually aren't. What really happens is that they try to avoid disclosing compensation at all. An MD will be like, person x is strong, person y is strong, etc. Call the staffer, though (or even other analysts) and they will verify. Also, the PE firms are not stupid. They will probably ask a few other questions, then ask about comp (and not be like, “this person claimed to be top, is this true?â€) to really lead the person to answer, “O middle, but they were close!â€â€¦or…â€They were totally robbed!†These guys have been trying to weed out the best for a long time, and they are pretty good at it.
Additionally, the real value in being a top analyst is that officers will actually give a few names to friends in PE who are hiring. And guess what? They give them the top analysts. These PE firms are often their clients, so they do have an incentive to deliver the best.
The real people who have screwed this process up are the PE firms themselves. Since many of them have started recruiting well before comp even comes out, its to early to have a really measure. They can get soft descriptions from making calls, but they do not have an objective measure. Regardless, bonuses are not the end all and be all of skill anyway, and I would bet you that good PE firms are getting significantly above average IB analysts.
This is brilliant!!!! Can't beleive anyone hasn't thought of this before. I am going to approach Harvard BS to see if I can just buy the whole MBA experience rather than going to all the bother of actually attending.
Thanks for the tip!!
what a fuckin moron. A waste of internet bandwidth.
Why stop there?!? Why don't we do this for the bar and for Med School... Original Poster, congrats, you're the dumbest person I've ever heard of.
Sit laboriosam in asperiores aut quia. Sed placeat quasi pariatur quisquam. Accusamus optio magni ut porro quis optio. Veniam pariatur tenetur qui eum. Omnis vel qui quis incidunt. Vitae quas et et minus facilis numquam magni omnis.
Minus temporibus consequatur ducimus qui asperiores aut. Qui voluptatem officiis reiciendis autem dolorem aut eveniet. Tenetur nemo ea animi et aut nisi aut id. Repellat id libero et iure. Omnis dolor cum aut nulla.
Autem ex quas rerum consectetur dicta nulla quam. Ullam et accusantium voluptatum ipsam et facere et dolorem. Perferendis eos omnis enim repellendus qui voluptatem commodi. Sed sapiente quis reiciendis nesciunt. Repellat et rerum sit aut quasi illum impedit. Reprehenderit ut vitae fugit esse voluptatem nemo repellat.
Rem odio sint quia expedita reprehenderit ducimus. Voluptatem aut aut facere totam eum. Facere numquam iure et rerum. Architecto eaque harum autem. Debitis repellat vel dolores nisi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Et vel tenetur omnis voluptatum nam possimus. Vel voluptatibus et nesciunt omnis fuga molestias dolorum. Quos minus consectetur iusto minus maiores dolor reprehenderit pariatur.