Thoughts on these 2 watches

I'm planning to replace my current watch with a piece from Baume and Mercier. They are the only watches that I like and the Classima collection is just what I'm looking for.

I've narrowed it down to 2 watches...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icb1JlX3aJk

 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

B&M is a great brand. Taking a look at both watches, they are both nice - if you've tried them both on and still can't decide, I like the 1st one a bit better than the 2nd - just in terms of simplicity while maintaining elegance. Again, both are nice watches - if you haven't tried them both on, then do so first.

 

How can Baume & Mercier be the only brand you like? Every one of their models is a rip-off of a watch from a genuinely reputable, high-end maker--which they themselves are most certainly not. The two you've linked are blatantly reminiscent of the Villeret series from Blancpain. The first is pretty atrocious, honestly. It exposes part of the balance wheel through the dial, which is a cheesy attempt to mimic an exposed tourbillion complication on watches that typically run over $60k. It's like installing a hood with a glass opening on your Camry to show-off the engine because you saw the same thing done in a Ferrari or Lamborghini. Nobody wants to see your plastic-encased inline-4, whose only technical merit is that it gets 31 mpg, and nobody wants to see the roughly-finished balance wheel of a mass-produced ebauche, designed for ease of manufacture, not beauty.

It's a pretty good rule of thumb the only mechanical watches worth buying are under $300 and over $3,000. Everything in between tends to be a waste since they use the same stock ETA movements. When you buy a Baume & Mercier, you're paying a $1000 premium for faux prestige that's been incubated exclusively in suburban shopping malls.

Sorry if I'm being brutally harsh: I'm just trying really hard to prevent you from getting either of these watches. Either would be a real waste. If you want a simple, tasteful, far more honest dress watch with a mechanical movement, take a look at the Seiko Spirit. It goes for about $300 and is substantively superior.

 
Best Response
jd-to-ib:
How can Baume & Mercier be the only brand you like? Every one of their models is a rip-off of a watch from a genuinely reputable, high-end maker--which they themselves are most certainly not. The two you've linked are blatantly reminiscent of the Villeret series from Blancpain. The first is pretty atrocious, honestly. It exposes part of the balance wheel through the dial, which is a cheesy attempt to mimic an exposed tourbillion complication on watches that typically run over $60k. It's like installing a hood with a glass opening on your Camry to show-off the engine because you saw the same thing done in a Ferrari or Lamborghini. Nobody wants to see your plastic-encased inline-4, whose only technical merit is that it gets 31 mpg, and nobody wants to see the roughly-finished balance wheel of a mass-produced ebauche, designed for ease of manufacture, not beauty.

It's a pretty good rule of thumb the only mechanical watches worth buying are under $300 and over $3,000. Everything in between tends to be a waste since they use the same stock ETA movements. When you buy a Baume & Mercier, you're paying a $1000 premium for faux prestige that's been incubated exclusively in suburban shopping malls.

Sorry if I'm being brutally harsh: I'm just trying really hard to prevent you from getting either of these watches. Either would be a real waste. If you want a simple, tasteful, far more honest dress watch with a mechanical movement, take a look at the Seiko Spirit. It goes for about $300 and is substantively superior.

This man here knows precisely what hes talking about.

Go In-House or GTFO

 

Seriously there are only two watches that are really reputable -- Rolex and Omega, maybe Tag and Torneau if you want to go lower on the pole. Why settle when you can get the best? You can get a Rolex for under that 10k price

 
ricochetX:
Seriously there are only two watches that are really reputable -- Rolex and Omega, maybe Tag and Torneau if you want to go lower on the pole. Why settle when you can get the best? You can get a Rolex for under that 10k price

This is silly. Rolex and Omega both make respectable sporty watches, but they are pretty low on the totem pole of fine watchmaking. Now, I'm no Rolex hater--I like the Explorer I and the Submariner--but few things are more repugnant to me than a gold Datejust decked out in diamonds. It's no different from a souped up Dodge Durango with chromed rims.

Tourneau is a watch retailer. They don't make their own watches; they subcontract production and then slap their name on. The watches are unremarkable and, while I'm not into brand projecting to begin with, I have no idea why anyone would want to show-off that he got his watch from the Best Buy of fine timepieces.

Tag is little better than Baume & Mercier. All ETA ebauches, unmodified, with a premium tacked on for suburban mall-incubated faux prestige. The upside is that they have some legitimately semi-classic models, like the Monaco. Too bad they are so overpriced and materially pedestrian.

In the $3,000 to $100,000 range, there are countless options to consider: IWC, Jaeger LeCoultre, A. Lange, Patek, Audemars Piguet, Vacheron, etc. And those are just a handful of the major 'manufactures' (firms that make their own movements). There are also all the boutique makers to look at, like F.P. Journe and Richard Mille. Ignore rankings at this level--it really comes down to personal taste.

If you want to spend around $3,000 and you want a classic dress watch, take a look at a steel Jaeger LeCoultre Master Control or Reverso. Impeccably classic, and a giant bang for the buck.

 
jd-to-ib:
ricochetX:
Seriously there are only two watches that are really reputable -- Rolex and Omega, maybe Tag and Torneau if you want to go lower on the pole. Why settle when you can get the best? You can get a Rolex for under that 10k price

This is silly. Rolex and Omega both make respectable sporty watches, but they are pretty low on the totem pole of fine watchmaking. Now, I'm no Rolex hater--I like the Explorer I and the Submariner--but few things are more repugnant to me than a gold Datejust decked out in diamonds. It's no different from a souped up Dodge Durango with chromed rims.

Tourneau is a watch retailer. They don't make their own watches; they subcontract production and then slap their name on. The watches are unremarkable and, while I'm not into brand projecting to begin with, I have no idea why anyone would want to show-off that he got his watch from the Best Buy of fine timepieces.

Tag is little better than Baume & Mercier. All ETA ebauches, unmodified, with a premium tacked on for suburban mall-incubated faux prestige. The upside is that they have some legitimately semi-classic models, like the Monaco. Too bad they are so overpriced and materially pedestrian.

In the $3,000 to $100,000 range, there are countless options to consider: IWC, Jaeger LeCoultre, A. Lange, Patek, Audemars Piguet, Vacheron, etc. And those are just a handful of the major 'manufactures' (firms that make their own movements). There are also all the boutique makers to look at, like F.P. Journe and Richard Mille. Ignore rankings at this level--it really comes down to personal taste.

If you want to spend around $3,000 and you want a classic dress watch, take a look at a steel Jaeger LeCoultre Master Control or Reverso. Impeccably classic, and a giant bang for the buck.

Hahaha jd, you beat me to it. Rolex and Omega are very mainstream names people that those who don't know watches would think of first as quality watch brands. But those who are appreciative/know watches also know the brands jd mentioned above, along with quite a few other names.

 

Alias sit nulla dolorem voluptatem. Dicta temporibus laborum non eos quibusdam aliquam. Accusamus et officiis iste consequatur.

Sed occaecati ut culpa odit voluptatem sunt. Ullam quisquam itaque quis odio modi nobis. Impedit quibusdam ipsa odio omnis hic ipsum quia distinctio. Modi enim perspiciatis hic nulla. Molestiae est reiciendis libero vel dolor. Autem consequuntur dolores aut iste. Iste maxime alias vero.

Est rerum qui est itaque voluptatem aperiam qui. Optio sunt neque exercitationem explicabo.

Ut nemo unde nulla. Aut saepe ea veniam non ratione impedit. Ipsum vel exercitationem sint ipsum dolorem fuga unde.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”