Title downgrade

Im looking to move from a no name boutique to a BB. I've got 8 years experience at this boutique and am a first year VP.


I got an offer at BB but they let me choose to be VP immediately or Sr. Associate and VP in a year. The MD hiring me highly recommended the second option, saying I should take a year to learn since at my current firm we do micro/middle market and barely any auctions. I appreciate that he is letting me choose. Many things at a BB we don't even do (like management presentations or even many pitchbooks). Pay is great with either title. What would you do?

 
Most Helpful

Junior to where you are currently at, but I was in a similar situation when I was transferring firms. Had spent some time as an analyst at one firm, transitioned to another as a senior analyst, and then was in the process of receiving an offer from a BB (chose another firm in the end). One of my conversations with the head of the group had the same advice - given option of coming in a 2nd/3rd year analyst or as an associate - and he said go with the former. 

Obviously responsibilities for the positions I was considered for versus yours are different, but he told me coming in at a higher level would have increased expectations, and by coming in, getting my feet wet first, it would allow me to grow into that role more naturally without the pressure. 

 

Perhaps this might not always be reflective of whats "best for you" but what the hiring manager can get away with in the hiring dynamics? Maybe some managers would prefer to squeeze an extra year out of their hires before having to move them up to VP or just keep them hungry for a little longer before they start looking for their next move?

I once had an MD of a prop desk brag to me how they get internal laterals to accept not one but two year demotions (effectively starting as analyst 1 all over again) as a sign of how popular the MD's team was within the bank.

 

Picking the latter option will give you a year to build goodwill with the group and learn the ropes of the things the BB does that you aren't familiar with.  See if you can negotiate a higher bonus for your step-back year and be vocal about expecting the promotion at the end of the year.

Also something people don't consider but you may not be in banking all the way to the MD level, so this gives you another year of banking income that you might not otherwise get.

 

As someone who had to come in as a 1st year analyst again after doing a year at a no name boutique (didn't move to BB, just MM upstream), I'd take the MD's rec. It's a cliche phrase in the industry, but I'm a proponent of the "underpromise, overdeliver" concept. It might just be personal philosophy, but I think exceeding expectations right off the bat and having some more leeway to learn freely will help in the long run - though also depends on how long you see yourself at the firm. If long-term, I'd for sure take the MD's rec.

 

What an easy decision, number 2 obviously sets you up for success. And oh yea, your future boss already told you what he thinks is the intelligent decision. And yet you’re actually considering disregarding the first piece of advice he gives you?

 

Lol do you know how this business works? There's no guarantee or frankly solid likelihood he becomes an MD and starts bringing in clients. The latter option gives him an extra year of banking income which at that level, sticking around to collect as many bonus checks as possible is really all that matters. This has nothing to do with "risk averse" or betting on yourself. It's fucking banking. Betting on yourself is making enough to gfto as quickly as possible from the corp world. 

 

If that's your approach you're literally the definition of "risk averse"

 

I'd go with his recommendation because going with the first option (VP) is a lose/lose outcome situation. On the one hand, if you underperform you fuck yourself and on the other hand if you over perform you spite the MD. I know it's unfair, but it takes a magnanimous person to really wish success for others even if they're proven wrong and banking doesn't have the highest population of magnanimous people :) 

So take the SA role, but get it firmly committed that VP is in one year. 

“Self-control is strength. Right thought is mastery. Calmness is power. ” - James Allen
 

I had a similar situation where they were considering bringing me on as an associate but suggested it would be better to come as a senior analyst (I was already an associate in another area of the bank). The biggest argument for downgrading is you will be benchmarked/ranked against those at your level. So you might get a mid or low ranking as VP but a high ranking as senior associate. For me, I wasn’t willing to take the cut and said peace.
 

Who knows, you may be ready to jump ship in two years. You’d land a much better spot with two years of VP on your resume vs having just made VP. Turnover is so high on Wall Street, I think it’s overrated to worry too much about the goodwill as much of the team may be gone in two years. If they’re giving you the option for VO, you’re obviously qualified. I’d take VP

 

I'm going to say take the MD's advice. I see it as the VP wanting to set you up to succeed. Success takes time and he's saying learn how we do it and run with it. On average, it takes between 3 and 6 months to settle into a new job. Obviously, you can do the work, but it gives you a chance to learn how your BB does things without as much stress as being a VP. While I don't see taking the VP role as a lose/lose situation off the bat, I do see it as the harder option because you're expected to learn the role, pick up skills you don't have, and start to bring in business all in one fell swoop. If you kick ass, fantastic! If you fail, that's going to be a strike against you. Just keep that in mind. 

 
Frieds

I'm going to say take the MD's advice. I see it as the VP wanting to set you up to succeed. Success takes time and he's saying learn how we do it and run with it. On average, it takes between 3 and 6 months to settle into a new job. Obviously, you can do the work, but it gives you a chance to learn how your BB does things without as much stress as being a VP. While I don't see taking the VP role as a lose/lose situation off the bat, I do see it as the harder option because you're expected to learn the role, pick up skills you don't have, and start to bring in business all in one fell swoop. If you kick ass, fantastic! If you fail, that's going to be a strike against you. Just keep that in mind. 

The fact that the MD is pushing for this says a lot of course but OP has 8 years of IB experience and is suggested to take a voluntary downgrade to a 3rd year associate position (so similar to associates with maybe 4-5 years experience) to he can have more room to succeed? It's not like OP would be expected to bring a book of business as a first year VP lateraling from a more established bank.

Personally, unless I felt completely out of my comfort zone (very different industry group or products suite?), I would take the VP title. If the job doesn't work out, you're a VP rather than a senior associate in your 10th year of banking.

 

If you read what the OP said, he's not coming in from another BB, he's coming in from a no-name bank that caters to micro and really tiny lower-middle markets clients. He pointed out that he lacks experience in certain areas. He outright said that there are things his current shop does not do that he's expected to do. I think that weighs more on the decision than anything else. If he was moving from an Upper Middle Markets Shop, sure, take the title, however, I think the longer-term success is more important than getting the title a year early. 

 

MD is just trying to maintain his dominance by keeping everyone else down. Don’t let him win. Tell him you’re coming for him. Take the VP job. Overtake the MDs position. Eat his lunch. Bang his wife

 

Voluptate culpa qui aut aliquam ut. Voluptates cupiditate sunt optio labore. Accusamus qui rerum odit itaque modi. Placeat reprehenderit officiis amet veritatis.

Et labore dolores eos delectus excepturi doloremque ipsa optio. Sed officiis magni natus quia iure unde.

Vel magnam repellendus distinctio modi vitae debitis dolore. Consequatur aspernatur quisquam eum ut harum ex dicta. Earum maiores deleniti distinctio dolores aut. Dolore neque earum nihil omnis est.

Voluptatem nihil ut corporis aut. Et repellendus et ut nobis. Pariatur adipisci aliquid quisquam ad rerum. Aut quo pariatur rem tenetur.

 

Quo consectetur omnis et ab et doloremque ratione. Cumque odio veniam sed aut earum optio ullam est. Impedit eos hic quam nemo qui et dolores dignissimos. Perferendis aut dolore et quasi esse. Quo voluptatem ex quas expedita dolor voluptatum.

Fuga libero libero et ipsam. Veniam doloremque omnis error aut qui corporis. Vel numquam distinctio aspernatur aut dolor.

Voluptas at deleniti illo hic. Aut odit esse voluptate quisquam et quia.

Totam cupiditate ut earum praesentium. Quis et minima explicabo voluptas doloremque aliquam saepe. Nobis quasi fuga harum voluptatem ab quod. Vel omnis labore reprehenderit dolore voluptates quos. Ab exercitationem aut natus soluta id.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”