To absolutely kill technical interviews
So I'm prepping for ft ib internships coming in the falls.
So far, I've read and I'm planning to skim again the WSO guides, 400Qs guide from M&I, and Vault.
I also have Investment Banking Valuation, LBO, M&A by Joshua Rosenbaum et al., which I have not started reading yet.
First of all: do I have enough resources to be able to answer 100% of technicals asked? If not, what else should I study?
Second, I need a routinized system to keep up with them. I currently have two part time internships to keep me busy throughout the day. I was thinking of putting aside half an hour to an hour every night and study more intensely on weekends. But I'm afraid I might forget them come closer to the interviews, if I start now.
So for those of you already in the industry, what was your strategy of keeping up with technicals leading up to the recruiting period?
Thanks.
But yes, if you know the M&I and WSO guides really well, you will be fine
Everything that will likely be asked for an entry-level analyst is probably in M&I/WSO, unless your interviewer really wants to fuck with you OR you come off as arrogant and they don't buy your shit. That said, M&I has a lot of "example"/"general" type questions that can be easily changed around. For example, a lot of the accounting questions in M&I's guide refers to specific line items (depr, COGS, etc.) You don't want to just be blindly memorizing sample questions and answers. In order to kill technical interviews, you need a perfect understanding of the basics. In general, if you have a rock-solid understanding of how everything works - financial statement analysis, valuation, corpfin/projectfin concepts - you can easily figure out many other things.
On a slightly unrelated note, how come no one recommends Heard on the Street anymore? Arguably it's better suited for more quantitative roles, but I found it to be good practice in case of curveball/brainteaser questions.
Is this more or less true at the Associate level too?
The reason why people don't recommend Heard on the Street as frequently as the other interview guides is basically within the reason that you gave for recommending it: it focuses on brainteasers and relatively more difficult quantitative questions that might help you differentiate the geniuses from the "normal" smart people, but then again, in IBD, you don't need to be ridiculously smart to succeed. While FT interviews may well include brainteasers, it's a foregone conclusion that they'll include some sort of finance/accounting questions, so I suppose that's why you don't see that guide recommended quite as often.
even if you read all of those I can still find a technical you can't answer. You really would have to read textbooks on everything. Not a basic summary like the rosenbaum book or interview guides.
And still, textbook knowledge won't be enough. You'll lack real world experience and research knowledge.
Couple of thoughts: 1.) Make networking by far your #1 priority. As okay24 mentioned, a banker will screw with you if he/she wants to and it is impossible to be prepared from every technical angle. Make sure you network hard to land the interview in the first place and earn positive reputations at the banks / dependable relationships. Virtually everything will hinge on that. If the banker likes you and the recruiting team has notes that you have done well in informational interviews, your real / superday interviews will go well with softball questions. Most people who get tough technical questions are the candidates whom bankers don't really like / know well.
2.) Make sure you don't memorize and regurgitate your answers. You should ideally be able to know the concepts so well that you can verbalize them in a simple / easy-going / smooth way. I hate it when people repeat answers / phrases from the guides verbatim as it is obvious and boring. Try to break it down into simple and summarized concepts...
3.) To really demonstrate your mastery - be able to weave in deals and existing issues. For example, if someone asks you about IPOs, you can define it but also relate it / comment / weave in factors regarding the Facebook IPO. I am fairly impressed it someone can answer a question and then find a relevant example. Anyone can define what "capital structure" is but a great answer would be the summary and - on top of that - an example of a company and that company's capital structure.
intermediate financial accounting 1&2 will prepare you more than enough
Studying guides at length and in depth will be hugely helpful, but the only way to "kill it" it to understand the stuff well. Make sure you have an understanding of the material that technical questions are asking about. As a couple people mentioned before, the standard questions can be flipped around to throw you for a loop. You may even hear some completely new ones out of left-field that the interviewer comes up with just to test whether you really understand the concepts behind the questions.
So basically, beyond the standard (i.e. how does depreciation flow through, etc.) focus more on developing an understanding of how everything works. You'll end up being much better prepared to think through tough questions when they get thrown at you.
This is awesome advice and I think you have the right attitude in mind; look at preparing for the technical aspect of IB interviews as an open book test and everything that you have/should have learned at the UG level [and some above] is fair game.
I've said this before and I'll say it again every time these 'prep' threads show up its fine to be prepared for all the questions you may be asked, hell even w/ some script as well, but also be prepared to back your answers. Having prepared answers though should be a no-brainer. If you can do this you're probably 50% better prepared than your peers, but you should take it to the next level and leave nothing on the table. You should actually practice what you're learning. Take the time to build a model or two, three or more and have that motherfucker 'break' on you and #ref on when you plug your ending cash back in the balance sheet from the statement of cash flows. I think there's some valuable experience in chasing down mistakes and it brings you to the 'next level'. You'll develop a familiarity and comfort with the financial statements that you wouldn't gain otherwise and won't be left sweating out a stupid debit/credit question that seems a bit foreign to you when you've been spending all of your time in LBO land. Building/breaking models pulls on all of the nitty-gritty details that you skip when you study a canned 5 line response to DCF, Acc/Dil., or LBO question.
Chances are, if you're not a dick, you won't get asked anything ridiculous, but you want to be prepared for that arrogant Associate fresh out of b-school that thinks he's the shit and drills you with something. I'd also hazard a guess that if you develop a comfort with financial modeling/interview questions it does loads for your confidence. Yes, it's important to toe the line and not be a snobby know-it-all, but it'll hurt even worse to look like a fool when an interviewer 'digs' into your knowledgebase and exposes your ass to get burnt.
So study like you are and throw in modeling and if you're weak recognize it and don't push the shit off. There's nothing wrong w/ coming home from two internships broke-the-fuck-off and tired and studying. Optimal? Probably not, but there's winners and losers and you don't want to be left standing outside the circle in November. Feels like shit.
I wouldn't know, never interviewed for associate positions. From what I hear, more deal- and project-based.
..speaking, modeling, being able to consider 2-3 different transactions (i.e. buy an asset using debt, making a dividend payment and an acquisition using debt, etc.)
but yeah..networking is priority number 1
You have the necessary resources to do well (guides, books, etc.). As long as you put in the time, which it seems like you're willing to do, you should be able to hold your own in the technical interview. Its important that you actually understand what they're asking, rather than just memorizing the material.
I crammed for my interviews for a cumulative of 2 nights before them and got offer. Investment banking interviews are cake man.
Cool story bro... you're probably the dork in the office that no one likes too
Go ahead, throw a monkey shit at me now...
These are the basic fit questions. They sound simple, but they are the most important in my mind: - Tell me about yourself / Walk me through your resume? - Why do you want to do investment banking? - Why do you want to work here?
How to Know Every Technical? (Originally Posted: 12/23/2013)
For those experienced with the interview process for SA IBD positions, any tips on how to answer almost all of the technical questions? Guides to read, things to do? I have about 3 weeks of free time over winter break, so I'm open to anything.
I read the WSO guides, M&I guide, and Rosenbaum, and memorized and actually understood the topics. Based on what I heard, I figured that this would make me quite prepared for my interview. Yet, during my accelerated interview with UBS, I was blindsided by numerous technical questions and quite frankly struggled with the technical interview portion. There were only some "easy" straightforward questions - the majority were quite theoretical and difficult.
Any tips on what else to read or do? Again, I didn't just memorize the answers to the guides; I actually understood the topics, which makes me kind of scared for my other interviews.
Thanks!
As someone preparing to go to a superday, can you give a few specific examples of questions you encountered that you thought difficult?
That's surprising. Most of the interview questions should be covered in the basics sections of M&I. Post a couple of the more difficult questions they asked you.
I recently read that someone got asked this question:
a holding company has a net debt/ebitda ratio of 8x, and it s going to sell an asset for 5x ebitda. how will the net debt/ebitda ratio change?
net debt / EBITDA will go up.
Right now, the Company has $8 of debt for every $1 of EBITDA. When it sells an asset, it's really "selling" EBITDA. However, it's only getting $5 of cash (or debt paydown / negative net debt) for the EBITDA it is giving up. So, following the sale net debt / EBITDA will go up.
With numbers: say you have no cash, 160 debt, 20 EBITDA. 8x net debt / EBITDA. You sell an asset generating 5 of EBITDA for 5x, and receive 25 in cash. Now you have (160-25)=135 net debt, and (20-5)=15 EBITDA. 135 / 15 = 9x net debt / EBITDA, above the original 8x.
Even after memorization of the advanced sections in the BIWS guide?
Either you got some guys who wanted to give you a hard time or you are doing something in your interviews that is prompting your interviewers to keep pushing you to harder and harder technicals. Majority of guys that I know never got anything more advanced than what was in the guides other than a few one-off questions.
BIWS technical guide and wall st. prep modeling courses
If you're memorizing questions, you're asking to get wrecked. You need to focus on understanding concepts and applying that understanding.
The best way to make sure you can answer anything thrown at you is to have a framework of thinking through it... as opposed to memorizing specific answers to questions.
Best way to do this is the understand the fundamentals of accting and corp finance... like time value, valuation, accounting, income/expense matching, etc
Technicals I used to get when recruiting that I thought were particularly difficult were things like walking through how a change in Depreciation flows through each line item in each of the 3 statements, what happens if you capitalize instead of expense R&D, what if you're looking at a company and you see inventories increasing sharply but A/R and A/P are not, what if A/R is increasingly sharply but sales are not and derivations thereof, questions about why you subtract cash from TEV would really stump me too for some reason.
Again best way to prep for these is not to memorize the answer, but to intuitively think through the question so you understand the prevailing concepts that are underpinning the correct answers.
Eum maxime laudantium distinctio vitae voluptas ad. Aspernatur corporis deleniti quo ea velit repudiandae cupiditate eius. Adipisci voluptates totam ut facilis non ipsam. Et atque libero eos suscipit dolores et quia quos.
Quas quod accusantium dolorum molestiae eum qui. Praesentium quia perferendis consequuntur omnis impedit quia officiis. Sit nihil nam distinctio accusamus reiciendis. Rerum consequatur similique veniam consequatur repellendus distinctio sint.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Consequatur enim repellat repellendus qui. Minus ad dolorem deleniti natus velit. Et ipsam officia ratione similique. Quo non hic iste et sit adipisci aut illum.
Voluptatem itaque voluptate nesciunt quisquam eos nihil magnam. Delectus repudiandae voluptatibus alias dolorem sapiente necessitatibus harum. Dolores perspiciatis voluptate eos quibusdam et. Omnis saepe aut sit officia enim consequatur. Fugit eligendi ut magni a asperiores quidem. Aspernatur veniam consequatur at nihil necessitatibus eius.