To absolutely kill technical interviews

So I'm prepping for ft ib internships coming in the falls.
So far, I've read and I'm planning to skim again the WSO guides, 400Qs guide from M&I, and Vault.

I also have Investment Banking Valuation, LBO, M&A by Joshua Rosenbaum et al., which I have not started reading yet.

First of all: do I have enough resources to be able to answer 100% of technicals asked? If not, what else should I study?

Second, I need a routinized system to keep up with them. I currently have two part time internships to keep me busy throughout the day. I was thinking of putting aside half an hour to an hour every night and study more intensely on weekends. But I'm afraid I might forget them come closer to the interviews, if I start now.
So for those of you already in the industry, what was your strategy of keeping up with technicals leading up to the recruiting period?

Thanks.

 
  1. I would not worry about 100% crushing every single question.. its unrealistic tbh. If a banker wants to technically crush you in an interview... it will probably happen.
  2. Find a buddy that has the same goal as you.. mock interviewing each other/discussing answers will make a HUGE difference

But yes, if you know the M&I and WSO guides really well, you will be fine

 

Everything that will likely be asked for an entry-level analyst is probably in M&I/WSO, unless your interviewer really wants to fuck with you OR you come off as arrogant and they don't buy your shit. That said, M&I has a lot of "example"/"general" type questions that can be easily changed around. For example, a lot of the accounting questions in M&I's guide refers to specific line items (depr, COGS, etc.) You don't want to just be blindly memorizing sample questions and answers. In order to kill technical interviews, you need a perfect understanding of the basics. In general, if you have a rock-solid understanding of how everything works - financial statement analysis, valuation, corpfin/projectfin concepts - you can easily figure out many other things.

On a slightly unrelated note, how come no one recommends Heard on the Street anymore? Arguably it's better suited for more quantitative roles, but I found it to be good practice in case of curveball/brainteaser questions.

Currently: future neurologist, current psychotherapist Previously: investor relations (top consulting firm), M&A consulting (Big 4), M&A banking (MM)
 
chicandtoughness:
Everything that will likely be asked for an entry-level analyst is probably in M&I/WSO, unless your interviewer really wants to fuck with you OR you come off as arrogant and they don't buy your shit. That said, M&I has a lot of "example"/"general" type questions that can be easily changed around..

Is this more or less true at the Associate level too?

 
chicandtoughness:
Everything that will likely be asked for an entry-level analyst is probably in M&I/WSO, unless your interviewer really wants to fuck with you OR you come off as arrogant and they don't buy your shit. That said, M&I has a lot of "example"/"general" type questions that can be easily changed around. For example, a lot of the accounting questions in M&I's guide refers to specific line items (depr, COGS, etc.) You don't want to just be blindly memorizing sample questions and answers. In order to kill technical interviews, you need a perfect understanding of the basics. In general, if you have a rock-solid understanding of how everything works - financial statement analysis, valuation, corpfin/projectfin concepts - you can easily figure out many other things.

On a slightly unrelated note, how come no one recommends Heard on the Street anymore? Arguably it's better suited for more quantitative roles, but I found it to be good practice in case of curveball/brainteaser questions.

The reason why people don't recommend Heard on the Street as frequently as the other interview guides is basically within the reason that you gave for recommending it: it focuses on brainteasers and relatively more difficult quantitative questions that might help you differentiate the geniuses from the "normal" smart people, but then again, in IBD, you don't need to be ridiculously smart to succeed. While FT interviews may well include brainteasers, it's a foregone conclusion that they'll include some sort of finance/accounting questions, so I suppose that's why you don't see that guide recommended quite as often.

 

even if you read all of those I can still find a technical you can't answer. You really would have to read textbooks on everything. Not a basic summary like the rosenbaum book or interview guides.

And still, textbook knowledge won't be enough. You'll lack real world experience and research knowledge.

 
Best Response

Couple of thoughts: 1.) Make networking by far your #1 priority. As okay24 mentioned, a banker will screw with you if he/she wants to and it is impossible to be prepared from every technical angle. Make sure you network hard to land the interview in the first place and earn positive reputations at the banks / dependable relationships. Virtually everything will hinge on that. If the banker likes you and the recruiting team has notes that you have done well in informational interviews, your real / superday interviews will go well with softball questions. Most people who get tough technical questions are the candidates whom bankers don't really like / know well.

2.) Make sure you don't memorize and regurgitate your answers. You should ideally be able to know the concepts so well that you can verbalize them in a simple / easy-going / smooth way. I hate it when people repeat answers / phrases from the guides verbatim as it is obvious and boring. Try to break it down into simple and summarized concepts...

3.) To really demonstrate your mastery - be able to weave in deals and existing issues. For example, if someone asks you about IPOs, you can define it but also relate it / comment / weave in factors regarding the Facebook IPO. I am fairly impressed it someone can answer a question and then find a relevant example. Anyone can define what "capital structure" is but a great answer would be the summary and - on top of that - an example of a company and that company's capital structure.

 

Studying guides at length and in depth will be hugely helpful, but the only way to "kill it" it to understand the stuff well. Make sure you have an understanding of the material that technical questions are asking about. As a couple people mentioned before, the standard questions can be flipped around to throw you for a loop. You may even hear some completely new ones out of left-field that the interviewer comes up with just to test whether you really understand the concepts behind the questions.

So basically, beyond the standard (i.e. how does depreciation flow through, etc.) focus more on developing an understanding of how everything works. You'll end up being much better prepared to think through tough questions when they get thrown at you.

 
wso1234:
Studying guides at length and in depth will be hugely helpful, but the only way to "kill it" it to understand the stuff well. Make sure you have an understanding of the material that technical questions are asking about. As a couple people mentioned before, the standard questions can be flipped around to throw you for a loop. You may even hear some completely new ones out of left-field that the interviewer comes up with just to test whether you really understand the concepts behind the questions.

So basically, beyond the standard (i.e. how does depreciation flow through, etc.) focus more on developing an understanding of how everything works. You'll end up being much better prepared to think through tough questions when they get thrown at you.

This is awesome advice and I think you have the right attitude in mind; look at preparing for the technical aspect of IB interviews as an open book test and everything that you have/should have learned at the UG level [and some above] is fair game.

I've said this before and I'll say it again every time these 'prep' threads show up its fine to be prepared for all the questions you may be asked, hell even w/ some script as well, but also be prepared to back your answers. Having prepared answers though should be a no-brainer. If you can do this you're probably 50% better prepared than your peers, but you should take it to the next level and leave nothing on the table. You should actually practice what you're learning. Take the time to build a model or two, three or more and have that motherfucker 'break' on you and #ref on when you plug your ending cash back in the balance sheet from the statement of cash flows. I think there's some valuable experience in chasing down mistakes and it brings you to the 'next level'. You'll develop a familiarity and comfort with the financial statements that you wouldn't gain otherwise and won't be left sweating out a stupid debit/credit question that seems a bit foreign to you when you've been spending all of your time in LBO land. Building/breaking models pulls on all of the nitty-gritty details that you skip when you study a canned 5 line response to DCF, Acc/Dil., or LBO question.

Chances are, if you're not a dick, you won't get asked anything ridiculous, but you want to be prepared for that arrogant Associate fresh out of b-school that thinks he's the shit and drills you with something. I'd also hazard a guess that if you develop a comfort with financial modeling/interview questions it does loads for your confidence. Yes, it's important to toe the line and not be a snobby know-it-all, but it'll hurt even worse to look like a fool when an interviewer 'digs' into your knowledgebase and exposes your ass to get burnt.

So study like you are and throw in modeling and if you're weak recognize it and don't push the shit off. There's nothing wrong w/ coming home from two internships broke-the-fuck-off and tired and studying. Optimal? Probably not, but there's winners and losers and you don't want to be left standing outside the circle in November. Feels like shit.

'Before you enter... be willing to pay the price'
 

I wouldn't know, never interviewed for associate positions. From what I hear, more deal- and project-based.

Currently: future neurologist, current psychotherapist Previously: investor relations (top consulting firm), M&A consulting (Big 4), M&A banking (MM)
 
  1. practice
  2. practice
  3. practice

..speaking, modeling, being able to consider 2-3 different transactions (i.e. buy an asset using debt, making a dividend payment and an acquisition using debt, etc.)

but yeah..networking is priority number 1

------------ I'm making it up as I go along.
 

You have the necessary resources to do well (guides, books, etc.). As long as you put in the time, which it seems like you're willing to do, you should be able to hold your own in the technical interview. Its important that you actually understand what they're asking, rather than just memorizing the material.

 

I recently read that someone got asked this question:

a holding company has a net debt/ebitda ratio of 8x, and it s going to sell an asset for 5x ebitda. how will the net debt/ebitda ratio change?

When luck shuts the door you gotta come in through the window - Doyle Brunson
 
upod01:

I recently read that someone got asked this question:

a holding company has a net debt/ebitda ratio of 8x, and it s going to sell an asset for 5x ebitda. how will the net debt/ebitda ratio change?

net debt / EBITDA will go up.

Right now, the Company has $8 of debt for every $1 of EBITDA. When it sells an asset, it's really "selling" EBITDA. However, it's only getting $5 of cash (or debt paydown / negative net debt) for the EBITDA it is giving up. So, following the sale net debt / EBITDA will go up.

With numbers: say you have no cash, 160 debt, 20 EBITDA. 8x net debt / EBITDA. You sell an asset generating 5 of EBITDA for 5x, and receive 25 in cash. Now you have (160-25)=135 net debt, and (20-5)=15 EBITDA. 135 / 15 = 9x net debt / EBITDA, above the original 8x.

 

The best way to make sure you can answer anything thrown at you is to have a framework of thinking through it... as opposed to memorizing specific answers to questions.

Best way to do this is the understand the fundamentals of accting and corp finance... like time value, valuation, accounting, income/expense matching, etc

Technicals I used to get when recruiting that I thought were particularly difficult were things like walking through how a change in Depreciation flows through each line item in each of the 3 statements, what happens if you capitalize instead of expense R&D, what if you're looking at a company and you see inventories increasing sharply but A/R and A/P are not, what if A/R is increasingly sharply but sales are not and derivations thereof, questions about why you subtract cash from TEV would really stump me too for some reason.

Again best way to prep for these is not to memorize the answer, but to intuitively think through the question so you understand the prevailing concepts that are underpinning the correct answers.

 

Eum maxime laudantium distinctio vitae voluptas ad. Aspernatur corporis deleniti quo ea velit repudiandae cupiditate eius. Adipisci voluptates totam ut facilis non ipsam. Et atque libero eos suscipit dolores et quia quos.

Quas quod accusantium dolorum molestiae eum qui. Praesentium quia perferendis consequuntur omnis impedit quia officiis. Sit nihil nam distinctio accusamus reiciendis. Rerum consequatur similique veniam consequatur repellendus distinctio sint.

 

Consequatur enim repellat repellendus qui. Minus ad dolorem deleniti natus velit. Et ipsam officia ratione similique. Quo non hic iste et sit adipisci aut illum.

Voluptatem itaque voluptate nesciunt quisquam eos nihil magnam. Delectus repudiandae voluptatibus alias dolorem sapiente necessitatibus harum. Dolores perspiciatis voluptate eos quibusdam et. Omnis saepe aut sit officia enim consequatur. Fugit eligendi ut magni a asperiores quidem. Aspernatur veniam consequatur at nihil necessitatibus eius.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”