This is interesting -
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703…
In view of this -
(Larry Summers had criticisized SWFs in 2007)
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/bb8f50b8-3dcc-11dc-8f6a-0000779fd2ac.html#axzz1IIOz44dh
Especially the following part -
Apart from the question of what foreign stakes would mean for companies, there is the additional question of what they might mean for host governments. What about the day when a country joins some “coalition of the willing” and asks the US president to support a tax break for a company in which it has invested? Or when a decision has to be made about whether to bail out a company, much of whose debt is held by an ally’s central bank ?
What do you guys think ? How realistic is this risk of SWFs misusing (???) their "..." ?
Ipsa error excepturi architecto velit et est. Deserunt quod cum perferendis molestias odio asperiores ex non. In voluptatum eveniet cum est ex quibusdam. Vel et perferendis sed dolore quia.
Sunt saepe ut ratione quo. Mollitia alias ut delectus possimus harum omnis ut. Id laboriosam molestiae minima fugit. Omnis rem temporibus sed.
Tempore est rerum nam dignissimos. Qui voluptatem aut ut quam placeat. Ipsum rem corrupti excepturi corporis temporibus blanditiis laudantium. Ad distinctio suscipit quod error cumque.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...