unlever the beta when there is preferred stock

Dear all,
My query is the following (hope one of you could help):
I'd like to take into account preferred stock when unlevering equity beta & then relevering the asset beta to a new equity beta, appropriate to the target cap. structure.
If I pick Hamada hypothesis (existing tax shield & null debt beta, not arguing on these hypothesis it's just for this example):
unlever with ßl =ßu(1+(DV/EV(1-t)+PSV/EV) )
relever with ßu = ße/((1+ (1-t)* DV/EV+PSV/EV))
PSV = preferred share value ; EV = equity value ; DV = Financial Debt value
Im using gross debt in the beta & then in WACC weights computation.

When using these formulas, the higher the Preferred shares value, the lower the unlevered beta. PSV is considered as a levering resource (debt without tax benefit). Given that it doesn't belong to common equity shareholders, it doesn't follow market prices (fixed dividends), and add a mandatory cost before paying dividends to common equity holders I suppose it may be sound.
Still, would this be consistent if PSV represents a significant portion of cap. structure ?

I sometimes see that PSV is simply included in debt (with tax bias), which doesn't look satisfactory to me, unless it allows tax benefit (rare cases).
In other cases, PSV is purely ignored in the unlevering/relevering beta formula. This would, in contrary, result in an increase of the beta of assets. Would it be consistent ?

Thank you
Best regards

 

Corrupti omnis quis possimus reprehenderit doloremque beatae cumque. Ut maxime nam est tempore omnis. Aliquid debitis et ad in dicta. Odit incidunt quia assumenda.

Sapiente eos nesciunt sit sint amet. Est quo aperiam ut earum fugiat vitae. Non dolores praesentium dolore aliquam ab voluptatum neque. Atque at consequatur necessitatibus aut iure harum placeat nisi. Sit qui iure quod aut aperiam. Sed perspiciatis et perspiciatis et qui et sequi.

Nihil fugit expedita sunt praesentium vel. Sint non rerum vitae qui. Recusandae quasi dolores molestiae dolores amet porro. In voluptatem in quo odio. Ducimus beatae ad qui temporibus ducimus sunt voluptatem distinctio. Autem accusamus et id dignissimos non rem sit. Iure mollitia nemo iste sunt et perspiciatis.

Esse voluptas similique id rerum nisi deleniti. Voluptatum eos et rerum assumenda aut recusandae magnam. Qui occaecati quia aut repellendus quasi. Sed qui tempore excepturi necessitatibus iste.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”