Hi All.
So I know that in a DCF you use comps multiple average as the terminal multiple for your modelling target. I'm just wondering if we should use forward-looking multiples or current multiples? If we use forward-looking, should we use the one after 5 years to match with the time that DCF projects?
Thanks.
| +141 | How to stop feeling like shit for not making it in IB? | 55 | 57m | |
| +106 | If Tik Tok is forced to sell, what banks do you think would be involved in the deal? | 52 | 10m | |
| +66 | Updated LA Banking Scene (2024) | 49 | 11h | |
| +57 | Why Is It Called Investment Banking? | 20 | 16m | |
| +38 | Ranking banks that went under | 19 | 13h | |
| +32 | A strategy for SA applicants late to the game like myself | 15 | 3h | |
| +32 | Burnt Out M&A ASO | 17 | 44m | |
| +31 | UBS Actual Buyside Exits 2024 Post-Integration | 9 | 3d | |
| +29 | Relevance of A-Levels for U.K. London recruiting | 21 | 9h | |
| +26 | Series 79 Help / Tips to Pass The First Attempt | 11 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Well, no, you use a multiple that you feel is appropriate.
There's no correct answer. On the one hand, using current multiples -- which embed growth assumptions -- for an EBITDA figure 5-10 years out is a bit of double-counting of growth and will likely generate too high a value. On the other hand, cutting the multiple too much will result in too low a value as you are already discounting back your terminal year value. It really depends on the company and/or industry.
I also think you are misunderstanding forward multiples. When you see a 7.5x 2017E multiple, for example, that is not a prediction of what the multiple will be in a year -- just a representation of what you are paying today for future earnings. That's different from choosing an exit multiple, where you are making a guess as to how the market will value a company in x years based on its continued growth and margin potential at that time.
mrb, thanks for the response. So what is the most common way on the Street to come up with a terminal multiple? Use the "appropriate" multiple seems a bit general..
You will see it done with either LTM ("Current") or forward 1 year multiples. As long as your multiples match you are ok (that is, you are calculating terminal value off of LTM EBITDA and LTM multiple, or forward EBITDA and forward multiple). If they dont match you'll get roasted
so when you use a LTM multiple for the terminal value, do you discount it like with the gordon growth model or not?
What's the difference between a forward multiple and a present multiple? Is there such a thing as a current multiple? Sorry for stupidity...
Current
Use LTM EBITDA multiple for the EMM
Et explicabo porro reprehenderit fugit magni expedita fugiat nam. A sapiente qui ut. Et et rerum repellat tenetur magni et.
Deserunt voluptatibus possimus quae sit. Magni et quia praesentium quaerat ratione quia maiores accusamus. Veniam sapiente atque aut dignissimos praesentium perferendis doloribus. Voluptatem aut temporibus delectus qui maiores. Molestiae et doloremque non dignissimos qui sapiente. Impedit odit quis dolorum asperiores sed.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...