Using Cash in LBO

Hi all,

I was studying technical for the fall recruitment and had a question regarding the type of financing one would use for a LBO. I realize that it wouldn't be a LBO any more if one uses cash but the guide was asking why a PE firm would use leverage instead of cash in an LBO transaction. The answer was that using leverage will boost its return by reducing the amount of capital it has contributed upfront. However, I was a little bit confused because you are using the cash flow of the purchased company to pay off the principal and interest of the debt. Wouldn't it generate more return if you purchase the company with cash (a cheaper form of capital) and just take the generated cash flow by paying it as dividend instead of paying for the interest on the debt that you would use for an LBO and exit out with the same multiple? I understand you would have to use leverage for it to be a LBO but I was not quite sure why using leverage will boost your return throughout the investment horizon. Is the boost in return referring to the exit moment?

Thanks!

 

I think you're overcomplicating it for yourself. It's as simple as this (feeding off the previous example):

To calculate your return on your capital you subtract the purchase price (the portion made up by cash), or initial value, from the final value (1B in this case), then divide the result by the purchase price. To get it as a percentage you multiply the result by 100. In this example your initial total investment was 500m.

Scenario 1: 100m cash + 400m debt = 500m initial investment. 1B - 100m = 900m ... 900m/100m = 9 ... 9 * 100 = 900% return on your cash

Scenario 2: 500m cash = 500m initial investment. 1B - 500m = 500m ... 500m/500m = 1 ... 1 * 100 = 100% return on your cash

You can see how leverage in scenario 1 significantly boosts the return on your capital. Hope that helps.

 

PE Firm Goal: Maximize return while balancing risk, opportunity cost, partnering agreements, servicing/enhancing other investments. Thus judicious use of capital available for investments may include spreading those funds over multiple investments. As the above example pointed out 9x looks better than 1x. It also allows you to make -1x to 12x on several other investments hopefully bettering you chances of exceeding your hurdle rate...

or I could be blowing smoke...

 

Some quick thoughts. Interest is tax deductible but does not reduce value so there are economic advantages to debt. Also, cash is a limited resource, while your thesis is correct you did not factor in risk. Let's say that there is an 80% chance of success in an investment, 20% gets wiped out . If you spread your bets over 5 companies you'll likely find your success metric - and then you raise fund #2. If you bet it all on one company you may find that 20% and then you're unemployed.

There are some PEGS that do invest cash and do follow your thesis. They do a lot of all cash deals and reduce their odds that way. I just talked to one a few weeks ago on the west coast.

Global buyer of highly distressed industrial companies. Pays Finder Fees Criteria = $50 - $500M revenues. Highly distressed industrial. Limited Reps and Warranties. Can close in 1-2 weeks.
 
Best Response

During school I worked for a group that specialized in smaller multi family housing. We would put together deals that only needed one or two investors, on average.

One day, some rich kid that didn't know jack about investing got in touch with us and wanted to buy a 15-20 unit building in town. He said he'd do all cash. While an all cash offer gets things moving faster, we explained how he could invest in three different projects simultaneously at 30-35% equity in each since the CF from rent could cover debt service and expenses. The result is diversified risk, i.e. can afford to have one or two properties fail, and potential to make three times as much.

So OP, leverage lets you put in less money to get a higher % return i.e. put in 30 for something worth 100. Exit when it's worth 200, MoM is 6.7x. As opposed to put in 100 and have a MoM of 2x. The key is being able to service the debt with CF from operations, hence why LBO targets typically have predictable cash flow. Additionally, you want to pay down debt so you can participate more in the exit/pay less interest going forward.

 

One more thought, I've seen cash work to get deals closed quickly and then the PEG will leverage up the investment in the following months. It's a good strategy, cash is the strategic advantage to get the LOI signed but the final structure ends up looking like everyone else with debt.

Global buyer of highly distressed industrial companies. Pays Finder Fees Criteria = $50 - $500M revenues. Highly distressed industrial. Limited Reps and Warranties. Can close in 1-2 weeks.
 

Not entirely sure what part is confusing you, can you perhaps clarify further? When doing the adjustments for the acquisition, zero out the cash balance and make all of that cash additional proceeds to the seller. Then, start your LBO in year 1 with no cash on the balance sheet. Proceed to generate cash through operations in Y1 and use that cash to pay down debt.

Quite honestly, you don't care about the cash balance in the years leading up to the acquisition. All cash is being swept in the acquisition and the cash generated was under a different capital structure.

CompBanker’s Career Guidance Services: https://www.rossettiadvisors.com/
 

Quam quisquam quibusdam voluptatum incidunt autem. Sint aut voluptatem voluptate voluptatem rerum amet corrupti. Ullam sed molestias libero quibusdam ipsa nesciunt amet autem. Commodi voluptatem molestias alias. Ex qui sed minima perferendis alias.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”