Valuation of a company

I'm still in the basics of valuation and trying to learn the concepts. I came across this concept of adjusting the EBIT. So, tried performing the calculation on my own to value these 2 companies. Am I correct in my calculation?

(1) Company A: Owns PPE worth $ 1,000,000 with EBIT $500,000. PPE are used to perform the business operations

(2) Company B: Leases PPE on rent of $ 30,000/year and owns property valued at $ 200,000. EBIT $100,000

Assume both are competitors in the industry and a seller is willing to pay 3x EBIT. Would it be correct if I say the following?

(1) Valuation of Company A:

3 x 500,000 = 1,500,000 + 1,000,000 = $ 2.5 M

(2) Valuation of Company B:

3 x (100,000 - 30,000) = 210,000 + 200,000 = $ 410,000

If Company B leases all PPE, will it be correct if I say:

Valuation of Company B = 3 x (100,000 - 30,000) = 210,000 + 1,000,000 = $ 1.21 M

I'll appreciate your help and comments. Correct me if I'm missing something here.

 
Best Response

Company A should only be worth $1.5 million, you shouldn't add the PPE. You only want to add excess assets to the valuation; assets that could be sold without affecting the EBIT number you are using in the valuation. In this case, the $500K of EBIT you are projecting is only achievable by utilizing the $1M of PPE. Imagine a simple scenario, like a coffee shop with one machine; with the machine, you might generate $50K of earnings over the year. The machine is worth $5K. In valuing the shop, you would not add the $5K value of the machine to the value of the stream of $50K per year, because without the machine, you couldn't sell coffee. You can either use the machine to sell coffee and get a $50k per year income, or you could sell off the machine, but not both.

With Company B, unless otherwise stated, rent should be factored into EBIT already, so there'd be no need to subtract it out specifically. If the property the company owned is not utilized by the business, then in this case it does make sense to add on the value as an excess asset.

 

Voluptatum odio autem qui quis amet tenetur. Facilis omnis iure quibusdam enim.

Ut nesciunt ex qui exercitationem quae eum praesentium. Consequatur quidem at nobis quia et praesentium aut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”