WACC vs Levered Beta
I'm a RE Finance major who is applying to an honors finance program at my school. The program is primarily for placing kids into IB, which I'm not particularly interested in as a career path, but I want to learn the technical finance skills that IB guys have.
We're doing mock interviews for the program right now and one of I was asked a DCF question. When asked how to determine what discount rate to use I said that I would back out an asset beta from the company's equity beta (unless the investment was a scale-expansion) and plug it into the CAPM.
The interviewer said that this was wrong and that I should use WACC because it takes debt into account. My understanding is that using levered betas in the CAPM formula also takes debt into account because the asset beta formula is Beta_asset=Beta_equity(E/D(1-Tax)+E)). So isn't the capital structure taken into account?
Interviewer is right, in the beta you are acounting for the fact that equity becomes riskier with higher debt level, then in WACC you take into account the cost of debt and tax shields
So you're taking seats from other kids to get into a program that is specialized for something you don't actually appreciate, and you don't know these basic answers? You seem kinda like a tool.
Deserunt perferendis veniam numquam sit recusandae quis modi nihil. Ducimus itaque et ratione doloribus. Quaerat totam debitis facilis. Aut vero rem consequuntur ut at.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...