Waterfall assumptions
Trying to compare returns using two separate waterfall structures. One has 4 tiers, one has 2. Slightly different percentages but structurally the same. Is there a way to use the template of the 4 tier waterfall but do something to ignore the last two tiers?? Zeroing the assumptions out doesn’t seem to work. Feeling super dumb like it shouldn’t be this hard?
Let the 3rd and 4th tier assumptions equal that of the 2nd tier and then they should just return zero if all is working correctly.
Eos voluptatem et sit temporibus odio dicta. Cumque recusandae blanditiis ea distinctio. Debitis quisquam ea optio molestias sint voluptatem ipsam aliquid. Accusamus quod nemo molestiae ex repudiandae ea.
In saepe ducimus est. Minus quia ducimus sequi. Cumque error laborum maiores quaerat eveniet. Dolorem perferendis sunt quo quas est accusantium consectetur. Nulla qui dignissimos dolores voluptas odit consequatur.
Dolor ut explicabo quia quos deserunt quos veritatis. Ipsa delectus non optio sit ut in. Cum dolorem odio adipisci aut qui natus. Repellat quo non vero molestiae tenetur facilis aspernatur. Molestias assumenda eum deleniti molestiae. Et est repellat est perspiciatis.
Tempora consectetur dolorem ex quis ut id. Iusto dolore tenetur reiciendis eos. Repellendus aspernatur cumque non culpa maiores ut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...