No, it's not. The accessibility to easily raise capital / get plugged into the VC ecosystem drops off after Harvard and Stanford. Not going to knock on the third best business school in the world, but you'd be better served by HBS for your goals. This rings especially true if you don't even have an idea of what you want to start yet. 

 

This is a troll. No one who got into both HBS FT and Wharton EMBA would ever be so unaware to even ask this question. Wharton EMBA is a non-selective program with ~50% acceptance rate, and no one in the business will take it as seriously as a Wharton FT degree. HBS full-time is not only meaningfully better than Wharton FT, but much harder to get into with a better network across the board. HBS vs. Wharton FT would be a no-brainer in almost all cases, and this one is so far beyond obvious it's laughable. 

 

Not a troll. When you're a few years out, I've heard that no one cares/asks whether you did the part-time or full-time program and you get the same degree in the end. For older candidates, part-time would make more sense given the opportunity cost so this is a genuine dilemma

 
Most Helpful

Without much more information, my inclination would do neither. Two years worth of time devoted to classes / extra-curriculars and full tuition price is a relatively big price to pay relative to the network you gain / easier ability to tell a story and raise money. Its not obvious answer TBC, but I would worry that you will find spending yourself way more time on classes vs. actually starting a business and wonder why you are spending 75k each year for classes vs. investing it in your business / paying for your life. I think some of the important variables to take into account are how serious you are about pursuing entrepreneurial path and how useful is your current network as it currently stands without business school. If you are on the fence about starting a venture /value optionality and have a low quality network currently, then HBS might be the right choice.

One other option is to try to land a job at a fast-growing start-up with a product you like to see if you enjoy the experience and, if so, you can gain access to that network and launch your own pursuit after a year or so in a role.

 

I'm in venture / growth. I would recommend going to HBS if you end goal is to come out with the beginnings of a good venture-backable company, or at least a robust co-founders / investor network you can rely on. 

The reason is not branding. If you're sitting across the table raising funding from investors, none of them are going to dock you for getting a Wharton EMBA particularly if you're in your 30s, *unless* someone uses "went to Wharton" as a crutch instead of talking about their background and relevant experience

HBS FT has a much higher proportion of founder types who came from a variety of backgrounds and now have the same explicit, entrepreneurial goals as you. It is also has a much higher proportion of folks who are coming from and/or headed to venture funds, operating roles in tech co's, etc. who will become a great resource for you. Not to mention the campus itself has tons of resources dedicated to entrepreneurship.

On the other hand, the avg. demographic of EMBA students might be of similar age, but mostly using the MBA to climb a couple rungs in an F500, switch from a manager role in industry X to sr. manager in industry Y, or if they were engineers, looking to learn some classroom business skills. 

Also, given that you're coming from a non-business background, if you at any point you decide you want to try something more traditional (i.e. consulting, F500) a FT MBA will open more doors in that regards than a PT MBA, particularly one from HBS.

 

Atque quia at magnam iure. Sapiente dignissimos aspernatur tempore ex. Quo dolore perspiciatis soluta fugiat numquam corporis.

Labore voluptatem ut quam quam vel repellendus. Eum est enim quis esse sunt eum illo. Itaque et quas eos culpa porro. Et nulla at aut. In illo iure et accusantium illo. Est dicta ratione vel est occaecati. Odio velit quasi ut quo nulla.

Similique quia esse maxime qui sapiente quidem vel et. Voluptatem quos nam magnam occaecati enim ducimus aut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”