What is tax equity financing?

I'm curious if anyone has any experience with tax equity financing. From what I understand, the investor (bank) gives $ to the project developers. In return for this capital, the bank gets the rights to any tax incentives that the developer might have.

What I'm unsure of is this - does the bank get an actual equity stake in the project? Or, is it essentially debt that the bank is buying, so the bank receives the debt service payments + tax incentives? --- Does it just depend on the deal and there is no 'typical' way these work.

If someone could provide some insight on this, I'd be most appreciative. Sorry if my post is vague, I'm new to this.

 

I worked in affordable housing debt finance for a while, so I'm not an expert on this but I do have some background.

Basically, as I recall--and it's been a while--it is called "equity financing" because there is no repayment associated with the proceeds. The investor--usually a bank--will put up, say, 25% of the project financing, which is used as equity. The other, say, 75% comes from a loan. The 25% equity stake allows the investor to take tax credits of a certain amount. For example, if the bank puts up $1 million in equity, the bank can theoretically reduce their taxes, say, $100,000 per year for 10 years.

Where it can become profitable for the investor is if they buy $1 million of tax credits, say, 75 cents on the dollars. It means they are putting up $750,000 and writing off $1 million on their taxes (over a period of time). There is risk, however, of loss when there are defaults, regulatory violations, etc., which is why you might see tax credits sell at a discount, sometimes at substantial discounts to par.

Array
 

Interesting. Thank you for your comment! I'm trying to model this for some projects, and I'm trying to figure out exactly how to make it work.

If anyone has anything useful to add, please feel free!

I'll do what I can to help ya'll. But, the game's out there, and it's play or get played.
 

This may seem pretty obvious, but just as a reminder--tax credits are different than tax write-offs. If we're talking tax credit investing write-offs, we're literally talking a reduction in taxes owed dollar for dollar. So your model needs to adjust for the fact that if a company owes $100,000 in taxes and applies $100,000 in tax credits then the company has no tax liability.

Array
 
Best Response

Modeling it can get pretty complicated, but below is the idea:

Take a solar developer, for example:

Usually a tax equity investor will come in and provide a check to a developer once the project starts commercial operations.

In exchange, the tax equity investor typically gets a certain percentage of both the cash and tax attributes of the project going forward. This is typically structured as part of a partnership flip structure, where the investor receives, as an example, 99% of the cash and tax attributes pre-flip and 1% of the cash and tax attributes post-flip. In solar, tax attributes are available in the form of investment tax credits and accelerated depreciation 5-year MACRS and/or bonus depreciation.

What determines the flip year is typically a return threshold, but many cases it's a combination of factors relating to the cash and tax attributes of the project and what the tax equity investors' investment horizon is. For some projects, tax equity investors actually make their returns thresholds in just 1 or 2 years, however many of these investors want to be invested for at least 5-6 years (for solar, that's the accelerated MACRS schedule). This makes modeling and structuring a deal pretty complicated.

 

because then you might as well push the DCF out another year since you did the projection and use LTM multiple for year 6 or 11

the exception being PE exit where target holding period is defined for IRR calculation purposes but then you would be sensitizing around that anyway

 

leverage multiples are calced off of ltm from what I've seen (because debt is more conservative).

equity is calced off of forward (equity should be valued off of the future FCF of a company. or, if company is a fast grower [double digits % growth], LTM doesn't really make sense to value off of).

 

Nulla deleniti in veniam voluptas est illum. Velit dolor sint in occaecati et. Inventore voluptatem culpa quis autem. Illum necessitatibus vel accusantium saepe necessitatibus. Ipsum vel dolorem quisquam sed voluptas. Repellat quod debitis sed quod.

Aperiam consequatur aperiam et rerum sunt facere natus. Nemo iusto sequi occaecati ducimus sunt sunt. Cupiditate ab nihil facilis. Iusto delectus cum earum ut nemo enim. Eos voluptatem vel qui. Dolorem enim omnis accusantium facilis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (21) $586
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (89) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (204) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (386) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (28) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (313) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”