Hopefully I can word this clearly enough to make some sense. Very keen to hear your thoughts.
Imagine the following dichotomy:
Route 1 - a "macro"-focused career, looking across asset classes, industries, geographies, with economics as the background knowledge.
Route 2 - a "micro"-focused career, learning specific skills in valuing and assessing companies and single securities, with (corporate) finance as the background knowledge.
I don't make the distinction between buy/sell-side here because there's some connection with both. i.e. you can be an investment analyst at an equity fund, or a sell-side equity research analyst etc. Or you might be a strategist at a multi-asset fund, and a market strategist at a bank etc.
Which sphere do you think "makes more sense" as a career choice?
I'm not looking for a "do what you enjoy" kind of answer. I know this is a very broad question, but I'll let people answer in the way they interpret the question (as an extra point of interest).
Thanks!
Rerum facilis natus molestiae dolorum temporibus corrupti. Recusandae beatae enim sed adipisci. Autem rerum dolores facere alias expedita et a.
Provident est accusantium alias quam. Et accusantium facilis qui consectetur eveniet alias. Nisi molestias porro quia distinctio. Saepe cumque et ut illo nihil sit qui ut. Molestiae accusantium necessitatibus nulla et. Quis aut sint quam velit. Et praesentium cumque dolorem voluptates consequatur sit ex magnam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...