What sources do you use for primary research?
In a world where information advantage is so little, how do you do differentiated primary research? And what are the most reliable sources (in your opinion)?
In a world where information advantage is so little, how do you do differentiated primary research? And what are the most reliable sources (in your opinion)?
+42 | Compiled Bondarb's Comment History | 9 | 2h | |
+37 | T2 Hedge fund or T1 LO/AM? | 13 | 13h | |
+31 | Non-GAAP Income Statement | 6 | 2d | |
+22 | How do you get up to speed as a consultant on finance? | 5 | 3s | |
+22 | Thoughts on MMF | 17 | 4h | |
+21 | Are most HF opportunities actually not in L/S equities? | 9 | 4d | |
+21 | MLP portfolio manager guaranteed payouts? | 19 | 3h | |
+20 | Top LO AM culture, comp, exit opps, etc. | 4 | 3d | |
+18 | How to Structure Bonus Comp for Analyst | 5 | 1d | |
Joining buy-side directly at boutique AM or ER at BB for HF future? | 9 | 6d |
Career Resources
Google Trends
bs sometimes it helps, but most of the time g trends by itself can be very misleading
agreed
was being sarcastic. okay place to start but I probably wouldn't put a chart w/ google trends in front of my PMs
When I have done networking calls or just talked to other analysts this is always something I ask about. The majority of people think that GLG calls are primary research, but that just isn't going to provide you any kind of edge if everyone does them. Other responses have been that you get a really low return on the time and effort required to conduct primary research sufficiently enough to be able to trust in the mosaic, because for the most part no one can tell you anything of value anymore that isn't already public. The only funds that find this type of work worthwhile are ultra-concentrated, like 10 or less names. The last response I get is that meeting with management and actually visiting the companies is their primary research. I personally think that forming this kind of close relationship with management biases you. I have never met a CEO I didn't like or who told me something negative about their company. If the investment comes down to your gut feeling on someone or how nice their corporate headquarters are it's probably not an investment that was worth making in the first place. That type of analysis is superficial.
The only time I ever got an interesting response in regards to the primary research question was one guy told me he will just cold message people on linkedin in different departments at his target companies. Low hit rate but said it gives him an interesting perspective on the company, the culture, and perhaps some of its specific functions. I have not personally tried this.
So, what kind of research do you do?
That last guy's strat sounds like a compliance no-go and a quick way to get yourself restricted from all your stocks.
Really? I am pretty sure that's a compliance violation for someone at a public company talking about internal business performance or results
Ya I think he’s aware that he can’t ask questions like “what are earnings going to be next quarter”. I think he asks more things like “what is your opinion of management”; “do you feel like this is a place you want to work long term?”; “what kind of incentives are part of your overall compensation?”
Using a wide variety of alternative data sources is pretty good primary research, especially if you enrich the data yourself after joining tables and sharding. However this approach requires both $ and creativity, and YMWV based on the specific company.
Also good luck getting anyone to tell you HOW they're using the data. At best they'll tell you which ones they use.
following
no need to overcomplicate this or give people too much credit lol
primary research at most long/short funds is mostly copying what your friends are doing but making it sound like you got it from an expert call or other differentiated source
if you want to actually do primary research then I'd recommend you look at some of the famous activist short seller pitches. they do great primary research. nobody actually does this kind of work at most long/short funds though, but sometimes they pretend to
Yep, everyone does "deep private equity style research" in their pitch deck, but don't ask them to explain what that means or what they do that is actually differentiated.
Something that people here overlook is that if you work at a small to medium sized fund, you won't even have access to some "basic" things that many people here mention, such as GLG, credit card and alternative data, certain sellside research (if your fund doesn't have a relationship with a bank, good luck getting that research report that you need), getting sellside analysts to take your call, access to inustry reports, access to third party research services, etc. I get contacted all of the time by these service. For example, I recently spoke to a 3rd party forensic accounting service that was started by the foremost expert in the field. There are firms out there who have his team on retainer to work on anything and everything. I have never worked at a large fund, but I can only imagine how much of a luxury it is to be able to have access to all of this information at your fingertips.
Have you guys heard of Tegus at all? Really interesting take on primary research. Tegus.co
Never heard of it. Looks like any other expert network? Not seeing anything new/interesting.
How does this differ from Thirdbrige or Guidepoint - seems like they have data? but just normal calls like the other two? Are the putting a transcript of every 1:1 into the data base for any user to have access? That would be both great and horrible.
Tegus is just an expert network. All expert calls are transcribed and then uploaded to their database for everyone to read. So you can see how that might be a problem. Most funds that use Tegus are smaller because they are a lot less expensive than GLG.
Simplistically, there are two buckets of primary research, company and industry. I think from an industry perspective, especially if you're new to a sector, its important to verify info in decks/materials. Government sites, US and also international organization, provide lots of good data on a host of subjects. Much of it you can download too. For sector specific, there is typically at least 1 industry rag (paper or digital) if not more that can provide good insight. Yea you might not be unlocking unknown truths but at a minimum you're getting smart on a sector doing these types of things and at best many people aren't so there is some edge in that regard. For company specific, local papers tend to have way more informative articles/interviews. Often time a company is a big deal in town so there is just much better access and information, hidden gems can be found. For things like retailers, you can go to malls/stores and see the condition they are in and try to talk to the sales manager. I've done this a lot. Or I've also called sales departments inquiring about certain products to hear the pitch, see if any issues have come up, whatever random questions I might have to get an understanding of how thinks work. I don't think any of these things are ground breaking but any little bit helps you're understanding of an industry/company - might not give you edge per se but certainly will help you make an informed decision, which is really all that matters in my view. "Edge" is kinda a bullshit thing 90%+ of the time in my view (speaking fundamentally, not trading).
IMO there are three steps to research: 1) getting informed, 2) organizing information, and 3) following hunches.
Being able to find and exploit alpha opportunities requires a ton of creativity and a willingness/eagerness to grow. Therefore, get to know as many tools/approaches as possible, and be creative/"flexible" about getting the information you need. For example, if you cannot afford an expert network, conduct an informal survey/interview with the company you are researching, reach out to professors at universities to get their opinions, cold email vendors and ask general questions (payment terms, are they seeing growth, etc.), read-through other research reports or economic indicators to get a feel for a company/industry as well. Personally, I avoid the canned alpha sources because anyone with a budget can get access to the same data. Therefore, I prefer the networks of information I create, as those are harder to replicate, give me more control over the information, and are closer to the source.
WallStreetBets
Dolores molestiae iure ea. Ut dolorum velit ratione. Possimus rem ea quia. Et veritatis velit suscipit fuga blanditiis.
Nostrum rerum aut consequuntur blanditiis sed nemo voluptate sed. Tenetur et dolor enim in natus. Qui in voluptatum dolore possimus dolor dolores. Laboriosam mollitia est ipsa autem. Atque illum beatae esse perspiciatis sed sed aspernatur. Voluptatibus tempore tenetur autem eos. Harum quisquam et sint.
Consequatur possimus saepe cumque minima deleniti repellendus odit. Odit veniam officia asperiores aut quo sit. Labore eos non commodi vel. Perferendis pariatur est qui est perspiciatis in. Tempora dolorem quia quia natus. Quia libero architecto illum. Ipsam sint consequatur culpa sit iusto consequatur in.
Dicta sed et saepe rerum nobis aspernatur assumenda. Ut incidunt reiciendis vero illum tempora consequuntur rem. Optio ullam consequatur veritatis molestias. Recusandae voluptates est blanditiis. Quidem voluptas similique perferendis nihil.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Et quod officiis voluptatem explicabo sapiente natus. Sed non voluptatum voluptates blanditiis. Alias quod dolore error esse nulla laboriosam omnis. Quos suscipit quaerat qui rerum accusamus temporibus.
Veritatis sed voluptatem amet impedit impedit vel. Dolores earum occaecati dolor harum sint.
Sint ipsam eius voluptatem impedit rem quae. Aliquid quos recusandae aperiam. Cupiditate sit est impedit et nihil vero tempore.
Odio commodi velit quia adipisci. Commodi voluptatem eum consequatur suscipit et.