Why did you do your MBA or why are you considering an MBA?
I was just wondering for the people who're currently enrolled in an MBA program or completed MBAs or are considering getting an MBA, why did you decide to pursue an MBA or why are you considering an MBA? For career switchers it's a pretty easy answer : they are from a non-business background and need to break into the financial world which an MBA allows them to do that. But for the folks that already have business/ management degrees or are already working in the financial services/ consulting industries, why put yourself through all the MBA application processes, give up 2 years of salary + accumulate debt to get an MBA ? What were your motivations/ reasons? Was it any family pressure or was it because your co-workers/ friends are getting an MBA and that's why you decided to get one as well?
For the folks how already finished your MBA: was it worth all the stress/ debt/ effort? If so how? If not, why not?
I'll bite. I graduated in May and have recently started my new job (and it's not in banking or consulting). I didn't have a business undergrad (I was a History major) but I worked in consulting prior to getting my MBA. For me the biggest reason I did it was to open up options. I wanted to leave consulting and I did interview for a few jobs before applying to bschool, but coming from consulting I was fairly limited to corp. strategy-type roles. By getting my MBA, I gave myself a lot more options in terms of industry, geography and function. I also was quite lucky in that I didn't take on any debt for my degree (between savings, scholarship and my parents kicking in some money I didn't need any loans), so finances weren't quite as much of a consideration. It was definitely worth it, as I love my new job and now have a huge network in my new industry (and at my new company).
Greatly said, some of us with STEM degrees, an MBA was the only way to switch careers.
check UC Haas and UNC Kenan Flager versions of WHY MBA materials. otherwise good luck. you asked twice.
I never heard someone regretting the fact that they did an MBA. Even some people who didn't really enjoyed their experience, they still believe it was the best choice.
On the other hand, I know people who regret that they didn't.
1) Moving to the US. I'm a permanent resident, but with a non-US undergrad and work experience I feel that I need some US credentials and network to fully settle in.
2) Exploring options to switch careers. Not sure if I want to do that yet (I'm in consulting) and what kinds of opportunities will be open to me, but it's nice to have this option.
3a) Interesting life experience. I'm going to be working for the next few decades, and does it really matter if I make Director at say 35 or 37? But when I'm 60+ I sure do want to have memories of going to the HBS.
3b) Also, when else will I have an opportunity to spend 2 years doing my own stuff (e.g. I like writing) and broadening my horizons without derailing my career?
4) Education. I do believe that the case method provides valuable educational experience, not so much in hard skills (and I don't need those anyway), but soft skills - definitely, i.e. arguing the case, "making" decisions under uncertainty and building a convincing rationale for them et cetera. Also I can go to classes in other departments in my 2nd year to pick up interesting stuff. Clubs and classmates can provide a lot of industry knowledge as well.
5) Last but not the least, black swans. High-caliber business schools are the type of environment where you're exposed to an increased probability of interesting shit happening. This can range from becoming friends with a future president of some country or a start-up billionaire to getting some unique job opportunities that you didn't know existed to whatever.
Why am I going for an MBA? (Originally Posted: 11/29/2009)
Here's a question: if your goal was IBD at a BB for a career, and you had two options: start as an analyst or go to an MBA for a career switch to associate, which makes more sense? I have a lot of contacts I can leverage to vie for an analyst position. How hard is it to direct promote to associate? I see it this way--I would gain more experience in modeling and deals as an analyst than as an MBA student, and I would actually make money instead of spending $160K. So, put yourself in my hypothetical soon-to-be shoes:
You are 26-27 and can either go top MBA or FT Analyst at a BB. Long term goal is banking/M&A/PE. Does the MBA make a difference in the long run? Is it worth the 2 years and obscene tuition for branding? Can you make VP/MD without an MBA?
i'm guessing it depends largely on your political skills, as BB's shouldn't be short on good bankers. so being good should complement your networking (ie ass-licking) and self-marketing skills. but this is from a strictly academic (theoretical) point of view.
Why MBA? (Originally Posted: 06/09/2015)
Hello,
I just had a very basic question on why the people on this forum or people you knew chose the MBA route. If you are already working for a BB or an elite boutique, what is the advantage of going to get your MBA?
Thanks!
If you want to stay in banking then it doesn't make sense. But why the hell would you want to stay in banking??
Fair point! So if you want to end up in PE or a HF you should consider an MBA? Sorry for such basic questions!
there's really no benefit except to take a break. having that network might MIGHT help you win deals as an MD.
Almost all the ex BB IB people at Kellogg joined to leave banking. A handful aimed for PE/VC, but usually people went for MBB, corp strat, or corp dev roles.
Why do you go an MBA school? (Originally Posted: 05/26/2015)
I am a corporate finance manager with over 9 yrs career in Asia. I started my career as a CPA, worked long years in top accounting firms, and now have secured decent job in a global company's headquarter.
I have been considering about an MBA degree in US, and have secured minimum conditions to apply a school, such as GMAT and TOEFL.
but always failed to explain why MBA.
For me.. the genuine reasons for an MBA degree are just two.
1) Upgrade my background: I graduated a decent school in my country, but no top school. I would like to strengthen my background by having a degree from any prestigious school and access to its vast alumni network.
2) Connect to new career opportunities: I am satisfied with my job as it is stable and respectable. But not challenging at all. In other words, I would like to do something new in my career.
I have already worked in finance for 9 years and there is no brand new issues that would be challenging for me.
but unfortunately I can't explain what will be my next career goal either as I only have experience in general finance.
So I would like to ask you, why do you apply an MBA degree..? I just consider MBA as a tool for something new in my life, new people, new region, and new profession. But people keep saying that it is not enough excuse to pursuit such extravagant degree in abroad.
Main reason is to sleep around like freshman year of undergrad again
I hope you did that all four years, because that's how you are supposed to do undergrad.
One thing I learned after I was admitted was 90% of people going to top MBA's really aren't sure what they want to do. They might be 50-80% sure sure but few are 90-100% sure. Yet all of these folks crafted compelling enough "Why MBA" essays or answered the question well enough in an interview to get into an MBA business schools">M7.
I treated it this way - find ONE interesting thing that you MIGHT want to do after school, which may be obtainable for you with an MBA but not really without. Let that goal make sense with your background. Let it be 'honest enough' that you could seriously see yourself in that role. Then research what the requirements are, how the school will help you get to that goal, etc. This way you can craft a compelling "why mba" that clearly shows how an MBA will help you transition 'up' or 'out' to that goal. If you 'change' your mind later (which you never really made up in the first place) who cares.
My take is that the main reason a school wants to ensure you have a compelling 'why mba' goal is to ensure you are going to be a viable job candidate coming out so it doesn't hurt their metrics. I bet the University really just wants to make sure you wont waffle around in a job interview by feeling out your goals and dedication in their interview process. Confidently approaching the process with a single, obtainable goal is the easiest way to overcome this. It doesn't need to be the main point of your candidacy.
You should checkout a picture from LBS showing the roadmaps for their Master programs. https://www.london.edu/-/media/files/programme%20files/master%20courses…
Check the second to last page.
you may see yourself towards mid-career, which is open to both MBA and EMBA programs. typically MBA reset your career in a higher leadership level or a different industry---without your need to change jobs drastically, MBA may only help with a promotion. Thus it may have been hard for you to pursue a MBA.
Your lack of career progression and direction may be also hurting your chances. I know accountants who work the same jobs for over 10 years. Hard to justify their needs for a MBA if they're stuck there all along.
I wanted to have a two year vacation, and come out making at least 50% more than I was making previously. Decided on consulting at some point, but had no idea when I applied.
Why go to business school... (Originally Posted: 12/04/2006)
Why go to business school in the first place? Read on...
My BB IB offer, with bonus and signing, will bring me 150,000 max as a first year analyst if the market is strong and I land in one of the top bonus tiers.
However, there are a select few hedge funds that are willing to train the hell out of really top tier business/finance undergradates for two months upon graduation and then give them trading accounts, guarantee them 200K first year all-in with the prospect of 600K-2MM within 3 years, and the sky's the limit...
Can any investment bank, PE shop, or business school boast a formidable argument in the face of such a prospect?
All of this is assuming one has the opportunity to take the job, and has the potential to succeed. How would you sell that person on B school?
Thanks.
Training is what matters. I honestly do care at all if I could make 500k next year at some trading job.
I would trade it for a 2 year training program at the top BB, IM or consulting companies.
Its what you are making 7-10 years out of school that matters, not 1-2.
I'm not sure. Who knows what's going to happen in 7-10 years. If someone offered me 500k (heck even 200k), I think I'd take it. Then, if it doesn't turn out so well, I'd go back and get an MBA and switch careers.
Yes that hedge fund story might be true, but like you said its only for top people at top Univirsities.
Do you really think someone with a 600K/yr job at hedge fund will go for that?
MBA is a way for those who aren't in that bracket, to open the doors to get $. The people who go get an MBA do so for the following reasons:
1-Boost their careers (More opportunities, and jobs they qualify for.) 2-Money(starting salary for undergrad is 40-45K, MBA starting is 100K on average) 3-Get a better school on their resume(if they went to crappy undergrad)
Overall its an option to reinvent yourself.
Disclaimer: The post above has been made by someone who is not currently employed in IBD, and has not had an interview yet...
aspiringmonkey, i think you've got it wrong. I know high fliers (ivy league, summa cum laude, BB M&A and top PE shops) who went back to B-school. Yes it also does all of the three above but that is not all. I guess some people are just suckers for a higher degree. That said, almost no one I know in Trading/HF went back to B-School.
I was more talking from persepctive of non-targets, of course there are a ton of ivy guys who go get their MBAs(they fall under 1. and 2.)
As far as the reason why traders stick around, its probably because an MBA does nothing for them. Doesn't open up a ton of opportunities like other fields
Disclaimer: The post above has been made by someone who is not currently employed in IBD, and has not had an interview yet...
An MBA is a hedge, and thats it when it comes to finance world.
Why business school? (Originally Posted: 05/28/2015)
first of all - I'll introduce the subject - I'm wondering if I should attend ISEG business & finance school in Paris or simply get a law & social science degree from the Sorbonne (which is free since there are practically no tuition fees in France)
I've just completed my terminale littéraire in a private high school here in Paris and I'm simply trying to perceive the best pathways for the next 3 years. I'm interested in legal issues and figured that I might as well very easily combine it with the financial sector at one point?
This might seem a little bit vague and off settling but I'm also wondering what kind of opinion you might have on IQ societies and if you would state them on your cv?
I'm thinking about Mensa - Intertel - TNS & ISPE for instance?
I guess a Prometheus or Mega membership instantly catches the eye of an employer but they're less known and more restrictive than the ones mentioned (above 160 IQ is also pretty difficult to measure and you need specific psychometric tools)...
Anyway... Thanks for helping me out!
pe
First thing: Assuming that you're fluent with english (the vocabulary suggests it is), I'd suggest keeping in mind that you need to adjust your language for the audience. On my end I actually don't know what my IQ is(throw monkey shit if you want, it's true) because the last time I took an IQ test was in high school and I got every single question right. I had to learn the hard way that just because you're smart doesn't count for jack shit. You might be able to brilliantly dissect any issue but that's got no significance unless you are able to clearly, concisely, and persuasively state your conclusions. You would do well to learn how to use more direct language and choose stronger words for key points.
Second I don't think those societies are huge advantages. That said it's always good to join any kind of society given that your entry barrier is low: the biggest reason is that you can easily use LinkedIN to find other members who work in the field that you want to and that common talking point is a good way to get the conversation started.
For putting it on the resume I'd do it, but it would be a single word under a bullet of "professional memberships" of some such.
Also, quite frankly IQ doesn't help that much with these kinds of decisions. You have to follow it intuitively on some level. If you're mostly interested in law to the point where you end up reading about it in your spare time it's probably the way to go.....but there isn't as much overlap between law and finance as you'd think. Here in the US there's a program called a JD/MBA where students come out with both certifications from the same school. General consensus is that it's a waste of time since there's so little overlap between what finance analysts and lawyers do. While there's a few viable specializations out there the only one I've ever talked to people about is M&A advisers.
Also as per our PM conversation: I don't know who the fuck you think Christopher is, but it's not me. My real name starts with a vowel.
You're either a dude who's trolling me or batshit insane then.
And I'm quite happily married with a wife who puts out whenever I want, thanks.
No, I'm 29 and get whatever kind of sex I want daily if I ask for it.
I'm half tempted to give you my real phone # so I can find out who you are, and get you arrested for stalking. I'm still curious why you've come to the conclusion that I'm "Chris". Literally everything I've ever posted points to me being under 30.
IQ isn't correlated with success after 120-130 range....and pretty much everyone at top schools is at or above that range. No one of those organizations will help you, in fact, they're more likely to hurt you, as they signal poor EQ skills.
Exactly my opinion as well - EQ seems far more important than anything else - especially within the business world
Why get an MBA (Originally Posted: 02/04/2012)
So it seems like the career path of your average IBanker is:
1st Year Analyst 2nd Year Analyst (3rd Year Analyst) MBA MBA 1st Year Associate 2nd Year Associate 3rd Year Associate
what's the point of the MBA if you could just save the tuition money and jump straight from analyst to associate?
Lots of reasons:
>Burned out need a vacation
>Didn't want/get direct associate promote
>PE firm made you go back to school
>To get into IM/HF/PE/VC/Consulting/Marketing/Retail/F500
>To get a broad perspective on different business functions/industries, and occasionally learn something new
>"Networking" aka making friends who will also provide some inside color on industries you're interested in.
>Get two resume building years to mess around/do entrepreneurial stuff
>Just got married/want to get married and need time
>Also, for international couples, MBA= Making Babies in America (citizenship FTW)
>work on leadership, public speaking, golf and other skills that need polishing
Basically, you buy back two years of your 20s, while enhancing your resume. It's true that if you just want to do banking at a senior level, MBA might not be helpful (I hear that in HK most bankers don't do it), but a lot of ex-bankers at MBA don't want to do banking at a senior level. I don't know a single BB IBD analyst in my class who is recruiting to become a BB IBD associate (the extreme few who recruited banking, did so for more specialized boutiques). On the flip side, my friends who loved banking (they're basically machines) got a direct to associate promote.
Also, most people aspire to do 1~2yrs IBD > 2yrs PE > 2yrs MBA > PE
For those of you that did go to business school after an analyst stint, would you say that the most common situation for paying for an MBA is through loans (as opposed to the alternative of company sponsorship, since it's my understanding that sponsorship is rare amongst banks)? I'm pretty ignorant to the MBA scenario currently, so I'd appreciate some opinions.
I just have trouble justifying business school in my mind, especially only 2-3 years after leaving school...even a corp development job that pays less than PE seems more enticing than just ripping into your nest egg you've started building during your analyst years just for networking and "rebranding" purposes.
AalH,
the reason you're confused is because your assumptions are false. Revise your premises. That is not the traditional career path.
To be fair, it may be a "traditional" career trajectory for someone in banking for the long haul. But they are few and far between.
I thought it was due to self-selection, since many analysts don't think about direct promote but bail out to PE or corp development after analyst stint... but I could be totally wrong.
given that an analyst is gunning for direct promote, would you say that it is still really hard?
You are right about self-selection bias since approximately 50% of analysts gun for buyside exits after their analyst stinits. Nonetheless, the direct promote route is pretty hard to attain since the MBA-to-associate-to-senior banker route is an ingrained institution and a lot of the characteristics that make a great analyst great simply does not become applicable at a mid-VP level. Think the best investment bankers or even MDs you know - how many are direct analyst promotes? It is below 5% based on my personal experience.
Quas consequuntur iste repudiandae quisquam. Doloribus velit harum delectus suscipit facere officiis. Saepe dolorum quas aut enim deleniti dolorem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Necessitatibus asperiores occaecati soluta dolores. Tempore cum sit exercitationem odit ea qui totam. Modi soluta consequatur dicta quod vel incidunt. Et alias et provident voluptas cumque eos expedita. Quia possimus enim et dolorum esse aut quis. Exercitationem iste soluta consequatur delectus.
Dolorem eum ea qui dolores amet at molestiae reprehenderit. Nihil ipsa est maxime occaecati dignissimos.
Sit quibusdam quibusdam provident cum nemo sequi. Consectetur magnam ipsa doloribus recusandae quasi. Nulla qui magni distinctio expedita nihil tempora. Omnis soluta doloremque a voluptatum assumenda aut. In laborum aperiam veniam dicta beatae deleniti quis.
Recusandae voluptatem eius rerum repellat illo praesentium. Quis reiciendis sunt consequuntur ab. Et quo optio dolorem molestiae. Ut enim maiores id esse sit.
Culpa fugiat cum aliquid rem dolores. Necessitatibus atque qui laudantium nisi id modi ut. Illo beatae laudantium vel quibusdam adipisci. Ut occaecati est enim est qui harum. Qui occaecati id veritatis quibusdam. Est amet et sed sint laudantium neque porro et. Enim beatae laborum repellendus soluta nihil accusamus culpa.